論違憲審查與政治民主化的辯證－以「特別權力關係」於我國司法實務之變遷為例

何陸垣

doi:10.6342/NTU.2015.01390

44.192.254.173，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link 「 https://doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: https://doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing a document with a DOI, the DOI permanent URL should always be presented (if using APA or Chicago format, present https://doi.org/DOI number). If using a citation format that does not specify DOI, the DOI permanent URL should still be presented as a priority.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Social Sciences > Graduate Institute of National Development
Social Sciences > Politics

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Purchase Single Articles

Download PDF

論違憲審查與政治民主化的辯證－以「特別權力關係」於我國司法實務之變遷為例

The Dialectic Between Judicial Review and Political Democratization─A Case Study on the Transition of “besonderes Gewaltverhältnis”(Special Rule of the State Over Specific Citizens) Recognized by the Practice of Law in Taiwan.

何陸垣 , Masters　　Advisor：葛祥林　　

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU.2015.01390

司法違憲審查；政治民主化；特別權力關係；辯證；憲法變遷； Judicial Review ； Democratization ； Das besonderes Gewaltverhältnis ； Dialectic ； Constitutional Transition

Abstract │ Reference (68) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

This thesis focuses on the democratization-judicial review interaction in Taiwan. On account of the surveying instrument for democratization process and rule of law in practice is human right protection, the main research subject in my thesis is the transition of “ besonderes Gewaltverhältnis”, which signifies the special rule of the state over specific citizens, upon decisions of the judicial organs in Taiwan such as Grand Justices and Administrative Courts.
    In every single process of democratization, which is upon definitions in this thesis, the features of objective constitutional order that are marked by the transition of “ besonderes Gewaltverhältnis” are compared and taken as a tool for interpreting how the democratization-judicial review interaction in Taiwan is.  
    Upon research methods in Jurisprudence such as legal literature review, comparative law and interpretation in legal reasoning, this thesis make the main argument from some perspectives as follows: theory of constitutional transition, citizens’ control over the state by law, and Hegelian dialectics of legal philosophy. 
    The main argument in this thesis is as follows: as time goes by, what the constitution says, which has been recognized by judicial review of the state, must be inconsistent with how it works, which is influenced and urged by the democratization of the state. In other words, as what the constitution says is regarded as a thesis of Hegelian dialectic stages, how it works as an antithesis to challenge the thesis, and both conflicted as a new specific constitutional controversy. When a new decision to resolve the controversy is made by judicial review, it could be regarded as the synthesis of former dialectic stages and the thesis of next ones at the same time. Such Hegelian dialectic formula, thesis-antithesis-synthesis, could be a powerful model of the democratization-judicial review interaction in Taiwan.
    This thesis has some findings as follows: 1. Upon the theory of constitutional transition and the one of citizens’ control over the state by law, that the Hegelian dialectic formula being powerful model of the democratization-judicial review interaction in Taiwan is possible in theory. 2. It is applicable to take the moments of R.O.C Constitution amended in history as the milestone to mark democratization processes of Taiwan. 3. The Judicial Yuan interpretations referring to “ besonderes 
Gewaltverhältnis” embody features of the Hegelian dialectic formula, which are consistent with the main argument in this thesis. 4. In Taiwan, upon some cases of law-amending and the ones of judicial decision-making, the Hegelian dialectic formula is the model of democratization-judicial review interaction, and this model could deconstruct “ besonderes Gewaltverhältnis” .

Reference ( 68 ) 〈TOP〉

黃俊傑（2007）。《東亞儒學：經典與詮釋的辯證》。台北：台灣大學。
連結：
翁岳生（1994）。〈大法官功能演變之探討〉，收於氏著《法治國家之行政法與司法》，頁411-445。台北：元照。
連結：
葉俊榮(2003)。〈九七憲改與台灣憲法變遷的模式〉，收於氏著：《民主轉型與憲法變遷》，頁111-156。台北：元照。
連結：
黃舒芃（2009）。〈多元民主中的自由保障：Hans Kelsen的多元主義民主觀暨其對議會與憲法法院的證立〉，收錄於氏著《民主國家的憲法及其守護者》，頁55-97。台北：元照。
連結：
黃舒芃（2009）。〈德國法上違憲審查權限爭議的歷史軌跡：從H. Kelsen與C Schmitt的辯論談起〉，收錄於氏著《民主國家的憲法及其守護者》，頁141-178。台北：元照。
連結：

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：

About Airiti│ Authorize Airiti │ About Airiti Library │ Recruitment │ Copyright Notice │ Privacy Notice │ Click Here to Download

Customer Service Line: 0800-000-747 FAX 02-2926-6016 Mail to Us ： lib@airiti.com Business Hours: Mon. - Fri. 9:00~18:00 18F, No.80, Sec.1, Chenggong Rd., Yonghe Dist, New Taipei City 234, Taiwan