Title

教育評鑑的效用性:促進組織學習的觀點

Translated Titles

Educational Evaluation Use: Perspective of Promoting Organizational Learning

DOI

10.7044/NHCUEA.200912.0057

Authors

鄭淑惠(Shu-Huei Cheng)

Key Words

教育評鑑 ; 評鑑效用性 ; 組織學習 ; 學習導向的評鑑 ; educational evaluation ; evaluation use ; organizational learning ; learning-oriented evaluation

PublicationName

新竹教育大學教育學報

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

26卷2期(2009 / 12 / 01)

Page #

57 - 88

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

「評鑑效用性」係探究評鑑功能之發揮,爲評鑑領域的重要理論之一。近年來,因應教育改革思潮以及相關政策、法令之制定,使得我國教育評鑑辦理的數量增加。在教育革新的脈絡下,評鑑如何擴大效用性,扮演促進組織學習的角色,值得重視。目前國內相關議題的研究甚少,爲了探究以教育評鑑促進組織學習的效用性,本文將分述教育評鑑效用性與組織學習的相關概念,其次,分析以教育評鑑促進組織學習的實施做法與相關因素,接著,歸納相關實徵研究結果,最後,提出綜合分析發現與建議。

English Abstract

Evaluation use, an inquiry to how evaluation exerts effects, is one major focus of evaluation theories. In Taiwan, the number of educational evaluations has increased due to recent educational reforms and policy changes. More emphasis should be put on evaluation use, especially on the role which evaluation plays to facilitate organizational learning, in response to the needs of educational innovation. There is a lack of research in this field in Taiwan. To explore this issue, this study investigates the concepts of educational evaluation use and organizational learning. Then, the study analyzes the evaluation process to facilitate organizational learning. Furthermore, the study conducts a literature review in terms of an analytical framework. The study finally proposes conclusions and suggestions.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. 李瑞娥(2005)。學校組織學習、組織創新與學校效能的關係。高雄師大學報,18,45-59。
    連結:
  2. 陳冠年、林蓓君、孫浩章、蔡文惠(2008)。圖書館的挑戰:經由評鑑促進組織學習。大學圖書館,12(2),42-78。
    連結:
  3. 魏惠娟、林怡禮、潘慧玲、張明輝、陳嘉彌(2003)。驅動學校組織學習的因素分析。教育研究集刊,12,153-189。
    連結:
  4. Alkin, M. C.,Christie, C. A.,M. C. Alkin (Ed.)(2004).Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  5. Alkin, M. C.,Taut, S. M.(2003).Unbundling evaluation use.Studies in Educational Evaluation,29(1),1-12.
  6. Amo, C.,Cousins, J. B.(2007).Going through the process: An examination of the oprationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation,116,5-26.
  7. Argyris, C.,Schon, D. A.(1978).Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Menlo Park, CA:Addison-Wesley.
  8. Chen, K.(2007).Institutional evaluation and its influence on organizational learning.New Information Perspectives,59(1),5-25.
  9. Chen, K.(2006).Library evaluation and organizational learning: A questionnaire study.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,38(2),93-104.
  10. Chen, K.,Lin, P.(2008).Organizational learning in the evaluation procedure: A qualitative study.College & Research Libraries,38,36-49.
  11. Cherin, D.,Meezan, W.(1998).Evaluation as a means of organizational learning.Administration in Social Work,22(2),1-21.
  12. Collinson, V.,Cook, T. F.,Conley, S.(2006).Organizational learning in schools and school systems: Improving learning, teaching, and leading.Theory into Practice,45(2),107-116.
  13. Cousins, J. B.,Goh, S. C.,Clark, S.,Lee, L. E.(2004).Integrating evaluative inquiry into the organizational culture: A review and synthesis of the knowledge base.The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation,19(2),99-141.
  14. Cousins, J. B.,K. Leithwood (Eds.),K. S. Louis (Eds.)(1998).Organizational learning in schools.Lisse, The Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger.
  15. Crossan, M. M.,Lane, H. W.,White, R. E.(1999).An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution.Academy of Management Review,24(3),522-537.
