透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.93.126
  • 期刊

環境目標結構與控制-價值信念對學業情緒之效果

The Effects of Environmental Goal Structures and Control-Value Beliefs on Academic Emotions

摘要


情緒對於學習十分重要,但相較於認知與動機,學業情緒仍未被廣泛探討。基於此,本研究目的如下:(1)考驗本研究所建構的「正/負向情緒控制-價值模式」是否受到觀察資料的支持;(2)分析環境目標結構對控制-價值信念的效果,及其透過控制-價值信念對學業情緒之間接效果;(3)驗證期望-價值理論主張之價值對於動機歷程影響較期望為大之論點。為完成上述研究目的,本研究抽取台灣地區635名國中生,接受「學業情緒量表」、「環境目標結構量表」與「控制-價值信念量表」的測量。所蒐集資料以結構方程模式、模式比較法進行分析。研究結果顯示:(1)正/負向情緒控制-價值模式具有理想的整體適配度與內在品質,適合用來解釋國中生的資料。(2)環境目標結構對控制-價值信念具有直接效果,並透過控制-價值信念對學業情緒產生開發效果。(3)工作價值對正向情緒的效果要比自我效能對正向情緒的效果大;兩者對負向情緒的效果則無不同。本研究根據研究結果在理論及實務上的涵義進行討論,並提出未來研究之建議。

並列摘要


The impact of emotions on learning is an important topic. Yet, compared to cognition and motivation constructs, academic emotion has not been widely explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to: (a) test the fit between empirically observed data and the control-value model of positive/negative emotions proposed by the authors; (b) analyze the effects of environmental goal structures on control-value beliefs and the indirect effects on academic emotions through control-value beliefs; and (c) confirm the proposition that value constructs has greater effect on motivational process than expectancy constructs of the expectancy-value theory. Participants were 635 junior high school students. The instruments used in this study included the Academic Emotion Scale, the Environmental Goal Structure Scale, and the Control-value Belief Scale Observed data were analyzed by SEM and model comparison approach. Results of this study were as follows: (a) There is adequate fit between the observed data and the theoretical models; (b) The environmental goal structures have direct effects on control-value beliefs, and have indirect effects on achievement emotions through control-value beliefs; (c) Task value has greater effect on positive emotions than self-efficacy; however, both of them have no difference in effects on negative emotions. Implications for theory, instructional intervention and future research are discussed.

參考文獻


林宴瑛(2006)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之關係及潛在改變量分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所。
程炳林、林清山(2002)。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報。34(1),43-60。
(Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International).
Ames, C.(1992).Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology.84(3),261-271.
Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Journal of Educational Psychology.80(3),260-267.

被引用紀錄


陳穎文(2015)。合作策略閱讀教學對離島國中生閱讀西洋少年小說能力與態度效益研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00081
林宴瑛(2022)。國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析教育心理學報53(4),923-947。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0007
劉玉玲(2021)。運用MSE模式於國中數學補救教學之合作式行動研究教育心理學報53(2),407-435。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0007
黃筠婷、程炳林(2021)。國中生學業情緒、情境興趣及學習涉入的交互關係教育心理學報52(3),571-593。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202103_52(3).0004
劉玉玲、沈淑芬(2015)。數學自我概念、數學學習策略、數學學業情緒與數學學業成就之研究-自我提升模式觀點教育心理學報46(4),491-516。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20140716

延伸閱讀