Title

利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統-以美濃黃蝶翠谷為案例

Translated Titles

Assessment of PPGIS by Actor-Network Theory - A Case of the PPGIS Implementation in Meinung Yellow Butterfly Valley

DOI

10.6342/NTU.2010.02172

Authors

鍾明光

Key Words

公眾參與地理資訊系統 ; 行動者網絡理論 ; 美濃黃蝶翠谷 ; 社區發展 ; Public Participation Geographic Information System ; Actor-Network Theory ; Meinung Yellow Butterfly Valley ; community development

PublicationName

臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2010年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

蔡博文

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究運用行動者網絡理論 (Actor Network Theory, ANT) 的觀點,以美濃黃蝶翠谷之公眾參與地理資訊系統 (Public Participation GIS, PPGIS) 案例為主要分析個案,建構以 ANT 為主體的 PPGIS 檢視方法,並以1992-2007年美濃社區發展的相關文獻及2007-2008年間黃蝶翠谷 PPGIS 工作坊中的群眾討論記錄為文本,檢視社區在不同階段的行動者網絡組成。本研究嘗試結合權益關係人與行動者的概念,配合政治尺度概念來建構社區發展議題中的行動者圖像,並利用:控制、技能、資金與資訊等四個向度,作為各階段的轉譯分析基礎,同時以資源提供者 (input resources)、權責行動者 (accountable Actors) 與接受方 (recipients) 等概念,用以區分不同行動者的屬性關係,釐清各階段社區行動者網絡之轉變,共獲得以下三點結論: 一、由於ANT能夠突顯PPGIS運用於社區時的網絡化特徵,對於PPGIS的進行所促成之社區賦權進行細緻的分析。 二、ANT以行動者的概念來描述與分析在社區網絡中非人單元的影響,協助研究者清楚地界定PPGIS 網絡中的行動者的角色、動能與互動關係。 三、透過分階段的行動者網絡比較,ANT清楚地描繪了PPGIS作為社區OPP角色與附帶的轉譯協商機制,及其所促成的新社區決策網絡。

English Abstract

This study employed the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to assess a Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) case in Meinung community Kaohsiung (Yellow Butterfly Valley) in Taiwan. An analytical framework of PPGIS by ANT was built. In order to assess the PPGIS project, the actors and networks of the Meinung community before the introduction of the PPGIS project were also analyzed by literature and document analysis. This study combined concepts from stakeholders and actors, and considered politlical scale to delineate the role of actors’ agency in community development. Martin’s (2000) “Network Diagram” which includes control, technology, money and information was adopted to trace the actor-network interactions. Further, this study used “input resources”, “accountable actors”, and ”recipients” to distinguish the relationships among different actors in different time periods. Using this framework and hypothesis, this study was able to analyze the change and the effects after using PPGIS in the community development issues. We can observe there are three conclusions from this study. 1. ANT is able to delineate and evaluate the social and technological interactions involved in a PPGIS implementation. 2. ANT can represent the network morphology when implement PPGIS in communities, and help researchers to clarify the roles, agency, and interactions of actors in community PPGIS decision making process. 3. The role of a PPGIS as a public consensus formation is corresponding to “obligatory passage point” in ANT.

