論公共工程之保固條款

A Study on the Defects Clause of Public Construction Contract

張鈞翔(Chun-Hsian Chung)

《真理財經法學》 8期 (2012/03) Pp. 147-193

摘要

現行法上未見保固之定義，故而關於其法律效果爭議不斷，大致上可分成「瑕疵擔保」責任與「獨立」保固責任兩種立場，本文以此作為類型化的基礎，加以探討。關於獨立保固責任是否存在？本文提出兩項標準：一、是否違反強制規定；二、是否創設瑕疵擔保所無之事項？逐一就保固與瑕疵擔保之各面相，比較分析與歸納法律效果適用之爭議，希望釐清實務上個案適用的紊亂。

關鍵字

保固條款 ； 保固期 ； 保固保證金 ； 政府工程採購 ； 瑕疵擔保責任 ； 獨立保固責任 ； 國際顧問工程師協會

並列摘要

In the current regulations of Law, we see the term of ＂Defects clause＂, but can not find that the definition of it. This makes the courts and scholars dispute what is the right of＂Defects clause＂and what is the effect of it. To Sum up the types of ＂Defects clause＂ on the theory, we will find that the disputes should be distinguished from 'defects liability' and ' independence liability'. This study regards this as the types foundation to start discussing. For the purpose of examing independent-liability existence, this study proposes two standards to analyze as follow: First, whether the Defects clause violate the regulation of Law? Second, whether the Defects clause create new obligations beyond civil law? After comparing and analyzing every difference of defects-liability and independence-liability types one by one, this study will sum up all the results. Expecting the results of this study would be helpful to distinguish disputes between defects-liability and independence-liability on theory.

並列關鍵字

Defects clause ； The period of defects notification ； Bond ； Construction contract in government procurement ； Defects liability ； Independence liability ； FIDIC