  16. Daft, R. L.,Huber, G. P.,N. DiTomaso (Eds.),S. B. Bacharach (Eds.)(1987).Research in the Sociology of Organizations.Greenwich, CT:JAI.
  17. Fitzpatrick, J. L.,Sanders, J. R.,Worthen, B. R.(2004).Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  18. Forss, K.,Cracknell, B.,Samset, K.(1994).Can evaluation help an organization to learn?.Evaluation Review,18(5),574-591.
  19. Forss, K.,Rebien, C. C.,Clarlsson, J.(2002).Process use of evaluations: Types of use that precede lessons learned and feedback.Evaluation,8(1),29-45.
  20. Greene, J. G.(1988).Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation.Evaluation Review,12(2),91-116.
  21. Guba, E. G.,Lincoln, Y. S.(1989).Fourth generation evaluation.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  22. Henry, G. T.,Mark, M. M.(2003).Beyond use: Understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions.American Journal of Evaluation,23(3),293-314.
  23. Hofstetter, C. H.,Alkin, M. C.,T. Kellaghan (Eds.),D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
  24. Hopkins, D.(1989).Evaluation for school development.Philadelphia:Open University Press.
  25. Huber, G. P.(1991).Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literatures.Organization Science,2(1),88-115.
  26. Johnson, R. B.(1998).Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization.Evaluation and Program Planning,21,93-110.
  27. King, J. A.(2004).How viable is evaluation capacity building in schools that give standardized tests?.Paper presented at the meeting of the Virginia Association of Test Directors.
  28. Kirkhart, K. E.(2000).Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence.New Directions for Evaluation,88,5-23.
  29. Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.,Steibach, R.,K. Leithwood (Eds.),K. S. Louis (Eds.)(1998).Organizational learning in schools.Lisse, The Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger.
  30. Leithwood, K.,Louis, K. S.,K. Leithwood (Eds.),K. S. Louis (Eds.)(1998).Organizational learning in schools.Lisse, The Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger.
  31. Mark, M. M.,Henry, G. T.(2004).The mechanisms of outcomes of evaluation influence.Evaluation,10(1),35-57.
  32. Mezirow, J.(1991).Transformative dimensions of adult learning.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  33. Morgan, G.(1986).Images of organization.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  34. Owen, J. M.(2007).Program evaluation: Forms and approaches.New York:Guilford.
  35. Patton, M. Q.(1997).Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  36. Patton, M. Q.(1998).Discovering process use.Evaluation,4(2),225-223.
  37. Preskill, H.(2008).Evaluation's second act: A spotlight on learning.American Journal of Evaluation,29(2),127-138.
  38. Preskill, H.,S. Mathison (Ed.)(2005).Encyclopedia of evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  39. Preskill, H.,Torres, R. T.(1999).Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  40. Preskill, H.,Torres, R. T.,M. Easterby-Smith (Eds.),J. Burgoyne (Eds.),L. Araujo (Eds.)(1999).Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice.London:Sage.
  41. Preskill, H.,Zuckerman, B.,Matthews, B.(2003).An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for further research.American Journal of Evaluation,24(4),423-442.
  42. Reeve, J.,Peerbhoy, D.(2007).Evaluating the evaluation: Understanding the utility and limitations of evaluation as a tool for organizational learning.Health Education Journal,66(2),120-131.