Topic Category 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
理學院 > 地理環境資源學研究所
Reference
  1. 林文源 (2007) 論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論,科技、醫療與社會,4:65-108。
    連結:
  2. 林俊強、張長義、蔡博文、李建堂、丁志堅、李玉亭 (2005) 運用公眾參與地理資訊系統於原住民族傳統領域之研究:泰雅族司馬庫斯個案,地理學報,41:65-82。
    連結:
  3. 陳欽春 (2000) 社區主義在當代治理模式中的定位與展望,中國行政評論,10 (1):183-215。
    連結:
  4. 陳瑞麟 (2001) 社會建構中的「實在」,政治大學哲學學報,7:97-126。
    連結:
  5. 鄒萍萍 ( 2007 ) 社區營造與地方探討-以新竹市金山社區與內湖社區為例,台灣師範大學地理學系碩士班論文。
    連結:
  6. 鄭玉惠 (2000) 集體行動與地域性的再建構-以美濃反水庫運動為例,臺灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  7. 鄭踴謙 (2006) 運用參與式地理資訊系統於部落地圖繪製之研究,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  8. 蕭惠中 (2003) 一個抵抗空間的建構--馬告國家公園運動脈絡下的部落繪圖實踐,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  9. Aitken, S. C. and Michel, S. M. (1995) Who contrives the 'real' in GIS? Geographic information, planning and critical theory, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22 (1): 17-29.
    連結:
  10. Combera, A., Fishera, P. and Wadsworth, R. (2003) Actor–network theory: A suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop? Land Use Policy, 20:299-309.
    連結:
  11. AI-Kodmany, K. (2002) E-community participation: Communicating spatial planning and design using web-based maps, Socio-Economic Applications of Geographic Information Science, London: Taylor and Francis, 69-92.
    連結:
  12. Ball, J. (2002) Towards a methodology for mapping 'regions of sustainability' using PPGIS, Progress in Planning 58 (2): 81-140.
    連結:
  13. Barndt, M. (1998) Public participation GIS-barriers to implementation, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25 (2): 105-112.
    連結:
  14. Callon, M. (1986) The sociology of Actor-Network: The case of the electric vehicle. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, London: Macumillan, 19-34.
    連結:
  15. Carver, S. (2001) Public participation using web-based GIS, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 803-804.
    連結:
  16. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last, Intermediate Technology Publications, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
    連結:
  17. Cinderby, S. (1999) Geographic information systems for participation: The future of environmental GIS?, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11 (3): 304-315.
    連結:
  18. Corbett, J. and Keller, C.P. (2005) Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: Observations from two communities in Indonesia. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(2), 25-44.
    連結:
  19. Craig, W. J. and Elwood, S. A. (1998) How and why community groups use maps and geographic information, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25: 95-104.
    連結:
  20. Creighton, J. L. (1981) The public involvement manual, Abt Books, Cambridge: Mass.
    連結:
  21. Davies .R. A. (2002) Power, politics and network: Shaping partnership for sustainable communities, Area, 34 (2) :190-203.
    連結:
  22. Dunn, C. E. (2007) Participatory GIS: A people's GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31:616-637.
    連結:
  23. Elwood, S. A. (2002) GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment, Environment and Planning, 34:905-22.
    連結:
  24. Elwood, S. A. and Ghose, R. (2004) PPGIS in community development planning: farming the organizational context, Cartographica, 38:19-33.
    連結:
  25. Elwood, S. A. (2006) Participatory GIS and community planning-Restructuring technologies, social processes, and future research in PPGIS. In: Balram, S. and Dragicevic, S. (eds.) Collaborative Geographic Information Systems, London: Idea Group, 66-84.
    連結:
  26. Geertman, S. (2002) Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap, Environment and Planing B: Planning and Design, 29:21-35.
    連結:
  27. Goodchild, M. F. (2007) Citizens as sensors: Web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information, GeoFocus, 7:8-10.
    連結:
  28. Grimble, R. and Wellard, K. (1997) Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management:a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities, Agricultural System, 55 (2):173-193.
    連結:
  29. Haklay, M. and Tobon, C. (2003) Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (5):77-92.
    連結:
  30. Harris, T. and Weiner, D. (1998) Empowerment, marginalization, and community integrated GIS, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25:67-76.
