論胡宏從誠仁心性道物說的儒學建構

本文討論胡宏的道器思想，首先說明胡宏哲學中的道器思想的表述方式，其次評價當代胡宏學的研究成果，指出大陸學者的概念範疇研究法及牟宗三先生的「以心著性」之圓教詮釋模型的缺失，前者在於不能釐清系統的區別，後者在於詮釋上的過度強勢，因此本文採取哲學基本問題研究法，針對胡宏在誠仁、心性、道物概念的討論，進行哲學基本問題的命題分析。文中先談胡宏由誠與仁說的本體論及工夫論，再談由心性概念及道物概念說的存有論、本體論及工夫論。總體說來，胡宏學在本體論及工夫論上準確繼承、官說有理，但缺乏創造性。至於存有論上的討論，雖有涉及，卻不深入，且不形成系統，因此導致朱熹的批評。

關鍵字

胡宏；心性；道物；理氣；性形；性本論；存有論

並列摘要

On Hu Hong' doctrine of Tao/Qi (器), this paper first explains how the thought about Tao/Qi (器) is expressed in Hu Hong's philosophy; secondly, we evaluate the cotemporary scholarship on Hu Hong, pointing out the defect of Mainland Chinese scholars' categorical approach along with the problem with Mou Tzung-san's interpretative model of perfect teaching-to manifest human nature through the cultivation of mind. The defect of those Mainland Chinese scholars is that they can't clarify the systematic differences, while Mou's problem is that he was too dominant in his interpretation. Therefore, this paper takes the methodology of fundamental philosophical questions and makes a propositional analysis of the fundamental philosophical questions of Hu Hong's concepts about cheng/ren, shin/shing and tao/wu. In this paper, we first talk about the theory of value and theory of practice of Hu Hong's doctrine of sincerity and kindness; and then we will discuss the theory of being, theory of value and theory of practice of Hu's doctrines of shin/shing and tao/wu. By and large, Hu Hong was precise and logical rather than creative in his theory of value and theory of practice. As for his theory of being, it's neither profound nor systematic, which in turn provoked Ju Xi's criticism.

並列關鍵字

Hu Hong ； Shin/Shing ； Tao/Wu ； Li/Qi 器； Nature/Form ； Main ； Tenet of Nature ； Theory of Being

國際替代計量

論胡宏從誠仁心性道物說的儒學建構

全文下載

主題瀏覽