Title

依違於大我、小我之間:解讀臺灣民眾對兩岸經貿交流的心理糾結

Translated Titles

Hesitating between Private Interests and Collective Interests: An Analysis of the Public's Dilemma on Cross-Strait Economic Exchanges

DOI

10.6683/TPSR.201606.20(1).1-59

Authors

陳映男(Ying-Nan Chen);耿曙(Shu Keng);陳陸輝(Lu-Huei Chen)

Key Words

民意 ; 兩岸關係 ; 利益 ; 認同 ; 認知 ; public opinion ; cross-strait relations ; interests ; identity ; social cognition

PublicationName

台灣政治學刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

20卷1期(2016 / 06 / 01)

Page #

1 - 59

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

人類的政治生活中,經常面臨「群體利益」與「個人利益」難以兩全的情況,面對這樣的兩難,當事人將如何抉擇?這涉及政治生活的本質,我們也希望瞭解臺灣民眾的傾向。有鑑於此,本研究乃針對臺灣民眾對於兩岸經貿的糾結,透過2008年又一波經貿開放前後所進行的三次平行民調,觀察他們如何在兩難間取捨。我們的研究顯示,臺灣民眾對經貿開放的立場,既受其所認知的整體利害,也為其所認定的個人得失所左右。兩者若有所衝突,民眾一般無所適從。但因此而有所糾結的民眾,則往往更在意整體利害:民眾認知兩岸開放若對臺灣有害,即支持緊縮;反之,則傾向贊成開放。