    連結:
  31. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A. and Turton, I. (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems- An aid to local environmental decision-making, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24:109-125.
    連結:
  32. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981) The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constmctivist and contextual nature of science, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    連結:
  33. Kyem, P. A. K. (2004) Power, participation and inflexible institutions: An examination of the challenges to community empowerment in participatory GIS applications, Cartographica, 38 (3-4):5-17.
    連結:
  34. Latour, B. (1983) Give a laboratory and I will raise the world. Science Observed, London: Sage.
    連結:
  35. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society,劉文旋、鄭開譯,(2005),科學在行動:怎樣在社會中跟隨科學家和工程師,北京:東方出版社。
    連結:
  36. Law, J. (1986) On the methods of long distance control: Vessels, navigation and the portuguese route to India, Sociological Review Monograph, 32: 234-263.
    連結:
  37. Law, J. (1999) After ANT: topology, naming and complexity, Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell.
    連結:
  38. MacEachren, A. M. and Brewer, I. (2004) Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geocollaboration, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (1): 1-34.
    連結:
  39. Martain, E. W. (2000) Actor-networks and implementation: examples from conservation GIS in Ecuadorint, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8): 715-738.
    連結:
  40. Murduch, J. (1997) Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor-Network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society, Environment and Planning D, 15:731-756.
    連結:
  41. Murduch, J. (1998) The spaces of actor-network theory, Geoforum 29 (4):357-374.
    連結:
  42. Murduch, J. (2000) Networks-a new paradigm of rural development, Journal of Rural Studies, 16: 407-419.
    連結:
  43. Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P. and Drew, C. (2002) Datagathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16:1-22.
    連結:
  44. Nyerges, T. and Jankowski, P. (2006) Participatory geographic information science. In: Ari-Veikko, A. and Matti, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Digital Government, Idea Group Inc.
    連結:
  45. Obermeyer, N. (1998) PPGIS: The evolution of public participation GIS, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25 (2):65-66.
    連結:
  46. Poore, B. S. (2003) The open black box: The role of the end-user in GIS integration, The Canadian Geographer, 13:62-74.
    連結:
  47. Ruming, K. (2009) Following the actors: Mobilising an actor-network theory methodology in geography, Australian Geographer, 40 (4):451-469.
    連結:
  48. Sieber, R. E. (2000) Conforming (to) the opposition: The social construction of geographical information systems in social movements, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 14 (8):775-793.
    連結:
  49. Sieber, R. E. (2004) Rewiring for a GIS/2, Cartographica, 39:25-39.
    連結:
  50. Sieber, R. E. (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework, Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 96 (3):491-507.
    連結:
  51. Talen, E. (2000) Bottom-up GIS: a new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (3) : 279-294.
    連結:
  52. Walsham, G. (1997) Actor-Network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects, Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman and Hall, 466-480.
    連結:
  53. Woods, M. (1997) Researching rural conflicts: Hunting, Local Politics and Actor-networks, Journal of Rural Studies, 14 (3):321-340.
    連結:
  54. Zimmerman, M. A. and Rappaport, J. (1988) Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment, American Journal of Community Psychology 16 (5):725-750.
    連結:
  55. 參考文獻
  56. 中文文獻
  57. 王鴻濬 (2001) 環境影響評估制度中公眾參與之設計與分析,中華林學季刊,34 (1):73-84。
  58. 台灣地理資訊學會 (2007) 黃蝶翠谷生態公園規劃-以PPGIS凝聚社區共識,行政院農委會林務局補助計畫報告。
  59. 台灣地理資訊學會 (2009) 利用公眾參與式地理資訊系統協助社區林業業務推動與應用-以PPGIS 進行社區自然、人文資源永續經營之培力,行政院農委會林務局委辦研究計畫報告。
  60. 行政院文化建設委員會 (1999) 台灣社區總體營造政策發展的軌跡,台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
  61. 余新芳 (2006) 龍潭地區茶產業的行動者網絡分析,國立台灣師範大學地理學研究所碩士論文。
  62. 吳 瑩、盧雨霞、陳家建、王一鴿 (2008) 跟隨行動者重組社會-讀拉圖爾的重組社會:行動者網絡理論,社會學研究,134:1-10。
