Title

科學民主化與水資源開發爭議-高屏大湖之個案研究

Translated Titles

Democratization of Science and Water Resource Development: The Case of the KaoPing Great Lakes Project

Authors

蔡旻霈(Min-Pei Tsai);范玫芳(Mei-Fang Fan)

Key Words

科學民主化 ; 環境影響評估 ; 公民參與 ; 水資源政策 ; 高屏大湖 ; democratizing of science ; citizen science ; environmental impact assessment ; public participation ; water resources policy ; the KaoPing Great Lakes

PublicationName

臺灣民主季刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

11卷1期(2014 / 03 / 01)

Page #

1 - 40

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

八八風災後,越域引水工程停擺,南化、曾文水庫嚴重淤積,水利署於2010年提出高屏大湖計畫試圖減緩未來高屏地區缺水危機,引起諸多爭議。本研究旨在檢視高屏大湖開發案爭議,探討在地居民如何感知開發案的潛在危害、地方知識論述如何挑戰官方與專家知識可信度、公民行動如何影響環評審查以及在科學民主化的意涵。在地居民質疑興建人工湖可能引發並惡化當地淹水、搶奪地下水及農業灌溉用水、衝擊當地農業發展與自然生態,以及人工湖設計對地下水文的潛在影響。地方居民基於長年的生活經驗與對地下水位的觀察,提供地方脈絡與處境的專業知識,透過與環保團體、研究當地水文的水利專家結盟,長期交流合作下形構出緊密的互動網絡,進而對開發單位及主張大型水利發開的專家論述提出挑戰,提倡地下水補注工法作為未來水資源開發的可行方向,並在環境影響評估與決策過程中發揮關鍵性的影響力。