English Abstract

Collective interests and private interests are often at odds in political life. If faced with such a dilemma, what stance would Taiwanese take? By starting from the problem, we employ cross-Strait exchanges as the case, and examine the choices of the Taiwanese people. We conduct three cross-sectional surveys to observe the dynamics of their choices both with and without dilemmas. Our research findings suggest that these people care about both collective and private interests. If the two are directly at odds with each other, these people will, however, normally be caught in between and could take a clear position on the issue. However, if they can avoid making the difficult choice, they will generally tend to stand for the collective interests. That is, if they consider cross-Strait exchanges to be good for Taiwan, they will be for such exchanges; if not, they will definitely oppose them.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 政治學
Reference
  1. Keng, Shu,Chen, Lu-huei,Huang, Kuan-bo(2006).Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations.Issues & Studies,42(4),23-66.
    連結:
  2. 吳乃德(2005)。麵包與愛情:初探臺灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊,9(2),5-39。
    連結:
  3. 林宗弘、胡克威(2011)。愛恨 ECFA:兩岸貿易與台灣的階級政治。思與言,49(3),95-134。
    連結:
  4. 林琮盛、耿曙(2005)。從「安全」與「利益」的兩難中解套:再思兩岸關係中的市場力量。遠景基金會季刊,6(4),239-281。
    連結:
  5. 耿曙(2009)。經濟扭轉政治?中共『惠台政策』的政治影響。問題與研究,48(3),1-32。
    連結:
  6. 耿曙、陳陸輝(2003)。兩岸經貿互動與台灣政治版圖:南北區塊差異推手?。問題與研究,42(6),1-27。
    連結:
  7. 耿曙、曾于蓁(2010)。中共邀訪臺灣青年政策的政治影響。問題與研究,49(3),29-70。
    連結:
  8. 耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝(2009)。打破維持現狀的迷思:台灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難。臺灣政治學刊,13(2),3-56。
    連結:
  9. 陳陸輝、耿曙、王德育(2009)。兩岸關係與 2008 年臺灣總統大選:認同、利益、威脅與選民投票取向。選舉研究,16(2),1-22。
    連結:
  10. 陳陸輝、耿曙、涂萍蘭、黃冠博(2009)。理性自利或感性認同?影響臺灣民眾兩岸經貿立場因素的分析。東吳政治學報,27(2),87-125。
    連結:
  11. 陳陸輝、陳映男、王信賢(2012)。經濟利益與符號態度:解析臺灣認同的動力。東吳政治學報,30(3),1-55。
    連結:
  12. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2003)。模稜兩可的態度還是不確定的未來:臺灣民眾統獨觀的解析。中國大陸研究,46(5),1-20。
    連結:
  13. 童振源(2011)。ECFA 的爭議與成效。國家發展研究,11(1),97-130。
    連結:
  14. 童振源(2000)。台灣與中國經貿關係:經濟與安全的交易。遠景季刊,1(2),31-81。
    連結:
  15. 童振源(2003)。兩岸經濟整合與臺灣的國家安全顧慮。遠景基金會季刊,4(3),41-58。
    連結:
  16. Horney, Karen. 1937. The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  17. Lewin, Kurt. 1935. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. New York, NY: Scribner.
  19. 中國國務院臺灣事務辦公室,2010,〈胡錦濤在日本橫濱會見連戰〉,http://www.gwytb.gov.cn/speech/speech/201101/t20110123_1724073.htm,查閱時間:2010/11/13。Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council PRC. 2010. “Hu jin tao zai riben hengbin huijian lian zhan” [PRC leader Hu Jintao Met with Lien Chan in Yokohama, Japan]. (Accessed on November 13, 2010).
  20. 中華民國總統府,2009,〈馬英九總統 97 年言論選集〉,http://www.president.gov.tw/portals/0/images/PresidentOffice/AboutPresident/pdf/sectionone.pdf , 查閱時間:2011/05/01。Office of the President, Republic of China. 2009. “Ma ying jiu zongtong 97 nian yanlun xuanji” [Taiwan's Renaissance President Ma Ying-jeou's Selected Addresses and Messages, 2008]. (Accessed on May 1, 2011).
  21. 中華民國總統府,2010,〈馬英九總統 98 年言論選集〉,http://www.president.gov.tw/portals/0/images/PresidentOffice/AboutPresident/pdf/98sectionone.pdf,查閱時間:2011/05/01。Office of the President, Republic of China. 2010. “Ma ying jiu zongtong 98 nian yanlun xuanji” [Taiwan's Renaissance President Ma Ying-jeou's Selected Addresses and Messages, 2009]. (Accessed on May 1, 2011).
  22. 吳玉山,2012,〈凍結認同 經濟掛帥能否持久?〉,《聯合報》,01 月 15 日。Wu, Yu-shan. 2012. “Dongjie renting jingji guashuai nengfou chijiu?” [Is Economics-in-Command Sustainable While the National Identity Has Been Frozen?]. United Daily News (January 15).
  23. 政治大學選舉研究中心,2015,〈重要政治態度分佈趨勢圖-臺灣民眾臺灣人/中國人認同趨勢分佈〉,http://esc.nccu.edu.tw/course/news.php?Sn=166,查閱時間:2016/04/06。Election Study Center, NCCU. 2015. “Zhongyao zhengzhi taidu fenbu qushitu: taiwan minzhong taiwanren/zhongguoren rentong qushi fenbu” [Important Political Attitude Trend Distribution-Taiwanese/Chinese Identification Trend Distribution in Taiwan]. (Accessed on April 6, 2016).
  24. 陳陸輝,2012,〈臺灣民意與兩岸關係〉,政大選舉研究中心電訪案,台北:政大。Chen, Lu-huei. 2012. Public Opinion on Taiwan and Cross-Strait Relations. Telephone Survey of Election Study Center, NCCU. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
  25. 陸委會,2008、,〈兩岸社會交流統計〉,http://www.mac.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=5713&CtUnit=3971&BaseDSD=7&mp=1,查閱時間:2013/04/09。Mainland Affairs Council. 2008. “Liangan shehui jiaoliu tongji” [Statistics on Cultural Exchanges]. (Accessed on April 9, 2013).
