從研究者任職之公立國中常辦理的採購案件中,舉五個代表性採購案例---營養午餐採購案、校外教學採購案、圖書館空間環境改善工程採購案、電梯保養採購案和合作社新生制服採購案,探討準用最有利標、取最有利標之精神、同質最低標、逕洽廠商而取據核銷(小額採購)和不適用政府採購法等五種採購辦理方式,分析研究教育主管機關相關法規規定、是否適用政府採購法之理由、適用何種招標和決標方式,及其作業程序。 之後參考政府採購相關法令、採購案文件資料蒐集、採購主辦機關相關人員訪談、個人工作經驗及本研究整理探討公立國中各類型之採購案流程出現的問題:採購評估問題---異質或同異評估認定、公立國中員生消費合作社學生代收代付採購案辦理方式之評估、採購招標問題---招標等標期、投標廠商數目、採購評選評審問題---評選委員或評審委員組成和人數、評選委員會評選委員外聘專家和學校內部教師比例、工作小組、評選或評審時間、評選委員或評審委員採購專業知識不足、評選或評審項目,本研究係以公立國中辦理學校採購之立場與角度提出建議,以期本研究成果能提供日後公立國中辦理相關採購之參考。
Among the procurement cases of the public junior high school which the author worked in, five representative cases involving procurement of nutritious lunches, off-campus teaching, library spatial environment improvement works, elevator maintenance and uniforms for new students of the cooperatives are selected to explore five methods including approved advantageous bid, selecting the most advantageous bid, minimum bid among bidders of the same qualification, cancel after verification in direction negotiation with manufacturers (purchase on a small quantity) and procurement not applicable to the government procurement law, and analyze whether the laws and regulations stipulated by education administration authorities are applicable to the Government Procurement Law, and what types for bidding and tendering they are suitable for and the corresponding operation procedures. Then, based on the relevant laws and regulations concerning government procurement, documents about procurement, interviews with personnel at procurement authorities, personal experience and the research contents in this paper, the author explores the problems in various procurement cases at public junior middle school, involving procurement assessment (homogeneous or heterogeneous assessment), assessment of procurement by the third-party collection and payment for students at faculty-student cooperative of public junior middle school; procurement bidding, i.e., bidding period, number of bidding manufactures; judges for procurement assessment, namely, the committee members, committee composition and numbers, proportion of external experts to school faculties, working group, time for selection, inadequate professional knowledge of experts and the items for selection. This paper proposes suggestions from the standpoint of the procurement at public junior middle schools, expecting that the research results can be used as reference for public junior middle schools.