透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.161.116
  • 期刊

我國役齡男子之足弓參數邏輯迴歸分析

An Arch Parameters Analysis of Taiwan Soldiers with Flatfeet and Normalfeet by Logistic Regression

摘要


The Taiwan Army's soldiers with flatfeet had sports injuries while accepting long-term training. They would have the risk of dangers even though that they did not reach the criterion (the angle of fifth metatarsal-calcaneus>165°). Therefore, We recruited the subjects aged from 18 to 25 males (flat 172.3±4.8cm, 67.0±7.6kg, 56 feet and normal 176.2±6.6cm, 69.6±9.6kg, 30 feet) through calculate parameter of footprints, and examined the foot parameters in order to find out more proper and easier standard of judgment. Then t-test (α=.05) was used to differentiate between the normalfooted and flatfooted (X-ray>165°). This study also constructed a test of criterion-referenced in nine measurement indexes, by logistic regression analysis establishment formula (according to standards AI>0.26, AI>0.30, X-rays > 165). Three findings were obtained. First, there was a best logistic regression analysis establishment formula: that is, Logit p=9.072+(-8.282)× Arch Leight Ratio. It reached 82.9% of the explanation strength. Secand, the probability of predicting the flatfooted reached 82.9%. It showed that the prediction accuracy was high, ROC curve (Receiver Operating Characteristic curve), and rises fast demonstrated the Logistic pattern quality and prediction of the accuracy were high. Therefore, it was suggested that was a good and easy way to measure the footprints by Arch Leight Ratio for the Army and the shoes designers to discriminate flatfooted from the normal. Third, there were significant differences (p<.05) on dorsum of foot (N/F7.76±0.62/7.13±0.78), on the angle (M5-calcaneus) (N/F156.18±5.43/167.22±3.60) by X-ray, Arch Index (N/ F0.28±0.05/ 0.34±0.05), and Arch Length Ratio (N/F1.249±0.384/0.22±0.67) between the normal and the flatfooted. There were no significant differences on Arch Ratio (N/F0.37±0.03/0.36±0.04). It meaned that there were different results in judging flatfeet by the Arch Leight Ratio and X-ray. We suggested that many ways of Arch indexes of feet need to be researched and discussed.

並列摘要


The Taiwan Army's soldiers with flatfeet had sports injuries while accepting long-term training. They would have the risk of dangers even though that they did not reach the criterion (the angle of fifth metatarsal-calcaneus>165°). Therefore, We recruited the subjects aged from 18 to 25 males (flat 172.3±4.8cm, 67.0±7.6kg, 56 feet and normal 176.2±6.6cm, 69.6±9.6kg, 30 feet) through calculate parameter of footprints, and examined the foot parameters in order to find out more proper and easier standard of judgment. Then t-test (α=.05) was used to differentiate between the normalfooted and flatfooted (X-ray>165°). This study also constructed a test of criterion-referenced in nine measurement indexes, by logistic regression analysis establishment formula (according to standards AI>0.26, AI>0.30, X-rays > 165). Three findings were obtained. First, there was a best logistic regression analysis establishment formula: that is, Logit p=9.072+(-8.282)× Arch Leight Ratio. It reached 82.9% of the explanation strength. Secand, the probability of predicting the flatfooted reached 82.9%. It showed that the prediction accuracy was high, ROC curve (Receiver Operating Characteristic curve), and rises fast demonstrated the Logistic pattern quality and prediction of the accuracy were high. Therefore, it was suggested that was a good and easy way to measure the footprints by Arch Leight Ratio for the Army and the shoes designers to discriminate flatfooted from the normal. Third, there were significant differences (p<.05) on dorsum of foot (N/F7.76±0.62/7.13±0.78), on the angle (M5-calcaneus) (N/F156.18±5.43/167.22±3.60) by X-ray, Arch Index (N/ F0.28±0.05/ 0.34±0.05), and Arch Length Ratio (N/F1.249±0.384/0.22±0.67) between the normal and the flatfooted. There were no significant differences on Arch Ratio (N/F0.37±0.03/0.36±0.04). It meaned that there were different results in judging flatfeet by the Arch Leight Ratio and X-ray. We suggested that many ways of Arch indexes of feet need to be researched and discussed.

參考文獻


王順正(1997)。運動技術分析-運動生物力學研究。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
王錫崗、麥麗敏、祁業榮、廖美華、鍾麗琴、戴瑄、黃玉琪(1999)。簡明解剖生理學。台北市:匯華圖書。
姚漢禱(2004)。體育統計。台北市:師大書苑。
王順正(1997)。運動技術分析-運動生物力學研究。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
王錫崗、麥麗敏、祁業榮、廖美華、鍾麗琴、戴誼、黃玉琪(1999)。簡明解剖生理學。台北市:匯華圖書。

被引用紀錄


廖芫雅(2010)。成人扁平足症狀分析〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0003-2006201016424700
謝仕福(2011)。北台灣體育班及非體育班學生的足部結構差異調查〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315253558

延伸閱讀