Multiparty Democracies and Rapid Economic Growth a Twenty-first Century Breakthrough?

Devin Joshi

《Taiwan Journal of Democracy》 7卷1期 (2011/07) Pp. 25-46

https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.201107.0002

並列摘要

This essay examines whether developing countries with competitive multiparty democracies may be just as capable of sustaining rapid economic growth as single-party states. It begins with a literature review identifying political stability and the ability to mobilize labor and capital production inputs as key factors behind sustained rapid growth. It then develops the hypothesis that under certain conditions, multiparty democracies may be strong in these dimensions, but ceteris paribus, single-party states are likely to have an advantage. I test this hypothesis by exploring historical trends in rapid growth over the last five decades. Statistical regression analysis confirms that most sustained high-growth regimes have not been competitive multiparty democracies. On a more optimistic note, however, the number of high-growth multiparty democracies increased significantly during the period between 2000 and 2009, signaling a possible breakthrough in the twenty-first century.

並列關鍵字

Democracy ； multiparty democracy ； single-party states ； authoritarianism ； political regimes ； rapid growth ； economic growth ； sustained growth

參考文獻

Przeworski, Adam,Alvarez, Michael,Cheibub, Jose Antonio,Limongi, Fernando(2000).Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990.New York:Cambridge University Press.

Doucouliagos, Hristos,Ulubasoglu, Mehmet Ali(2008).Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis.American Journal of Political Science.52(1),61-83.

Leftwich, Adrian(ed.)(1996).Democracy and Development: Theory and Practice.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.

Przeworski, Adam,Limongi, Fernando(1993).Political Regimes and Economic Growth.Journal of Economic Perspectives.7(3),51-69.

Sirowy, Larry,Inkeles, Alex(1991).The Effects of Democracy on Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Review.Studies in Comparative International Development.25(1),126-157.