本文針對意大利建築史家曼菲德•塔夫利用威尼其學派所提出之批判的歷史計劃之理論取向提出一個認識論批判。首先,作者將塔夫利及威尼期學派之形成與轉變放回義大利與戰後歐洲的社會脈絡中做一回顧。然後,就批判歷史之論述本身,將其對空間形式與脈絡組織,應用等三方面的觀點加以闡述。最後,提一個認識論批判爲總結,由(1)空間的特殊性,(2)論述,空間形式與衝突的社會經濟變動等兩層次,分析塔夫利之歷史計劃之理論性質與限制。
This essay is an epistemological critique of the approach of the critical history formulated by Italian architectural historian Manfredo Tafuri and the school of Venice First, the evolution of Tafuri's ”critical project” and the school of Venice are reviewed in the social historical context of the post war Europe and Italy Then, the author tries to elaborate upon the substance of Tafuri's theoretical discourse in three different aspects to see how Tafuri deals with these issues the spatial form, the form-context relationship, and the application Finally to conclude this epistemological review, a discus in of the theoretical characters and the limitation of Tafuri's historical project concentrate on two aspects 1 The specificity of space, 2 The discourse, spatial form, and conflictive social economic dynamics.