  26. 陸委會,2012,〈兩岸社會交流統計〉,http://www.mac.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode = 5713&CtUnit = 3971&BaseDSD= 7&mp = 1,查閱時間:2013/04/09。Mainland Affairs Council. 2012. “Liangan shehui jiaoliu tongji” [Statistics on Cultural Exchanges]. (Accessed on April 9, 2013).
  27. Baldwin, David A.(1985).Economic Statecraft.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  28. Banks, Antoine J.,Valentino, Nicholas A.(2012).Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.American Journal of Political Science,56(2),286-97.
  29. Barzel, Yoram(1997).Economic Analysis of Property Rights.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  30. Becker, Gary S.(1978).The Economic Approach to Human Behavior.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago.
  31. Benford, Robert D.,Snow, David A.(2000).Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.Annual Review of Sociology,26,611-39.
  32. Bienen, Henry(ed.)(1992).Power, Economics, and Security.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  33. Buzan, Barry,Waever, Ole,de Wilde, Jaap(1997).Security: A New Framework for Analysis.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner.
  34. Campbell, David(1998).Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
  35. Cheng, Tun-jen(ed.),Cheng, Chi(ed.),Huang, Chi(ed.),Wu, Samuel S. G.(ed.)(1995).Inherited Rivalry: Conflict Across the Taiwan Straits.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner.
  36. Duch, Raymond M.(2001).A Development Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies.American Political Science Review,95(4),895-910.
  37. Festinger, Leon(1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  38. Gourevitch, Peter、袁明旭譯、朱天飆譯(2009)。艱難時世下的政治。吉林=Jiling:吉林出版社=Ji-ling Press。
  39. Harmon-Jones, Eddie(Eds.),Mills, Judson(Eds.)(1999).Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
  40. Heider, Fritz(1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.New York, NY:Wiley.
  41. Hirschman, Albert O.(1969).National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  42. Hiscox, Michael J.、于揚傑譯(2005)。國際貿易與政治衝突:貿易、聯盟與要素流動程度。北京=Beijing:中國人民大學出版社=Renmin University of China。
  43. Ho, Szu-yin,Liu, I-chou(2002).The Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of the Taiwan People in the 1990s.American Asian Review,20(2),29-74.
  44. Horney, Karen(1992).Our Inner Conflicts: A Constructive Theory of Neurosis.New York, NY:W. W. Norton.
  45. Hu, Richard Wei-xing(ed.)(2012).New Dynamics in Cross-Taiwan Straits Relations: How Far Can the Rapprochement Go?.London, UK:Routledge.
  46. Kahneman, D.,Tversky, A.(1979).Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.Econometrica,47(2),263-92.
  47. Kam, Cindy D.,Kinder, Donald R.(2007).Fear and Ethnocentrism: Foundations and American Support for the War on Terrorism.Journal of Politics,69(2),320-38.
  48. Kastner, Scott L.(2009).Political Conflict and Economic Interdependence across the Taiwan Strait and Beyond.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  49. Kerr, Norbert L.(1983).Motivation Losses in Small Groups: A Social Dilemma Analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(4),819-28.
  50. Kinder, Donald R.,Kiewiet, D. Roderick(1981).Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.British Journal of Political Science,2,129-61.
  51. Kinder, Donald R.,Sears, David O.(1981).Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40(3),414-31.
  52. Kramer, Gerald H.(1971).Short-Term Fluctuation in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1986-1964.American Political Science Review,65,131-43.
  53. Kramer, Gerald H.(1983).The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.American Political Science Review,77(1),92-111.
  54. Lewis-Beck, Michael S.(1984).The Economics of Politics in Comparative Perspective: An Introduction.Political Behavior,6(3),205-10.
  55. Lewis-Beck, Michael S.,Paldam, Martin(2000).Economic Voting: An Introduction.Electoral Studies,19(2),113-21.
  56. Lewis-Beck, Michale S.(1988).Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies.Ann Arbor, IL:University of Michigan Press.
  57. Liberman, Peter(1996).Trading with the Enemy: Security and Relative Economic Gains.International Security,21(1),147-75.
  58. Lin, Chong-pin(2008).More Carrot than Stick: Beijing's Emerging Taiwan Policy.China Security,4(1),1-27.
