鑑於無效醫療的研究多著重在醫療人員或倫理法律學家的見解,缺少民眾立場的觀點,本質性研究旨在探討居住於社區,75歲以上,且患有慢性病老人對無效醫療之看法。研究者以立意取樣收案,個別訪談9位居住於台南地區老人,將半結構式訪談過程,全程錄音,並轉錄為逐字稿。訪談資料以內容分析法進行分析,最後歸納五個主要主題與十三個次主題所構成。主題與次主題分別為:(1)感受無效處置存在-寄望醫療科技、依賴健保之福利、延長生命的痛苦、討論死亡議題;(2)重度慢性病造成家庭負荷-久病拖累家庭成員、加重經濟負擔、影響自身與家人情緒;(3)聽從醫師建議-尊重專業;(4)與慢性病共存-學習與疾病共處、重視銀髮健康、找尋社會支持;(5)醫療指示需及時-接受安寧意願高、對預立醫療指示存有不確定感。本研究結果可促使醫療相關單位及政府重視民眾對無效醫療的看法,進而帶動社區高齡長者對安寧療護和病人自主權利相關知識之提升。
Most studies of futile care focus on the perspective of ethicists, lawyers, and health care providers. This qualitative study explores perceptions of medical futility in community-dwelling older adults 75 years or older with chronic illnesses. Nine older adults were recruited through purposive sampling to participate in individual face-to-face interviews. These semi-structured interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed by content analysis. Five themes and thirteen sub-themes emerged from the data: (1) Sense of medical futility: expectations of medical technology, dependence on the National Health Service, prolonging the agony of life, discussion of death-related issues; (2) Severe chronic disease as a caregiver’s burden: encumbering family members, financial burden, physical and psychological burden; (3) Compliance with the physician's advice: respect toward professionals; (4) Living with chronic disease: learning to live with the disease, watching for health problems, looking for social support; and (5) Documenting advance directives in a timely manner: favoring palliative care, uncertainty regarding advance directives. Study findings may help health-related institutions understand medical futility from the perspective of health care consumers, which will allow them to better inform community-dwelling old adults about palliative care and the Patient Autonomy Bill.