Title

高中軟式網球選手知覺教練領導行爲對選手滿意度影響之研究

Translated Titles

Effects of Perceived Coach Leadership Behaviors on Players' Satisfaction in Interscholastic Soft Tennis Players

DOI

10.6213/JLRIM.2008.1(3)3

Authors

雷文谷(Wen-Guu Lei);熊婉君(Wan-Chun Hsiung);蕭勝豪(Sheng-Hao Shiao);宋威穎(Wei-Ying Sung);盧君偉(Jun-Wei Lu)

Key Words

軟式網球選手 ; 教練領導行爲 ; 滿意度 ; soft tennis players ; coach leadership behavior ; degree of satisfaction

PublicationName

休閒產業管理學刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

1卷3期(2008 / 12 / 01)

Page #

29 - 43

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究旨在探討高中軟式網球選手知覺教練領導行爲對選手滿意度之影響,並以參加第三十一屆全國中正盃軟式網球錦標賽高中團體組選手爲研究對象,透過立意取樣方式共發出80份問卷,回收有效問卷64份,研究發現如下:1.選手知覺教練領導行爲以「訓練與指導行爲」得分最高,而知覺「專制行爲」得分最低。2.參賽選手之滿意度以「對教練整體指導行爲」得分最高,而以「對個人運動成就表現」的得分最低。3.不同性別選手在知覺教練領導行爲的「獎勵行爲」、「專制行爲」與「民主行爲」上達顯著差異;不同個人最高運動成就選手在知覺教練領導行爲的「關懷行爲」達顯著差異;而不同(一週)訓練時數選手在知覺教練領導行爲上則無顯著差異存在。4.在選手滿意度方面,結果顯示不同性別、個人最高運動成就選手在「對個人運動成就表現」滿意度上達顯著差異;不同(一週)訓練時數選手在選手滿意度上均顯著差異存在。5.高中軟式網球選手知覺教練領導行爲中的「關懷行爲」及「獎勵行爲」最能有效預測選手之整體滿意度。

English Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of perceived coach leadership behaviors on high school soft tennis players' satisfaction. Team players from each high school team who participated in the 31st National CKS Cup of Soft Tennis Competition were the study targets and a total of 80 questionnaires were distributed. There were 64 effective questionnaires with a retrieval rate of 80%. The results are as follows: (1) Among the 5 phases that constituted perceived coach leadership behaviors for high school soft tennis players, ”training and instructing behavior” received the highest score. This is followed by ”caring behavior”, ”democratic behavior”, and ”encouraging behavior”, whereas ”tyrannical behavior” received the lowest score. (2) Among the 4 phases that constituted satisfaction of high school soft tennis players, ”overall instructing behavior of coach” received the highest score for level of satisfaction. This is followed by ”overall performance of the team” and ”performance of team results”, where ”performance of personal sport achievement” received the lowest score for level of satisfaction. (3) Regarding analysis on the ”different perceived coach leadership behaviors for high school soft tennis players from diverse backgrounds” variable, the results indicated that players of different genders reached noticeable differences for ”encouragement behavior”, ”tyrannical behavior” and ”democratic behavior” within the perceived coach leadership behaviors. Players under highest sports achievement for individual diversity reached noticeable differences for ”caring behavior” within perceived coach leadership behaviors. As for players from different training hours a week, there were no obvious differences within the perceived coach leadership behaviors. (4) Among analytical results on differentiation of ”satisfaction from high school soft tennis players of diverse backgrounds” variable, players of different genders, and the highest sports achievement reached obvious differences under ”performance of personal sports achievement” in the player's satisfaction measurement. As for players from different training hours a week, there were no obvious differences within the player's satisfaction measurement. (5) ”Caring behavior” and ”encouraging behavior” within perceived coach leadership behaviors showed a positive value; these are capable of effectively forecasting player's overall satisfaction.