  59. Lupia, Authur(ed.),McCubbins, Mathew D.(ed.),Popkin, Samuel L.(ed.)(2000).Elements of Reason.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  60. Mansfield, Edward D.,Mutz, Diana C.(2009).Support for Free Trade: Self-interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-group Anxiety.International Organization,63(3),425-57.
  61. Marcus, George E.(1988).The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.American Political Science Review,8(2),735-61.
  62. Marcus, George E.,Mackuen, Michael B.(1993).Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.The American Political Science Review,87(3),672-85.
  63. Markus, Gregory B.(1993).The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.American Journal of Political Science,32(1),137-54.
  64. McCombs, Maxwell(2004).Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion.Oxford, UK:Polity.
  65. McDonald, Patrick J.(2009).The Invisible Hand of Peace: Capitalism, the War Machine, and International Relations Theory.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  66. Milner, Helen V、曲博譯(2010)。利益、制度與資訊:國內政治與國際關係。上海=Shanghai:上海人民=Shanghai People's Publishing House。
  67. Nadeau, Richard,Niemi, Richard G.,Amato, Timothy(1995).Emotions, Issue Importance, and Political Learning.American Journal of Political Science,39(3),558-74.
  68. Rogowski, Ronald、楊毅譯(2012)。商業與聯盟。上海=Shanghai:上海人民=Shanghai People's Publishing House。
  69. Rudolph, Thomas J.,Gangl, Amy,Stevens, Dan(2000).The Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Campaign Involvement.The Journal of Politics,62(4),1189-97.
  70. Sears, David O.(ed.),Sidanius, James(ed.),Bobo, Lawerence(ed.)(2000).Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  71. Tanner, Murray Scot(2007).,未出版
  72. Tsang, Steve(ed.)(2012).The Vitality of Taiwan: Politics, Economics, Society and Culture.Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  73. Tullock, Gordon(1974).The Social Dilemma: The Economics of War and Revolution.Blacksburg, VA:University publications.
  74. Valentino, Nicholas A.,Brader, Eric W.,Groenendyk, Eric W.,Gregorowicz, Krysha,Hutchings, Vincent L.(2011).Election Night's Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.The Journal of Politics,73(1),156-70.
  75. Wendt, Alexander(1999).Social Theory of International Politics.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  76. Zimbardo, Philip G.,Leippe, Michael R.(1991).The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  77. 中國評論社(2007)。中共十七大兩岸關係論述解析。中國評論,120,74-85。
  78. 包宗和編、吳玉山編(1999)。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。台北=Taipei:五南=Wunan。
  79. 朱敬一編(2009)。ECFA:開創兩岸互利雙贏新局面。臺北=Taipei:兩岸交流遠景基金會=Prospect Foundation。
  80. 吳玉山(1997)。抗衡或扈從:兩岸關係新詮。台北=Taipei:正中=Cheng Chung Book。
  81. 李誠編(2010)。險渡金融海嘯:台灣經濟未來該怎麼走。台北=Taipei:天下文化書坊=The Commonwealth。
  82. 徐火炎(1996)。台灣選民的國家認同與黨派投票行為:一九九一至一九九三年間的實證研究結果。台灣政治學刊,1,85-127。
  83. 耿曙、張雅雯(2007)。舊階級、新政治?階級分化、保護主義與臺灣政黨的社會基礎。2007 年「全球化時代的公民與國家暨台灣社會變遷基本調查 」第十次研討會,台北=Taipei:
  84. 張亞中(2000)。兩岸統合論。台北=Taipei:生智文化=Sheng-chih。
  85. 陳陸輝(2008)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫行政院國科會專題研究計畫,台北=Taipei:行政院國科會=National Science Council.。
  86. 陳陸輝(2009)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫行政院國科會專題研究計畫,台北=Taipei:行政院國科會=National Science Council.。
  87. 陳博志、林向愷、田君美、龔明鑫、蔡毓芳、張清溪、朱正中、劉錦龍、王光賢(2002)。台灣與中國經貿關係:現代學術研究專刊 12。台北=Taipei:現代學術研究基金會=The Modern Scholarship Foundation。
  88. 陳德昇(1994)。兩岸政經互動:政策解讀與運作分析。台北=Taipei:永業=Yung-yeh。
  89. 陸委會(2006)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  90. 陸委會(2007)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  91. 陸委會(2008)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  92. 陸委會(2009)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  93. 陸委會(2010)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  94. 陸委會(2011)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  95. 陸委會(2012)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  96. 陸委會(2013)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  97. 陸委會(2014)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  98. 陸委會(2015)。兩岸經濟統計月報
  99. 游盈隆(2012)。天人交戰:2012 台灣總統選民的抉擇。台北=Taipei:允晨=Yun Chen。
  100. 游清鑫編(2009)。民意調查新論。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wunan。
  101. 童振源(2011)。臺灣的中國戰略:從扈從到平衡。臺北=Taipei:新銳文創=Independent & Unique。
  102. 黃秀端(1994)。經濟情況與選民投票抉擇。東吳政治學報,3,97-123。
  103. 群策會(2004)。兩岸交流與國家安全群策會「兩岸交流與國家安全」國際研討會論文集,台北=Taipei:
  104. 趙建民(1994)。兩岸互動與外交競逐。台北=Taipei:永業=Yung-yeh。
  105. 劉震濤、江成岩、王建芬、張娟(2006)。招商引資-對臺經濟合作方法和策略。北京=Beijing:清華大學出版社=Tsingua University Press。
Times Cited
  1. 楊仕樂、李宜芳(2018)。兩岸九二共識的台灣不共識?網路問卷調查研究。國際關係學報,45,47-95。
  2. 關弘昌(2018)。臺灣青年世代統獨與兩岸經貿交流態度之探索。遠景基金會季刊,19(2),1-40。
  3. (2018)。國家利益之新聞框架以臺灣四大報的亞投行新聞報導為例。香港社會科學學報,51,125-171。