The purpose of this study was to investigate the various learning perplexities in tennis group of physical education at Chin Min College. Through a series of statistical analysis in this study, we could gain the following conclusion: 1.The students of tennis group who were tested by many questions in the diagram of learning perplexities could gain different results. That ”students interact on each other” was without any perplexity. The other factors among ”the learning in motions of forehands”, ”the communications with teachers”, ”the interactions with teachers” seemed to fewer perplexities. However, they were most perplexed at such factors as ”the judge of faults”, ”the learning in motions of backhands” and ”the scoring of the games”. 2.The response of this diagram to our students was prone to fewer perplexities. That was, ”social factor,” among other things, was the least perplexity about this study. The sequence of their perplexities were the factors of ”body coordination”, ”rules and knowledge” and ”a feeling for playing tennis”. 3.There were many differences between day and night programs of physical education of our school in this research. The factors making a marked difference (p <0.5) are ”a feeling for playing tennis” as well as ”rules and knowledge,” but the ”social” and ”body-coordinated” factors do not find differences (p>0.5). 4.Our students in tennis group made a marked difference (p<0.5) concerning various factors in this diagram of learning perplexities except for the ”social” one. There were three factors made a marked difference: ”a feeling for playing tennis”, ”rules and knowledge”, ”body coordination”. According to the results of this study, we would try to bring up some suggestions about our teaching design in tennis or administrative steps. From the result, we will expect to improve learning perplexities of our students after doing this research.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the various learning perplexities in tennis group of physical education at Chin Min College. Through a series of statistical analysis in this study, we could gain the following conclusion: 1.The students of tennis group who were tested by many questions in the diagram of learning perplexities could gain different results. That ”students interact on each other” was without any perplexity. The other factors among ”the learning in motions of forehands”, ”the communications with teachers”, ”the interactions with teachers” seemed to fewer perplexities. However, they were most perplexed at such factors as ”the judge of faults”, ”the learning in motions of backhands” and ”the scoring of the games”. 2.The response of this diagram to our students was prone to fewer perplexities. That was, ”social factor,” among other things, was the least perplexity about this study. The sequence of their perplexities were the factors of ”body coordination”, ”rules and knowledge” and ”a feeling for playing tennis”. 3.There were many differences between day and night programs of physical education of our school in this research. The factors making a marked difference (p <0.5) are ”a feeling for playing tennis” as well as ”rules and knowledge,” but the ”social” and ”body-coordinated” factors do not find differences (p>0.5). 4.Our students in tennis group made a marked difference (p<0.5) concerning various factors in this diagram of learning perplexities except for the ”social” one. There were three factors made a marked difference: ”a feeling for playing tennis”, ”rules and knowledge”, ”body coordination”. According to the results of this study, we would try to bring up some suggestions about our teaching design in tennis or administrative steps. From the result, we will expect to improve learning perplexities of our students after doing this research.