社區治理與公民參與：內湖安全社區與東勢安全社區之比較分析

Community Governance and Citizen Participation: A Comparison of Neihu and Dungshr Safe Community

楊佳穎(Chia-Ying Yang)

指導教授 ： 趙永茂

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/政治學研究所/碩士(2010年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.01461

摘要

長久以來，一直都由公部門掌握管理國家的權力，採行「由上而下」的管理方式，但這一切都已不再可行！治理思維的興起，所帶來的不是國家和人民對立的思考，而是鼓舞公部門、私部門和公民建立合夥關係。但有關治理的具體實踐卻缺乏實證研究的釐清，因此本文認為可以從「社區」入手。正因社區是一種公民較願意參與的具體表現，所以特別是在居家生活品質及整體安全提升的議題上，通常能夠獲得公民的迴響。
而「安全社區」則是一種民間自發性的治理需求與理念，正有待公私部門以相同的治理能力來回應。因此，本文遂以「內湖安全社區」與「東勢安全社區」為研究個案，希望能從兩者的長期運作經驗中，結合社區治理和公民參與為基礎，就兩個案進行結構面與運作面之分析探討和比較。一方面檢視其治理網絡之形成與運作，另一方面則藉由不同個案以了解在運動過程中，其公部門、民間私部門和公民社區的互動關係有何異同，進而從觀察兩個案各自之特色及有待精進之處，提供革新之具體建議。
研究結果發現內湖與東勢各有所長，內湖之優勢在於民間私部門的參與程度較高；東勢則是依賴在地情感的維持和公部門的支持。但就整體而言，各仍有不足之處，尚待加強改善之。

關鍵字

社區治理 ； 公民參與 ； 安全社區 ； 動態治理網絡

並列摘要

“The public sector” has been managing the state for a long time. But the top-down approach may not work out anymore. Now, the concept of “Governance”, trying to build partnerships between public sector, private sector and citizen, becomes very popular and many researchers either in the academic or practical field often refer to this term. However, the theory of governance is still lack of clear definition in practical research. Therefore, community may be a place which citizen would like to participate in, to enhance the quality of life and the overall safety of the subjects.
The “Safe Community”, formed by the administration demand and idea of the folk spontaneity, deserves the equal administration capacity from the public and private sectors to respond to the same capacity for governance. Therefore, this literature tries to build on the theory of community governance and citizen participation, and take the Health Promotion Association of the Safe Community in Neihu and Dungshr as the research subject. By comparing these two cases, on the one hand, it will help us to understand the formulation and function of the governance networks. And the other hand, we can clarify the effectiveness of the network structure by examining individual case and thus from the observation of two cases, to offer relevant recommendations by ways of comparison.
The conclusion of this study showed that the dynamic governance network in Neihu and Dungshr, their actual operation are not exactly the same. However, Neihu's advantage lies in higher participation of private sector and the third sector participate in the network; and Dungshr gets a strong emotional maintenance from local citizen and the support of administration. But on the whole, there are still some shortcomings need to be improve.

並列關鍵字

community governance ； citizen participation ； Safe Community ； dynamic governance network

參考文獻

王皓平，2006，《地方利害關係人治理模式之研究：以臺北市大理街社區運動為例》，臺北：國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。

李宗勳，2004，〈「安全社區」新視野與社區管理的構聯〉，《公共行政學報》，10：25-62。

李宗勳，2009a，〈公民社會與社區參與－從心態期待到空間讓渡〉，《政大公共行政學報》，30：131-148。

官有垣、李宜興、謝祿宜，2006，〈社區型基金會的治理研究：以嘉義新港及宜蘭仰山兩家文教基金會為案例〉，《公共行政學報》(政大)，18：21-50。

高瑞穗，2004，〈安全社區的營造與推動〉，《工業安全衛生月刊》，12：22-25。