English Abstract

After Typhoon Morakot, the water diversion project was shut down, and the Water Resources Agency proposed the KaoPing Great Lakes project. This study examines the controversy on the KaoPing Great Lakes project, and explores local residents' knowledge claims, citizen action and its implication for democratization of science. Local residents, environmental groups and civic water conservancy experts, built alliances and configured a close interaction network through long-term exchanges and cooperation. They challenged the large-scale water conservancy development discourses and proposed a groundwater recharge program as a potential and feasible future water resource development project. Local activism has contributed to the knowledge production of environmental impact assessment and plays a crucial role in decision-making processes.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 政治學
Reference
  1. 周任芸譯、Wynne, Brian(2007)。風險社會、不確定性和科學民主化─STS的未來。科技、醫療與社會,5,15-42。
    連結:
  2. 周桂田(2013)。全球化風險挑戰下發展型國家之治理創新—以台灣公民知識監督決策為分析。政治與社會哲學評論,44,65-148。
    連結:
  3. 周桂田(2007)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論,22,173-233。
    連結:
  4. 湯京平、邱崇原(2010)。專業與民主—台灣環境影響評估制度的運作與調適。公共行政學報,35,1-28。
    連結:
  5. 雷祥麟(2002)。劇變中的科技、民主與社會—STS(科技與社會研究)的挑戰。台灣社會研究季刊,45,123-71。
    連結:
  6. (2004)。科技渴望性別。台北=Taipei:群學=Socio Publishing Co. Ltd.。
  7. 丁澈士(2006)。〈剖析吉洋人工湖〉,《三月份STS電子報》,台灣科技與社會研究學會。http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/81551945?access_key=key-250k8yoga8dn4v1vxgof。2012/12/22。(Cheh-shyh Ting [2006]. “The Analysis of the Ji Yang Artificial Lake.” The STS March Newsletter. Association for Science, Technology and Society of Taiwan. http://www.scribdcom/fullscreen/81551945?access_key=key-250k8yoga8dn4v1vxgof [accessed December 22, 2012].)
  8. 台灣立報(2012)。〈開發高屏大湖,農民:根本沒必要〉,台灣立報。http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-123363。2012/10/30。(Lihpao Daily [2012]. “Farmers: the KaoPing Great Lakes Project is Unnecessary.” Lihpao Daily. http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-123363 [accessed October 30, 2012].)
  9. 台灣環境保護聯盟(2010)。〈吉洋人工湖案達161億、存在眾多爭議,要求行政院應先進行環差才能核定計畫〉,台灣境保護聯盟。http://www.tepu.org.tw/?p=3046。2013/1/10。(Taiwan Environmental Protection Union [2010]. “The Controversial Ji Yang Artificial Lake Costs 16.1 Billion Dollars: The Executive Yuan Needs to Undertake the Environmental Variance Analysis.” Taiwan Environmental Protection Union. http://www.tepu.org.tw/?p=3046[accessed January 10, 2013].)
  10. 地球公民基金會(2013)。〈艱苦但意外的勝利!環評會否決高屏大湖開發案〉,苦勞網。http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/73227。2013/3/27。(Citizen of the earth, Taiwan [2013]. “Hard but Unexpected Victory! The Environmental Impact Assessment Committee Vetoes the KaoPing Great Lakes Project.” Labor network. http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/73227 [accessed March 27, 2013].)
  11. 朱淑娟(2010)。〈穩定南部供水條例,夾帶吉洋人工湖三讀過關。環保團體:反對霸王法、反對債留子孫〉,環境報導。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2010/04/blog-post_16.html。2012/11/20。(Shu-chuan Chu[2010]. “The Regulation of Stable Southern Water Supply Entrained Ji Yang Artificial Lake Project Has Been Passed. Environmental Groups Oppose Against the Rude Bill and Debt Left Descendants.” Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2010/04/blog-post_16.html [accessed November 20, 2012].)
  12. 朱淑娟(2011)。〈反不當開發吉洋人工湖、美濃水庫 水利署:南部要有備用水源〉,環境報導。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2011/05/blog-post.html。2012/7/3。(Shu-chuan Chu [2011]. “Opposition to the Ji Yang Artificial Lakes and Mino Reservoirs. Water Resources Agency: the South Needs to Have Spare Water.” Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2011/05/blog-post.html [accessed July 3, 2012].)
  13. 朱淑娟(2012)。〈爭議10年,高屏大湖重啟環差審查,開發必要性成爭論焦點〉,環境資訊中心。http://e-info.org.tw/node/77514。2012/6/8。(Shu-chuan Chu [2012]. “The KaoPing Great Lakes Project Restarts the Review of Environmental Variance analysis: The Necessity Become the Main Debate.” Taiwan Environment Information Center. http://e-info.org.tw/node/77514 [accessed June 8, 2012].)
  14. 朱淑娟(2013a)。〈高屏大湖環差,關關難過關關過〉,環境報導。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2013/01/blog-post_8007.html。2013/1/10。(Shu-chuan Chu [2013a]. “Environmental Variance Analysis of the KaoPing Great Lakes Project: Overcome Difficulties.” Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2013/01/blog-post_8007.html [accessed January 10, 2012].)
  15. 呂苡榕(2013)。〈高屏大湖審查,主席:兩案併陳送環評〉,台灣立報。http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20130109/8736692.html。2013/1/17。(Yi-rong Lu [2013]. “The Review of the KaoPing Great Lakes: Two Proposals Submitted to Environmental Impact Assessment.” Lihpao Daily. http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20130109/8736692.html [accessed January 17, 2013].)