  63. 李光中、王鑫 (2004) 建立和評估自然保護區社區參與論壇之研究—以櫻花鉤吻鮭野生動物保護區為例,地理學報,36:1-22。
  64. 李仲彬 (2006) 公共參與式地理資訊系統之初探性研究:我國地方政府GIS 網站評估,行政暨政策學報,43:81-126
  65. 李承嘉 (2005) 行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究—以九份聚落1895~1945年發展為例,地理學報,39:1-30。
  66. 李謁政 (2006) 臺灣遭遇現代性的後果與社區總體營造的創造性修補,環境與藝術期刊,4:1-15。
  67. 何明修 (2006) 綠色民主:台灣環境運動的研究,台北:群學出版社。
  68. 岳書敬、楊玉明 (2005) 公眾參與對中央政府和地方政府間委托代理關係的影響,軟科學,19 (4):45-47。
  69. 林玲伃 (2005) 參與式網絡繪圖地理資訊系統建構之研究—以校園交通規劃為例,逢甲大學土地管理所碩士論文。
  70. 林德福、呂秉怡 (2005) 公寓大廈推動社區營造的經驗與機制初探,國際會議系列行動國際社區規劃論壇,台北:台北市政府都市發展局。
  71. 洪文彥 (2004) 行動者網絡理論應用於邊陲地區 (鄉村) 發展之研究—以澎湖地區發展為例,國立台北大學地政學研究所碩士論文。
  72. 洪馨蘭 (1999) 菸草美濃:美濃地區客家文化與菸作經濟,清華人類學叢刊,台北:唐山出版社。
  73. 美濃愛鄉文教基金會 (2006) 美濃文化造鎮總體規劃案期末報告,高雄:高雄縣政府。
  74. 美濃愛鄉協進會 (1996) 美濃產業歷史與空間演變-試論美濃社區總體營造,高縣文獻,15:107-123。
  75. 張長義、蔡博文、范毅軍、盧道杰、丁志堅、台邦•撒沙勒 (2002、2003、2004、2005、2007) 原住民族傳統領域調查-第1-5年研究報告書,台北:行政院原住民族委員會。
  76. 孫柏瑛 (2004) 當代地方治理-面向21世紀的挑戰,北京:中國人民大學出版社。
  77. 郭明哲 (2008) 行動者網絡理論ANT-布魯諾•拉圖爾科學哲學研究,復旦大學哲學學院博士論文。
  78. 郭俊立 (2007) 巴黎學派的行動者網絡理論及其哲學意蘊評析,自然辯證法研究,23 (2):104-108。
  79. 陳又琦 (2005) 都市廟宇文化空間之行動者網絡分析-以新莊地藏庵為例,國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
  80. 陳郁秀 (2001) 迎接社區總體營造新紀元:創造文化生活新故鄉,社區總體營造年會成果彙編,台北:行政院文化建設委員會會。
  81. 盛曉明 (2005) 巴黎學派與實驗室研究,自然辯證法通訊,157:64-70。
  82. 許馨文 (2004) 音樂聆聽經驗的意義建構-以十二個大學生聽、說歌曲〈菊夜行軍〉為例,國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。
  83. 賀建芹 (2003) 打開潘朵拉的盒子-拉圖爾對科學知識的人類學研究,山東科技大學學報,5 (4):10-13。
  84. 楊弘任 (2009) 社區在行動:從批判者到轉譯者,社會運動的年代學術研討會,高雄:國立中山大學。
  85. 裘 涵 (2009) 新媒體技術的標準化戰略:基於行動者網絡理論,中國廣播電視學刊,3:17-18。
  86. 廖桂敏 (2004) 地方文化產業發展之實踐-以美濃鎮為例,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文
  87. 廖俊松 (2004) 社區營造與社區參與:金鈴園與邵社的觀察與學習,社區發展,107:133-145。
  88. 劉濟亮 (2006) 拉圖爾行動者網絡理論研究,哈爾濱工業大學哲學研究所碩士論文。
  89. 鄭錫楷 (1999) BOT統理模式的研究,全國公共行政博碩士論文研討會,台北:中國行政學會。
  90. 蔡博文、張長義、丁志堅、林俊強 (2004) 參與式地理資訊系統於原住民傳統領域知識建構,第二屆數位地球國際研討會,台北:文化大學。
  91. 盧道杰 (2007) 社區林業與公眾參與式地理資訊系統的合作與展望,社區林業計畫-地理資訊系統應用教育訓練班講義,台北:行政院農委會林務局。
  92. 謝周佩 (2001) 兩種文化與行動者網絡理論,浙江社會科學,2:106-110。
  93. 謝祿宜 (2002) 追求一個公民社會的理想國—美濃愛鄉協進會的過去、現在與未來,民主政治與社會福利學術研討會,嘉義:國立中正大學。
  94. 鍾永豐 (1996) 南台灣綠色革命,高市綠色協會,台中:晨星出版社。
  95. 鍾怡婷 (2003) 美濃反水庫運動與公共政策互動之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
  96. 魏屹東 (2002) 科學社會學方法論:走向社會語境化,科學研究,20 (2):127-132
  97. 英文文獻
  98. Abbot, J., Chambers, R., Dunn, C., Harris, T., Merode, E., Porter, G., Townsend, J. and Weiner, D. (1998) Participatory GIS: Opportunity or oxymoron? Participatory Learning and Action Notes, 33:27-34.
  99. AI-Kodmany, K. (2001) Bridging the gap between technical and local knowledge: Tools for promoting community-based planning and design, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 18 (2): 110-130.
  100. Barndt, M. (2002) A model for evaluating public participation GIS. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 346-356.
  101. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1997) Participation in conservation: Why, what, when, how? Beyond Fences-Seeking social sustainability in conservation, Switzerland: IUCN, l (2):26-31.
  102. Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1992) Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to collins and yearley, Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 343-368.
  103. Carver, S. (2003) The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st century, Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA), 15: 61-71.
  104. Cohen, M. L. (1976). House United, House Divided, Columbia University Press.
  105. Convis, C., (2001) Conservation geography: Case studiesin GIS, computer mapping, and activism, History of the Society for Conservation GIS, CA: ESRI Press.
  106. Drew, C. H. (2003) Transparency – Considerations for PPGIS research and development, Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) , 15:73-78.
  107. Elwood, S. A. (2002) The impacts of GIS use for neighbourhood revitalization in Minneapolis. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 77-88.
  108. Fox, J. (2005) Mapping power: Ironic effects of spatial information technology in mapping communities, ethics values practice, Honolulu: East-West Center.
  109. Harvey, F. (2001) Constructing GIS: Actor-Networks of collaboration, Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 13 (1): 29-38.
  110. Harris, T. and Weiner, D. (1996) GIS and society:the social implications of how people, space, and environment are represented in GIS, Scientific Report for the Initiative Specialist Meeting, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Report, 96-97.
