臺海兩岸美容技能檢定內涵及教學效應之比較研究

A Comparative Study on the Cosmetology Skills Tests and the Relevant Teaching Effects between Taiwan and Mainland China

聶惠如(Huei-Ru Nie)

指導教授 ： 羅希哲

國立屏東科技大學/人文暨社會科學院/技術及職業教育研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2008.00045

摘要

本研究旨在探討臺海兩岸美容技能檢定內涵及教學效應之比較研究，採文件分析法，研究分析兩岸政府制定之法規、標準等資料進行兩岸美容技能檢定內涵比較。其目的包括：兩岸美容技能檢定之意義與功能之比較；兩岸美容技能檢定之發展與沿革之比較；兩岸美容技能檢定之類別與技能檢定內容之比較；兩岸美容技能檢定對老師在教學上影響學生的差異情形之比較。 　　主要研究工具有二：(一) 教學活動影響之量表 (二) 學習行為影響之量表。以大陸北京市及台灣高雄市為研究範圍，台灣地區問卷數總計340份回收問卷數 301份回收率88.5% ，大陸地區問卷數總計140份回收問卷數126份回收率90.0%。以描述性統計分析、分析獨立樣本t檢、單因子變異數分、Scheffe事後多重比較法進行研究。本研究之結論如下： 一、在不同個人背景的高職美容科學生對於美容技能檢定之教學活動感受是否有顯著的差異情形。得到結論兩岸皆無顯著。表示假設未獲得支持。 二、在不同個人背景的高職美容科學生對於美容技能檢定之學習行為是否有顯著差異情形。 　　結果在「學習動機」層面有顯著差異男性在此分層面高於女性；學習動機二年級高於三年級；學習態度二年級高於一年級；學習方法二年級高於一年級。整體學習行為臺灣二年級高於一年級。大陸則無顯著差異。 　　根據研究之結論提供給兩岸各高職學校及政府相關單位參考。

關鍵字

技能檢定 ； 比較研究 ； 美容教育

並列摘要

The objective of this study is to make a comparative study on the cosmetology skills tests and the relevant teaching effects between Taiwan and mainland China. Document analysis method was employed to analyze the laws, regulations and standards stipulated by the two governments across the Taiwan Strait so as to conduct a comparative study on the cosmetology skills tests of the two areas. The purposes are: to compare the meanings and functions of the cosmetology skills tests between the two areas; to compare the development and evolution of the cosmetology skills tests between the two areas; to compare the categories and contents of the cosmetology skills tests between the two areas, and to compare how the cosmetology skills tests affect teachers’ teaching activities and students’ learning results between the two areas.
There are two major research tools: (1) teaching activities scale and (2) learning behaviors scale. The research regions include Bejing City, mainland China and Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. A total of 340 questionnaires were distributed in Taiwan and 301 were returned, with a response rate of 88.5%. A total of 140 questionnaires were distributed in mainland China and 126 were returned, with a response rate of 90.0%.
The research methods include descriptive statistical analysis, independent samples T-test, One Way ANOVA and scheffe's multiple comparison test. The research findings are as follows:
1. To examine whether there is a significant difference in students’ feelings toward the teaching activities relevant to the cosmetology skills tests. The students are from a variety of backgrounds studying at the cosmetology department of vocational high schools. The result shows that there is no significant difference among the students across the Taiwan Strait. This indicates that the hypothesis is not supported.
2. To examine whether there is a significant difference in students’ learning behaviors relevant to the cosmetology skills test. The students are from a different background studying at the cosmetology department of vocational high schools.
The result shows that there is a significant difference in “learning motivation” between male and female students. Male students have a higher learning motivation than female students. Students studying in the second grade have a higher learning motivation than those who studying in the third grade. Students studying in the second grade have a better learning attitude than those who studying in the first grade. Students studying in the second grade have better learning methods than those who studying in the first grade. In Taiwan, students studying in the second grade have a better overall learning behavior than those who studying in the first grade. In mainland China, there is no significant difference.
The research findings can be used as a reference for vocational high schools and relevant governmental agencies across the Taiwan Strait.

並列關鍵字

Skill Test ； Comparative Study ； Cosmetology Education

參考文獻

徐明廷（2002）。在校生專案技能檢定對商職會計教學影響之研究。私立中原大學會計研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。

張波峰(1993)。加強技能檢定與職業證照制度研究摘要。技術及職業教育，13，36-40。

許惠東（1993）：高職應屆畢業生取得技術士證照實施方式之探討。技術及職業教育雙月刊，13，16-18。

陳聰勝、翁上錦、趙健揚（2002）。大陸技能檢定現況探討。技術及職業教育，68，18-23。

勞委會（2000）。中華民國職業分類典。台北：行政院勞工委員會。