本研究旨在瞭解國立臺灣師範大學四年級學生生活壓力、因應方式、社會支持與其身心健康及其相關因素,以作為相關單位有效協助學生之參考。採橫斷式調查,以九十一學年度國立臺灣師範大學四年級學生1849人為母群,經系統抽樣法抽取樣本,施測後得有效樣本387人,回收率92.6%。並得到以下重要結果: 一研究對象身心健康狀況佳;在過去六個月內感到困擾的生活壓力中,以前途壓力為最大,其次是教學實習壓力和學校壓力;在面對壓力時主要以「問題/積極方式」來因應;而獲得的社會支持以訊息性支持為多,其社會支持的主要來源為家人。 二、在面臨的生活壓力愈大時,研究對象愈常採用負向的消極因應方式,其身心健康狀況也愈差;在面臨的生活壓力愈小時,研究對象愈常採用正向的積極因應方式,其所獲得的情緒性支持與訊息性社會支持也愈多,身心健康狀況也愈好。 三、研究對象的社會人口學變項中「家庭結構」、「修習教育學分」兩項與生活壓力有關;「學系類組」、「性別」及「身份別」等三項與因應方式有關;「學系類組」、「性別」兩項與社會支持有關。而其身心健康的最主要預測變項是「主觀生活壓力」和「入學方式」,其中以「主觀生活壓力」最具解釋力。
The purpose of the study was to explore the pressure faced by senior of National Taiwan Normal University, methods they applied to cope with pressure, social support and related factors influencing mental and physical health. The results were to provide assistance toward students in health. In the cross-section study, 1849 senior students in National Taiwan Normal University was the sampling frame. With system sampling, there were 387 effective samples with 92.6% response rate. The results were as followed: 1. The most research subjects were in good health. In the past six month, the main stress that bothered them include worry about the future, stress about practical training, and stress from school. Most of the subjects solved the problem with aggressive attitude. They received social support mainly informational. The support were mainly from families. 2. With the stress getting serious, subjects would tend to apply passive methods and have worse health condition. With the stress was not so serious, subjects would become more active and apply positive method and have better health. Meanwhile, they would get emotional support and informational social support. 3. The demographic variances such as “family structure” and “educational credit” were related to stress. “Department”, “Gender” and “status” were related to the method applied to solve stress. “Department” and “Gender” were related to social support. The variances influencing mental and physical health of subjects were “subjective stress” and “schooling”. Of these, “subjective stress” had the most predictive power.