透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.70.132
  • 期刊

問卷調查題型設計的效應檢證:以「政治知識」測量的隨機實驗為例

Effects of Survey Questionnaire Design: A Random Experiment in Measuring Political Knowledge as an Example

摘要


問卷調查係為了探詢受訪者對特定議題之意見、態度或行為,不但受訪者本身所擁有的相關訊息多寡可能影響其回答意願,題目與選項的設計型態也會左右受訪者的回答模式。有鑑於實務上大多數的問卷調查常囿於調查成本與問卷長度的考量,無法針對同一概念採取多元的題型設計,以確認受訪者在不同題型設計下的回答模式。因此,本研究乃採取實驗設計方式,以台灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)的政治知識測量題組為例,依據:(1)「開放VS.封閉」的題型設計,(2)是否提供「無反應」選項,設計成四種不同版本的問卷題目。以大學生為施測對象,採取「後測控制組設計」(posttest-only control-group design),將不同問卷版本依實驗設計原理,隨機發放給學生填答,共計回收1,110份有效問卷。本研究結果有幾個發現:(1)題型和無反應選項的設計的確會影響到受訪者的回答模式,封閉型的題目設計有助於增加受訪者的答對比例,同樣也會產生高於開放型題目的答錯率;(2)開放型的題目設計,因無選項可供參考,也會降低受訪者的回答意願,因而有較高的無反應比例;(3)藉由題型和無反應選項的組合設計,可以較為精確地估計Mondak(1999)所建構之受訪者類型,但各類型的比例組合會因政治知識測量題目的難易而產生較大的變動。

並列摘要


A survey is designed to explore the participants' opinions, attitudes and actions towards certain topics. The amount of information possessed by participants is not the only factor that influences their willingness to participate; question types and options design also influence participants' responses. In reality, given cost constraints and questionnaire length, it is not feasible to provide a multiple survey design for a single concept, or to verify participants' response mode under different survey designs. This study used an experimental design to measure political knowledge from Taiwan's Election and Democratization Study (TEDS) as an example, based on (1) an "open-ended vs. close-ended" question design; (2) whether it provides "non-response" as an option, to design four different types of surveys. The study uses a posttest-only control group design with university students as participants. We randomly released the questionnaires to participants and had 1,110 valid questionnaires. The study found that question type and non-response design affects the participant response mode; a close-ended questionnaire design does increase the correct response ratio from participants, but it also produces a higher proportion of incorrect answers than an open-ended questionnaire. An openended questionnaire design does not have options as reference, and so it could lower the willingness of participants to take part in the survey, and it therefore resulted in a higher non-response ratio. From the composite design of question type and non-response option, we were able to precisely estimate types of participants as in Mondak (1999), but the combinations of different types of participants vary significantly as results from the level of difficulties in a questionnaire designed to measure political knowledge.

參考文獻


Prior, Markus. 2014. “Visual Political Knowledge: A Different Road to Competence?” The Journal of Politics 76(1): 41-57. doi:10.1017/S0022381613001096
王宏忠,2012,〈政治意識及政治菁英的論述對於台灣民眾議題立場的影響:對Zaller 之主流效應及極化效應之檢證〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,9(2): 71-123。(Wang Hung-chung. 2012. “Zheng zhi yi shi ji zheng zhi jing ying de lun shu dui yu tai wan min zhong yi ti li chang de ying xiang: Dui Zallerzhi zhu liu xiao ying ji ji hua xiao ying zhi jian zheng” [The Impact of Political Awareness and Elite’s Discourse on Taiwanese’s Issue Positions: A Simple Test of Zaller’s Mainstream Effect and Polarized Effect]. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 9(2): 71-123.)
邱皓政,2011,《量化研究法(三):測驗原理與量表發展技術》(初版),台北:雙葉書廊。(Qiu, Hao-zheng. 2011. Liang hua yan jiu fa (san): Ce yan yuan li yu liang biao fa zhan ji shu [Quantitative Research Methods III: Principles and Techniques of Testing and Index Development]. Taipei: yehyeh.)
張鐙文、莊文忠,2012,〈數位時代媒介使用行為與政治知識成因之析探:網路與非網路使用族群之比較分析〉,《競爭力評論》,15: 65-90。(Chang, Teng-wen, and Wen-jong Juang. 2012. “Shu wei shi dai mei jie shi yong hang wei yu zheng zhi zhi shi cheng yin zhi xi tan: Wang lu yu fei wang lu shi yong zu qun zhi bi jiao fen xi” [Exploring the Relationship between Media Use and Political Knowledge in the Digital Era: A Comparative Analysis among Internet and Non-Internet Users]. Competitiveness Review 15: 65-90.)
莊文忠,2009,《績效管理與衡量:指標設計的議題與實務》(初版),台北:智勝。(Juang, Wen-jong. 2009. Ji xiao guan li yu heng liang: Zhi biao she ji de yi ti yu shi wu [Performance Management and Measurement: The Issues and Practices of Indicator Design]. Taipei: Best Wise.)

延伸閱讀