  16. 沛云(2013)。〈讓解說成為一種社會運動,訪導覽協會解說員、反吉洋人工湖大將—「老爹」〉,上下游News & Market。http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/23191/。2013/3/14。(Yun Pei [2013]. “ Introduction to the Critical Activist of Anti-Ji Yang Artificial Lake: “Lao Die.”“Upstream and Downstream News & Market.” http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/23191/[accessed March 14, 2013].)
  17. 屏東縣里港鄉公所(2013)。〈地理環境〉,《認識里港》,屏東縣里港鄉公所。http://www.pthg.gov.tw/TownLto/CP.aspx?s=2066&cp=1&n=11726。2013/1/2。(Ligang Township Office [2013]. “Geographic Environment.” Recognizing Li-gang. Li-gang Township Office. http://www.pthg.gov.tw/TownLto/CP.aspx?s=2066&cp=1&n=11726[accessed January2, 2013].)
  18. 美濃民俗村(2000)。〈美濃簡介〉。http://www.meinung-folk-village.com.tw/about/index.htm。2013/1/2。(Meinung Folk Village [2000]. “The Brief Introduction.” http://www.meinung-folk-village.com.tw/about/index.htm [accessed January2, 2013].)
  19. 郭志榮、葉鎮中(2011)。〈我們的島,吉洋人工湖的利益〉,公視新聞議題中心。http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=30262。2012/12/10。(Zhi-rong Guo and Zhen-zhong Ye [2011]. “Our Island: Benefits of the Ji Yang Artificial Lake.”PTS News Network. http://pnn. pts.org.tw/main/?p=30262 [accessed December 10, 2012].)
  20. 陳韋綸(2012)。〈吉洋人工湖更名闖關環評調豐濟枯?居民憂淹缺水通通來〉,苦勞網。http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/66524。2012/6/24。(Wei-lun Chen[2012]. “Ji Yang Artificial Lake Changed Its Name and Attempted to Pass the EIA Review: Local Residents Worry Flooding and Water Shortage.” Labor network. http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/66524 [accessed June 24, 2012].)
  21. 經濟部水利署南部水資源局(2012)。〈高屏大湖民眾建言和疑慮解答〉。高雄:經濟部水利署南部水資源局。http://www.wrasb.gov.tw/multimedia/multimedia02.aspx?type=2&no=22&pno=。2012/9/5。(The South Region Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs [2012]. “The KaoPing Great Lakes Project: Public Suggestion and Q&A.” Kaohsiung: South Region Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs. http://www.wrasb.gov.tw/multimedia/multimedia02.aspx?type=2&no=22&pno= [accessed September 5, 2012].)
  22. 劉力仁(2012)。〈高屏大湖環差審查會,屏東農抗議〉,自由時報電子報。http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/oct/31/today-life10.htm?Slots=BLife。2012/10/31。(Li-ren Liu [2012]. “The Review of the Environmental Variance Analysis of the KaoPing Great Lakes: Farmers of Pingtung Protest.” The Liberty Times. http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012//new/oct/31/today-life10.htm?Slots=BLife [accessed October 31, 2012].)
  23. 劉力仁(2013)。〈高屏大湖環評審查,環評委員退回〉,自由時報電子報。http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=777314&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB。2013/3/15。(Li-ren Liu [2013]. “The KaoPing Great Lakes Project does not Pass the EIA Review.” The Liberty Times. http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=777314&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB [accessed March 15, 2013].)
  24. 樓乃潔(2012)。〈鏟毛豆田挖高屏大湖,農民抗議,環差補件再審〉,苦勞網。http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/71303。2012/10/31。(Nai-jei Lou[2012]. “Farmers Protest Against the KaoPing Great Lakes Project: Re-review of the Supplementary Documents of Environmental Variance Analysis.” Labor network. http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/71303 [accessed October 31, 2012].)
  25. 魯台營(2011)。〈以生態取水取代堰壩,『急需改變』的台灣取水的思惟〉, 高雄市綠色協會。https://sites.google.com/site/tga14051/1992-2011----------16-----12httpurlzoomrccpm1iehttpurlzoomrcc3osdl-40502020-30003001620115123051992-2011。2012/12/19。(Tai-ying Lu [2011]. “To Replace Barrages with Ecological Ways: The Thinking of Water resource Development Needs to Change.” Takao Green Association for Ecology and Humane Studies. https://sites.google.com/site/tga14051/1992-2011----------16-----12httpurlzoomrccpm1iehttpurlzoomrcc3osdl-40502020-30003001620115123051992-2011[accessed December 19, 2012].)
  26. 魏紜鈴(2013a)。〈高屏大湖開發必要性挑戰多〉,大紀元。http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/13/3/13/n3821409.htm。2013/3/27。(Yun-ling Wei [2013a]. “KaoPing Great Lakes Development Project Faces Great Challenges.”Epoch Times. http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/13/3/13/n3821409.htm [accessed March 27,2013].)
  27. 魏紜鈴(2013b)。〈高屏大湖審查 兩案並陳送環評〉,中央日報。http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=108&docid=102168766。2013/1/13。(Yun-ling Wei[2013b]. “The Review of KaoPing Great Lakes: Two Proposals Submitted to Environmental Impact Assessment.” Central Daily News. http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=108&docid=102168766 [accessed January 13, 2013].)
  28. 鐘聖雄(2012)。〈高屏大湖再闖關,地下水疑慮難解〉,公視新聞議題中心。http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=38834。2012/9/10。(Sheng-xiong Zhong [2012]. “The Groundwater Controversy of the KaoPing Great Lakes Remains Unsolved.” PTS Newsnetwork. http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=38834 [accessed September 10, 2012].)