  111. Harris, T. and Weiner, D. (2002) Implementing a community-integrated GIS: Perspectives from South African fieldwork. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 246-258.
  112. Harvey, F. (2001) Constructing GIS: Actor Networks of Collaboration, Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) , 13: 29-37.
  113. Jordan, G. H. (1998) A systems based framework for the evaluation of a geographic information system for community forest resource assessment, Presented at GIS and Society Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
  114. Jordan, G. (2002) GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 232-245.
  115. Laituri, M. (2002) Ensuring access to GIS for marginal societies. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 270-82.
  116. Latour, B. (1988) Irreductions: Part two of the pasteurization of France, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  117. Law, J. (2002) Objects and spaces, Theory, Culture and Society, 19:91-105.
  118. Law, J. (2004) After method, London and New York: Routledge.
  119. Pickles, J. (1999) Arguments, debates and dialogues: The GIS social theory debate and the concern for alternatives, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley.
  120. Poole, P. (1995) Indigenous peoples, mapping and biodiversity conservation: An analysis of current activities and opportunities for applying geomatics technologies, Biodiversity Support Program Discussion Paper Series, Washington, DC: WWF.
  121. Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M. and Fox, J. (2006) Practical ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers, Participatory Learning and Action Notes, 54:106-13.
  122. Rambaldi, G. and Callosa-Tarr, J. (2002) Participatory 3-dimensional modelling: Guiding principals and applications, ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Philippines: Los Baños.
  123. Schlossberg, M. and Mathew, M. (2003) When GIS was rejected: implications for collaborative planning and public participation GIS (PPGIS) available, Planning, Public Policy and Management, Oregon: University of Oregon.
  124. Schlossberg, M. A. and Shuford, E. (2005) Delineating 'public' and 'participation' in PPGIS, Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) , 16 (2) :15-26.
  125. Sheppare, E. Couclelis, H. Graham, S, Harrington, J.W. and Onsrud, H. (1999) Geographies of the information society, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (8):797-823.
  126. Sieber, R. E. (2002) Geographic information systems in the environmental movement. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 153-72.
  127. Tulloch, D. L. (2002) Environmental NGOs and community access to technology as a force for change. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 192-204.
  128. Tulloch, D. L. and Shapiro, T. (2003) The intersection of data access and public participation: impacting GIS users’ success? Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA), 15 (2):55-60.
  129. Walker, D. H. Leitch, A. M., de Lai, R., Cottrell, A., Johnson, A. K. L. and Pullar, D. (2002) A ommunity-based and collaborative GIS joint venture in rural Australia. In: Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 137-52.
  130. Wright, P. J. (2004) Olympic gold: Using GISC to facilitate public participation in the olympic planning process, GIS Research UK (GISRUK), 111-114.
  131. 網路資料
  132. 中華民國社區營造學會 (2006) 非營利組織與社區營造專題報導編輯前言,社區營造學會電子報,71: http://www.cesroc.org.tw/eNEWS/index71.htm。
  133. 洪馨蘭 (2008) 文化節慶-美濃黃蝶祭簡介:http://www.ncafroc.org.tw/abc/festival-content.asp?ser_no=172
  134. 教育部人文社會科學網 (2007) 科技與社會辦公室計畫簡介:
  135. http://hss.edu.tw/plan_detail.php?class_plan=167
  136. 陳錦煌 (2005) 社造十年-反省與再出發,中華民國社區營造學會電子報,53: http://www.cesroc.org.tw/eNEWS/index53.htm。
  137. 廖炫銘(2006)參與式地理資訊系統之趨勢與發展,http://guava.iis.sinica.edu.tw/_media/events/open_gis_internet_gis_2006_conference/ppgis.pdf
Times Cited
  1. 林書楷(2013)。PPGIS促進溝通之成效-美濃國家自然公園案例分析。臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文。2013。1-115。 
  2. 彭安琪(2011)。宜蘭縣無尾港水鳥保護區社區監測的施行與研究。臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所學位論文。2011。1-93。 
  3. 芮光曄(2016)。「現實」與「理想」之間:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究發展基金會宜蘭工作室的參與式規劃設計實踐。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文。2016。1-139。