Topic Category 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. Wu, H. C.(2000).A competitive study of collegiate coach’s leadership behavior in Taiwan.Abstract of North American Society for Sport Management 15th American Society for Sport.
    連結:
  2. 吳國銑(2000)。我國大專院校運動教練領導行爲比較研究。體育學報,28,59-68。
    連結:
  3. 吳慧卿(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,台灣師範大學體育研究所。
    連結:
  4. 李建平(2003)。大專網球優秀選手訓練滿意度之研究。體育學報,34,149-160。
    連結:
  5. 歐正明(2006)。羽球教領導行爲與選手滿意度之研究-以大專院校甲組球員爲例。運動休閒管理學報,3(2),167-189。
    連結:
  6. 簡瑞宇(2006)。大專網球選手知覺教練領導行爲對運動參與動機及訓練滿意度之影響。台灣運動心理學報,8,65-86。
    連結:
  7. Chelladurai, P.(1984).Discrepancy between preferences and preferred leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sport.Journal of Sport Psychology,6,27-41.
  8. Chelladurai, P.(1978).Canada,University of Waterloo.
  9. Chelladurai, P.,R. N. Singer(Eds.),M. Murphey(Eds.),L. K. Tennant(Eds.)(1993).Handbook of research on sport psychology.New York, NY:Macmillan.
  10. Chelladurai, P.,Saleh, S. D.(1978).Preferred leadership in sports.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,3,85-92.
  11. Fiedler, F. E.(1967).A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness.NY:McGraw Hill.
  12. Gordon, S.(1986).Canada,University of Alberta.
  13. Horne, T.,Carron, A.V.(1985).Compatibility in coach-athlete relationships.Journal of sport Psychology,7,137-149.
  14. House, R. J.(1971).A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly,16,321-338.
  15. Oliver, R. L.,DeSarbo, W. S.(1988).Response determinants in satisfaction judgement.Journal of Consumer Research,14(3),495-507.
  16. Osborn, R. N.,Hunt, J. G.(Eds.),L. L. Larson (Eds.)(1975).Leadership frontiers.OH:Kent State University.
  17. Riemer, H.,Chelladurai, P.(1995).Leadership and satisfaction in sport.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,17(3),276-293.
  18. Sabock, R. J.(1985).The coach.U.S.A.:Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
  19. Smoll, S.,Smith, R. E.(1989).Leadership behaviors in sport: A theoretical model and research paradigm.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,19,1522-1551.
  20. Weiss, M. R.,Friderichs, W. D.(1996).The influence of leader behavior, coach attributes, and institution variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,8,322-346.
  21. Yukl, G. A.(1981).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc..
  22. 呂建謀(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,中國文化大學運動教練研究所。
  23. 李建平(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
  24. 張滄彬(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,台北市立體育學院運動科學研究所。
  25. 陳玉娟(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
  26. 陳其昌(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣,國立體育學院教練研究所。
  27. 新浪新聞中心網
  28. 黃金柱(1990)。國家及教練領導行爲之調查研究。體育學院叢書,1(2),33-45。
  29. 黃英忠(1995)。現代管理學。台北:三民書局。
  30. 黃英貴(1984)。中華軟網八十年史。中華軟網雙月刊,4(25),2-7。
  31. 劉雅燕、鄭俊傑、洪敦賓(2006)。大學院校橄欖球隊教練領導行爲與滿意度之研究。淡江體育,9,114-127。
  32. 鄭志富(1995)。運動教練領導行爲研究。台北:師大書苑。
  33. 鄭志富(1997)。運動教練領導行爲模式分析。台灣師大體育研究,1,75-90。
  34. 鄭志富、方明營(1994)。大專院校足球教練領導行爲之研究。台北:漢文書局。
  35. 鄭松益(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
  36. 蕃薯藤運動網
  37. 蕭嘉惠、黃明玊(2002)。多元領導模式驗證研究-以花蓮地區大專院校爲例。體育學報,25,71-80。
  38. 賴世堤(1999)。大專院校田徑教練領導行爲之研究。大專體育學刊,1(2),111-128。
  39. 賴永倉(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,中國文化大學教練研究所。
  40. 羅如卿(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,中國文化大學運動教練研究所。
Times Cited
  1. 蘇士勛(2014)。我國直排輪曲棍球選手運動參與動機與滿意度之相關研究。長榮大學運動競技學系(所)學位論文。2014。1-109。 
  2. 廖敏竣(2017)。我國優秀選手參與不同訓練場所滿意度比較研究。長榮大學運動競技學系(所)學位論文。2017。1-76。