  43. Robinson, T. T.,Cousins, J. B.(2004).Internal participatory evaluation as an organizational learning: A longitudinal case study.Studies in Educational Evaluation,30(1),1-22.
  44. Rogers, P. J.,Williams, B.,I. F. Shaw (Eds.),J. C. Greene (Eds.),M. M. Mark (Eds.)(2006).The Sage handbook of evaluation.London:Sage.
  45. Rossman, G. B.,Rallis, S. F.(2000).Critical inquiry and use as action.New Directions for Evaluation,88,56-69.
  46. Russ-Eft, D.,Preskill, H.(2001).Evaluation in organization: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change.Cambridge, MA:Perseus.
  47. Sanders, J. R.(2003).Mainstreaming evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation,99,3-6.
  48. Scriven, M.,M. C. Alkin (Ed.)(2004).Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  49. Senge, P.(1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York:Currency/Doubleday.
  50. Shadish, W. R.,Cook, T. D.,Leviton, L. C.(1991).Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice.Newbury, CA:Sage.
  51. Stockdill, S. H.,Baizerman, M.,Compton, D. W.(2002).Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature.New Directions for Evaluation,93,7-26.
  52. Institutionalizing evaluation checklist
  53. Stufflebeam, D. L.,T. Kellaghan (Eds.),D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.),L. A. Wingate (Eds.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation: Part Two: Practice.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer.
  54. Thornton, B.,Shepperson, T.,Canavero, S.(2007).A systems approach to school improvement: Program evaluation and organizational learning.Education,128(1),48-55.
  55. Torres, R. T.,Preskill, H.(2001).Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present, and future.American Journal of Evaluation,22(3),387-395.
  56. Torres, R. T.,Preskill, H.,Piontek, M. E.(2005).Evaluation strategies for communicating and reporting: Enhancing learning in organization.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  57. 江惠真(2009)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班。
  58. 吳明烈(2008)。組織學習的發展趨勢與變革策略之探究。教育政策論壇,11(4),90-123。
  59. 林天佑、張明輝主編(2004)。教育政策與教育革新。臺北市:心理。
  60. 林慧蓉(2007)。組織學習理念在教師專業發展評鑑之應用。初等教育學刊,26,43-64。
  61. 夏林清譯、鄭村棋譯、C. Argyris著、D. A. Schon著(2006)。組織學習-理論、方法與實踐(Organizational Learning Ⅱ)。臺北市:遠流。
  62. 秦夢群(1997)。教育行政(理論部分)。臺北市:五南。
  63. 郭昭佑(2007)。教育評鑑研究:原罪與釋放。臺北市:五南。
  64. 郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北市:五南。
  65. 黃乃熒(2000)。後現代教育行政哲學。臺北市:師大書苑。
  66. 楊振昇(2006)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。臺北市:五南。
  67. 楊智雄(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
  68. 潘慧玲(2002)。學校革新理念與實踐。臺北市:學富。
  69. 潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育評鑑:回顧與前瞻。「教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會」會議論文集,臺北市:
  70. 潘慧玲、吳武典主編、高強華主編(2006)。優質、創新與前瞻-郭為藩教授七秩華誕祝壽論文輯。臺北市:學富。
  71. 鄭淑惠、中華民國師範教育學會主編(2007)。教師評鑑與專業成長。臺北市:心理。
  72. 盧偉斯(2002)。組織學習理論發展評析。中國行政,71,17-43。
  73. 盧增緒、中國教育學會主編(1995)。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。
  74. 謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。
  75. 謝文全、林新發、張德銳、張明輝(1998)。教育行政學。臺北縣:國立空中大學。
  76. 魏惠娟(2002)。學習型學校-從概念到實踐。臺北市:五南。
  77. 魏惠娟(2007)。學校組織成員學習:規劃架構與成效指標。教育研究月刊,153,52-61。
  78. 蘇錦麗(2004)。展望我國教育評鑑專業之發展。「教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會」會議論文集,臺北市:
Times Cited
  1. 周士琦(2014)。高職學校行政主管對學校評鑑使用及其影響因素知覺之研究。臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所學位論文。2014。1-313。 
  2. 張淑涵(2011)。驅動學校發展的資料運用:一所公立高中之實踐經驗。臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所學位論文。2011。1-121。
  3. 彭慧婷(2011)。國民小學教師專業發展評鑑與教師專業成長關係之研究。政治大學教育行政與政策研究所學位論文。2011。1-166。
  4. 張乃穎(2015)。以DEMATEL探討影響我國高級中學學校評鑑結果之關鍵因素。中正大學經濟系國際經濟研究所學位論文。2015。1-52。