長榮大學新生體適能比較分析－以100與101學年度為例

The Different School Year Students Physical Fitness Comparative Analysis

陳柏憲 ； 陳金海

《長榮運動休閒學刊》 7期 (2013/06) Pp. 90-98

摘要

本研究目的在比較長榮大學不同學年度學生體適能的差異情形。本研究以長榮大學100、101學年度一年級學生為研究對象，測驗方法是採用教育部所訂定之方法為標準，項目包括身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐、立定跳遠、跑走。所測得之各項體適能成績以t-test考驗統計方法進行分析。結果發現：不同學年度男學生體適能只有在仰臥起坐及1600公尺跑走兩項目達顯著差異，100學年度18歲男學生的仰臥起坐顯著優於101學年度，101學年度19歲男學生1600公尺跑走顯著優於100學年度。不同學年度女學生各體適能項目都未達顯著差異。

關鍵字

體適能:學生

並列摘要

The purpose of this study, Chang Jung Christian University students annual physical fitness of students the differences in the comparison. To 100,101 academic year of Chang Jung Christian University first-year students, the research study, the test method is a standard set by the Ministry of Education, the projects include the BMI, sit and reach, sit-ups, standing long jump, running away. Measured the physical fitness scores and statistical methods to the test of the t-test analysis. The results showed that: not classmates annual male student body fitness run away only sit-ups and 1600 meters two projects significant differences, the 18-year-old male student of the school year 100 sit-ups is significantly better than 101 school year, 101 school year 19 year-old male student 1600m significantly better than 100 academic year. Not students annual female students fitness project are less than significant differences.

並列關鍵字

Physical Fitness ； student

參考文獻

方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。台北市:漢文書局。

方進隆(1995)。體適能與全人健康。中華體育。35，62-69。

方進隆(1998)。聽適能推展策略與未來研究方向。中華體育季刊。12(3)，70-77。

()。

莊逸萍、陳信吉(1997)。國立台南師範學院八十四、八十五學年度入學新生體適能之比較。南師體育。5，92-119。