透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.130.218
  • 學位論文

都市遊憩資源調查與遊程設計之研究-以屏東市為例

A Study of City Recreation Resources Investigation and Itinerary Design for Pingtung city

指導教授 : 劉照金

摘要


本研究主要目的為瞭解目前屏東市地區的遊憩資源之發展程度與遊憩資源,並期望為屏東市規劃出不同遊憩資源組合的遊憩路線。本研究方法分問卷調查與深度訪談兩部分,問卷調查則參考相關文獻與研究,編製成「景觀美質、遊憩吸引力評分表」與「旅遊需求與目的問題選項」為工具,以屏東市居民與旅客為對象,共發出500份問卷,回收有效問卷485份;深度訪談則選擇屏東市現任的民意代表為對象,以瞭解屏東市目前遊憩資源開發現況與願景。所得資料經過分析,獲得結果如下:(一)屏東市的觀光遊憩資源依其特性歸納為歷史古蹟、特色美食、藝術人文、及景觀名勝等四大類;(二)透過景觀美質評估分析,受訪者對於景觀美質的偏好,會隨著遊憩資源的所在位置與內容豐富程度而有所差異;(三)由時空路徑分析得知,一個景點的形成,除了深受人們遊憩活動需求之外,還要去考慮到人們時間上的限制與遊憩設施所提供的服務;(四)屏東市目前各項遊憩資源尚未整治完成,宜由政府為基準的平台,結合各族群之文化,發展屬於屏東特色的慢活遊憩行為;(五)屏東市依照現有四大類型遊憩資源,依照資源性質可劃分為同質性、綜合性遊憩資源,依照遊憩時間可劃分為都市型、鄉村型等23條遊憩路線。本研究結論為:屏東市最具吸引力的遊憩資源為特色美食,而景點之間的美質評分差異中,以藝術人文的遊憩資源為冠,在加以屏東市區裡的廟宇與商圈為遊客與居民的主要遊憩景點,但是在各個遊憩資源之間並無有效的整體規劃與整合的動作,是故本研究將結合屏東市中各項遊憩資源,並依照其特色加以規畫出屬於屏東市特有的遊憩路線。

並列摘要


The purpose of the study is to investigate the developed level of the recreation resources and the present recreation resources of Pingtung City, and expect to map out the recreation itinerary which is composed by different recreation resources for Pingtung City. The method of the study separate into two parts: questionnaires investigation and depth interview. The questionnaires investigation takes other related literatures and researches to compile two charts: landscape beauty and recreation attraction scoring scale and traveling demand question. Take this two as material and the residents and visitors of Pingtung City, send 500 questionnaires out and retrieve 485 valid questionnaires. The depth interview chooses the present elected representative to investigate the present situation of developed recreation resources and prospect. Analyzing the information, the results are as follows:(1)The tourism recreation resources separate into four parts, include historic spot, featured delicacies, arts and landscape beauty. (2)Through the estimated analysis of landscape beauty, the interviewee’s interest of the landscape beauty will be different by the location of the recreation resources and the plentiful level of the contents. (3) From the analysis of time-space path, the researcher could know that to form one spot should not only consider people’s demand of the recreation activities, and also should consider people’s time limitation and the service of the recreation facilities. (4) Each recreation resources of Pingtung City hasn’t integrated yet. It should rely on the government to combine the culture of different race, and develop the slowness recreation behavior which contains Pingtung’s characteristic. (5) According to the quality of the resources, the recreation resources of Pingtung City can separate into the same property and comprehensive resources. According to the recreation time, it can separate into 23 recreation itineraries, include City Type and Country Type. The conclusion of this study is that the most attractive resource is featured delicacies. The art recreation resources got a champion of the landscape beauty scoring scale. Temple and shopping district is the main recreation spot in Pingtung City, but there is no valid entire plan and integrated movement. So, the research will combine each recreation resources of Pingtung City, and map out the particular recreation itinerary of Pingtung City.

參考文獻


王明元、林倩綺、許浴蒼(2008)。鹿港地區居民對城市觀光衝擊認知與態度之研究。管理實務與理論研究,2,228-247。
江昱仁、方婕、蔡進士(2008)。都市河岸遊客動機、觀光意象與滿意度 之研究。運動與遊憩研究,3,52-78。
李銘輝、曹勝雄、張德儀(1995)。遊憩據點條件對遊憩需求之研究。觀光研究學報,1(1),25-39。
李台京(2007)。新竹市城市觀光的創新及發展。中華行政學報,4,7-22。
李樑堅、施美惠、康桓甄(2008)。高雄市民對於夜間旅遊觀光遊憩資源認知與觀光行銷策略之研究。運動與遊憩研究,3(2),198-224。

被引用紀錄


温承容(2016)。與陌生人同行旅遊之價值研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1108201714020303

延伸閱讀