透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.171.235
  • 學位論文

動物的道德地位:Singer的效益主義進路動物的道德地位考察

The animals possess moral position

指導教授 : 蕭振邦
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


2006年3月台中市棄犬留置場,因經費匱乏,發生狗吃狗的慘案,這裡我們看到很大的動物問題。本論文目的,要透過考察動物擁有的道德地位,並為「平等的對待動物」找到可能的依據,以證成其可能性。因此,選擇「動物的道德地位:Singer的效益主義進路動物的道德地位考察」為題,在於試圖透過哲學性的探究,以考察人類在反省對待動物的「道德考量」是如何形成?這些原則如何衍生實際行動力等等! 就研究進路言,先收集、分析與整理相關文獻,發現動物問題在於人類與動物的關係。確定論文題目後,透過理論之考察確立動物擁有道德地位,並且為「平等的考量和對待動物」找到可能的依據。在方法上,先探究Singer的效益主義進路的動物倫理,並輔以Frey、Regan及Cohen等各哲學家對Singer見解批評與Singer的回應。 對於動物的道德地位究竟是生而有之亦或需透過人類賦予?我認為,各種對於動物道德地位學說的提出,希望藉著各家學說的釐清與闡述,來了解人類在世界中將如何去定位、對待動物,讓人類去修正自己過去不合理的對待動物的看法與行動,這是我對於本論文與自己的期許。

並列摘要


Due to the shortage of funds, dog’s tragic incident of eating the dog happened in the animal shelter for abandoned dogs in Taichung in March, 2006. In this incident, we perceive a very serious animal problem. The purpose of this thesis is to find the possible basis to prove the possibility of treating animals equally through investigating the moral position that animals have. Therefore, the main point of selecting the animals possess moral position as the subject is to survey how the moral consideration is formed in mind when people introspect the treatment of animals, and how these principles derive practical actions. In the course of the exploration, the researcher collected, analyzed, and put relevant documents in order and the researcher, during the process, discovered the animals’ problem lies in the relation between the mankind and the animal. After confirming the topic of the thesis, the next step was to affirm that the animals possess moral position through the investigation of the theories, and to find possible basis for treating animals equally. For the study method, the researcher first probed into the animal ethics in the perspectives of Singer’s Utilitarianism, and then study the criticism on Singer’s viewpoints made by philosophers: Frey, Regan and Cohen, and Singer’s responses for the criticism. Are the animals born to have moral position? Is the position conferred by the mankind? The aim of the research is to understand how the mankind should orientate animals and treat them equally by bringing up the theories of animals’ moral position, and to amend the mankind’s irrational attitude and ill treatment to the animals.

參考文獻


5.江麗美(譯), Louis Pojman(著),2001,《生與死:現代道德困境的挑戰》(Life and Death: Grappling with the Moral Dilemmas of Our Time,1995),台北:桂冠,初版一刷。
22.鄔昆如, 1996,〈倫理學的各種學說〉,輯於專業倫理課程委員會(編),《專業倫理論文集「二」》,1998,台北:輔仁大學出版社,二版一刷。
10.孟祥森˙錢永祥(等譯),Peter Singer(著),2002,《動物解放》(Animal Liberation,1996),台北:關懷生命協會,初版三刷。
2.邱曉芬,1999,《動物保護思想:彼得辛格之「動物解放」倫理探討》,台北:國立臺灣師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文。
1. Bentham, Jeremy, 1789, The Principles of Morals and Legislation Buffalo, NY: Promethens.

被引用紀錄


林祐立(2013)。農場動物福利之實然與應然-以我國法制之檢討分析為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10921
陳麗鈴(2008)。湯姆‧黎根觀點下的彼得‧辛格〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0207200917355818
吳錇涵(2010)。動物保護理論與實踐—以我國動物保護法為觀察對象〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2506201014381400
陳春吟(2011)。動物道德地位:辛格及雷根與佛教之比較論述〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314420314
張玉玲(2014)。論經濟動物的困境與解決之道〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512002935

延伸閱讀