  29. 立法院(2010)。〈立法院公報第100卷第24期委員會紀錄〉,議事暨公報管理系統。http://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/lcivCommQry.action#pageName_searchResult=1。2012/11/15。(The Legislative Yuan [2010]. “Legislative Committee Report, Vol. 100, No. 24.” Parliamentary procedural and communique management system. http://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/lcivCommQry.action#pageName_searchResult=1 [accessed November 15, 2012].)
  30. 公共電視南部開講(2012)。〈良田變人工湖?毛豆還能賺外匯?〉,Youtube。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea4XuqTfCXw。2012/11/30。(PTS Focus on Southern Part [2012]. “Fertile Land Becomes Artificial Lake? Could Green Soy Bean Earn Foreign Exchange?” Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea4XuqTfCXw[accessed November 30, 2012].)
  31. 公視晚間新聞(2010)。〈高雄—屏東水利署計畫高屏大湖,穩定南部供水〉。http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRIYUG_0W5s。2012/9/30。(PTS Nightly News [2011]. “KaoPing Great Lakes for Stable Water Supply in Southern Taiwan.”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRIYUG_0W5s [accessed September 30, 2012].)
  32. 客家夜間新聞(2010)。〈高屏大湖爭議〉,客家電視。http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxWfvcVUmBQ。2012/8/24。(Hakka Nightly News [2010]. “The Controversies over the KaoPing Great Lakes Project.” Hakka TV. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxWfvcVUmBQ [accessed August 24, 2012].)
  33. 客家新聞雜誌(2012)。〈181集—「水庫.水枯系列報導(三)水庫之外」〉,客家電視。http://blog.roodo.com/hakkaweekly/archives/12749677.html。2012/6/24。(Hakka News [2010]. “Reports on Reservoirs and Water Shortage.” Hakka TV. http://blog.roodo.com/hakkaweekly/archives/12749677.html [accessed June 24, 2013].)
  34. 美濃愛鄉協進會(2006)。《美濃文化造鎮總體規劃案》。高雄:美濃愛鄉協進會。(Meinung People's Association[2006]. The Proposal of Building Communities Through Culture in Meinung. Kaohsiung: Meinung People's Association.)。
  35. Collins, Harry,Evans, Robert(2007).Rethinking Expertise.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  36. Collins, Harry,Evans, Robert(2002).The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.Social Studies of Science,32(2),235-96.
  37. Fiorino, Daniel J.(1990).Citizen participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.Science, Technology & Human Values,15(2),226-43.
  38. Guston, David H.(2004).Forget Politicizing Science. Let's Democratize Science.Issues in Science and Technology,21(1),25-28.
  39. Hackett, Edward J.(ed.),Amsterdamska, Olga(ed.),Lynch, Michael(ed.),Wajcman, Judy(ed.)(2008).The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.Cambridge:MIT.
  40. Jasanoff, Sheila(2003).Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans.Social Studies of Science,33(3),389-400.
  41. McCormick, Sabrina(2007).Democratizing Science Movements: A New Framework for Mobilization and Contestation.Social Studies of Science,37(4),609-23.
  42. Rowe, Gene,Frewer, Lynn J.(2000).Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.Science, Technology & Human Values,25(1),3-29.
  43. Wynne, Brian(2008).Elephants in the Rooms Where Publics Encounter 'Science'?: A Response to Darrin Durant, 'Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public'.Public Understanding of Science,17(1),21-33.
  44. Wynne, Brian(2003).Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins and Evans (2002).Social Studies of Science,33(3),401-17.
  45. 朱淑娟(2013)。環評會主席,明著護航爭議水庫?。商業週刊,1313
  46. 何明修(2006)。綠色民主。台北=Taipei:群學=Socio Publishing Co. Ltd.。
  47. 何明修(2003)。自主與依賴─比較反核四運動與反美濃水庫運動中的政治交換模式。台灣社會學刊,30,1-49。
  48. 吳泉源(1999)。國科會研究計畫國科會研究計畫,台北=Taipei:國科會=National Science Council。
  49. 林福岳(2002)。認同建構為傳播基礎概念之初探—以美濃反水庫運動為例。中華傳播學刊,2,47-99。
  50. 邱文聰(2010)。科學研究自由與第三波科學民主化的挑戰─對「知識憲法」與「政治憲法」二分的一個批判考察。科技發展與法律規範雙年刊─科學管制、學術研究自由與多元民主價值
  51. 高雄市綠色協會(2000)。水的故鄉—國際「人工湖與地下水補注研討會」,高雄=Kaohsiung:
  52. 張高傑(2001)。新竹=Hsinchu,國立清華大學社會學研究所=Institute of Sociology, Nation Tsing-Hua University。
  53. 曾貴海(2000)。被喚醒的河流。台中=Taichung:晨星=Chen Sing。
  54. 經濟部水利署南部水資源局(2010)。,高雄=Kaohsiung:經濟部水利署南區水資源局=The South Region Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
  55. 葉蓓華(1991)。台北=Taipei,國立政治大學公共行政系=Department of Public Administration, National Chengchi University。
  56. 蔡淑玲(2011)。台南=Tainan,國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所=Graduate Institute of Political Economy, National Cheng Kung University。
  57. 鍾怡婷(2003)。高雄=Kaohsiung,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所=Institute of Public Affairs Management, National Sun Yat-sen University。
Times Cited
  1. 曾玟學(2015)。氣候變遷下臺灣水資源開發與產業用水之衝突。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。2015。1-170。 
  2. 陳惠萍(2015)。綠能科技與在地使用:台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡分析。臺灣大學社會學研究所學位論文。2015。1-166。