摘要
1942年冬天，佔領南京的日軍在南京發掘出玄奘遺骨（頂骨）。對此，汪精衛政權為提高其政權威望，展示「中日友好」，不但與日軍共同修建了南京玄奘塔，還舉行奉移法會，將遺骨中的一部份分給北京（當時、北平）。不僅如此，汪政權還將一部份玄奘遺骨分給了日本。過去，關於玄奘遺骨的發現及分骨問題，在中國、日本及台灣之間存在幾種不同的言論或說法。比如，日軍是否掠奪玄奘遺骨？玄奘遺骨如何達到日本？中國即便勝利，也陷入內戰混亂，遺骨到底被分成幾份，分散保存在何處？原來玄奘遺骨是否真的？等等。本文是以筆者在大量搜集日本、中國大陸以及台灣的外交檔案、報紙、資料為基礎，論述在南京發現的玄奘遺骨及其狀況、之後的分骨經過。
並列摘要
In the winter of 1942, troops of The Central China Expeditionary Army (Nanking Arsenal, Lieutenant Colonel Takamori) discovered Xuanzang's bone relics. The Japanese Army returned the relics to their Chinese allies in order to foster ＂Sino-Japanese Friendship＂, and the Wang Jingwei government ceremoniously rebuilt Xuanzang's Pagoda in 1944. Further, some fragments of Xuanzang's bone relics were transferred from Nanjing to Beijing and Tianjin by Chinese Buddhists. After the war, different questions regarding the discovery and distribution of Xuanzang's relics emerged in China, Japan, and Taiwan. For example, did the Japanese army steal Xuanzang's relics? How did Xuanzang's relics come to Japan? How many temples were in the possession of relic fragments? Are the relics real? Using diplomatic communications, newspapers, journals, and other historical materials collected in China, Japan, and Taiwan, this paper reexamines the circumstances of the wartime discovery and distribution of Xuanzang's bone relics.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 楊維中（2013）。玄奘大師早期行曆若干問題考述。玄奘佛學研究，(19)，25-51。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18133649-201303-201304240018-201304240018-25-51
- 釋昭慧（2007）。「詳考其理， 各擅宗塗」－玄奘西行求法的原委。弘誓雙月刊，(86)，34-44。https://doi.org/10.29665/HS.200704.0007
- 曾達輝（1997）。重探《准南子》的流衍史－評羅斯著《淮南子的版本史》。書目季刊，31(2)，65-77。https://doi.org/10.6203/BQ.1997.9.31.2.05
- 彭蔚然（2016）。A Study of Fu Zeng-Xiang's Establishment in Ancient Bibliography〔碩士論文，國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1303201714241105
- 徐如君（2006）。Research On Nie Rongzhen And The Development Of China’s Atomic Bombs And Missiles （1955～1966）〔碩士論文，國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0207200917341567