Title

貝里斯新的給付措施是否能提供農民足夠誘因以改善甘蔗品質?

Translated Titles

Did the New Payment Scheme Provide Enough Incentives for Belizean Sugar Cane Farmers to Improve Product Quality?

Authors

瓦格納

Key Words

貝里斯糖業限制 ; 給付措施 ; 農民誘因 ; 甘蔗品質 ; Belize Sugar Industries Limited (BSIL) ; Core Sampling Payment Scheme ; Farmers Effort ; Sugar Cane Quality

PublicationName

臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2009年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

陳郁蕙

Content Language

英文

English Abstract

ABSTRACT In December 2008 sugar cane quality assessment by core sampling was introduced to determine the payment of cane delivered to the Belize Sugar Industries Limited. This scheme was implemented to address the issue of poor cane quality which had persisted in the sugar industry over the past decade as a result of the traditional method of cane payment that was based on quantity. A linear payment scheme was adopted to determine payment to farmers based on the reconciled relative factor of their sugar cane. This new method to determine cane payment referred to as the Core Sampling Payment Scheme was rejected by the cane farmers on the ninth week after its implementation and was subsequently abandoned. Innovation and policy changes are critical to Belize’s sugar industry especially since the industry needs to adapt to the erosion in preferential prices afforded by the European Union for its sugar exports. But policy changes are not easily accepted especially if farmers perceive that they are not provided with the appropriate payment incentives to improve their product quality. If farmers are not convinced of the fairness in payments from a system based on quantity to a new payment method based on quality to compensate them for their increase in effort utilization to improve product quality, then they will fail to embrace the implementation of this new payment scheme. This paper presents a generalized economic model to represent the relationship between farmer’s effort and cane quality under a payment system based on quantity. It expresses the changes in effort utilization and the profit maximization decision of the farmer that will occur from one payment scheme based on quantity to one on quality, and the impact of improved cane quality on the Belize Sugar Industries Limited cost of production. In reality it is difficult to implement a new payment scheme based on quality to replace a system on quantity because of the complexities involved to equitably determine and quantify the appropriate factors and variables to serve as the basis to determine the distribution of payments. Moreover there is also the resistance on the part of farmers who are unprepared to improve the quality of their cane without the help from their Farmers Association or from the industry itself. Since under the new payment scheme the Belize Sugar Industries Limited payment for sugar cane was the same as that under the traditional scheme, our analysis revealed that a possible approach to provide incentives for the majority of cane farmers to improve product quality was for the Belize Sugar Industries Limited to study the relationship between farmer’s effort and cane quality improvement and its impact on their cost of processing sugar, and share the gains that they would realize as a result of improved cane quality with the cane farmers. Otherwise only the farmers would incur the burden of improving their cane quality, while BSIL benefited from their efforts.

Topic Category 生物資源暨農學院 > 農業經濟學研究所
生物農學 > 農業
Reference
  1. Ali, M. 1995. “Quantifying the Socio-economic Determinants of Sustainable Crop Production: an Application to Wheat Cultivation in the Tarai of Nepal.” Agricultural Economics, Vol. 14 pp.45-60.
    連結:
  2. Belize Sugar Industries Limited (BSIL) Press Release. 2009. Retrieved on March 23rd, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://www.belize.org/index.php?option=com_ content&task=view&id=52&Itemid=86
    連結:
  3. Fjell, K. 2001. “A Cross-Subsidy Classification Framework.” Retrieved on February 24th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:
    連結:
  4. Gotor, E. and M. E. Tsigas. 2006. “Effects of EU Sugar Trade Reforms on Poor Households in Africa A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Retrieved on March 5th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:
    連結:
  5. Just, R.E. and D. Zilberman. 1983. “Stochastic Structure, Farm Size, and Technology Adoption in Developing Agriculture.” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 35 No.2, pp.307-28.
    連結:
  6. Odulaja, A. and F. Kiros. 1995. “Modelling agricultural production of small-scale farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study in western Kenya.” Agricultural Economics, Vol. 14 pp.85-91.
    連結:
  7. Pil, F.K. and J.P. MacDuffie. 1996. The Adoption of High-involvement Work Practices, Industrial Relations, Vol. 35 No.3, pp.423-55.
    連結:
  8. Shan, R. and P. Ward. 2003. Lean Manufacturing: Context, Practice Bundles, and Performance. , Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21 pp.129-49.
    連結:
  9. References
  10. Agritrade. 2009. “Sugar: Executive Brief, January 2009.” Retrieved on February 19th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://agritrade.cta.int/en/Resources/Agritrade-documents/Executive-briefs/Sugar-Executive-brief
  11. Statistical Institute of Belize. 2009. “Annual Report 2007/08 of the Statistical Institute of Belize of the Mid-Year Population Estimate for 2006.” Retrieved on March 24th, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cso.gov.bz/dms20uc/dynamicdata/docs/20080314164731_2.pdf
  12. Arias, G.Z., Z. R. Ruben, R. Verkerk, and M. van Boekel. 2008.
  13. “Economic Incentive for Improving Mangoe Quality in Costa Rica.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management Volume 25 Number 4. Retrieved June 12th 2009 from the World Wide Web:
  14. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?contentType=Article&Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0400250404.html
  15. Booker Tate. 2009. “Belize Sugar Cane Industries Limited.” Retrieved on February 7th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:
  16. http://www.bookertate.co.uk/images/6367c56a8a42413b8d62b0c876b19d92.pdf
  17. Central Bank of Belize. 2009. “Central Bank of Belize Annual Reports 2001-2007.” Retrieved on January 23rd, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.centralbank.org.bz/services3.asp?service=Annual+Report+
  18. Channel 5 Belize; January 28th, 2009 Online Newscast. “Cane farmers Strike Continue In Orange Walk.” Retrieved on March 23rd, 2009 from the World Wide Web:
  19. http://www.channel5belize.com/archive_detail_story.php?story_id=23104
  20. “Commission Decision of on the Annual Action Programme 2008 on Accompanying Measures on Sugar in favour of Belize to be financed under Article 21-060300 of the general budget of the European Communities.” Retrieved on February 4th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/documents /aap/2008/ec_aap-sugar-2008_bz_en.pdf
  21. http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPUP%2FPUP21_03%2FS0143814X01001143a.pdf&code=3db97e56a4f3e10e67d2aaa56a4c8e16
  22. Garside, B., T. Hills, J.C. Marques, C. Seeger, and V. Thiel. 2005. “Who Gains from Sugar Quotas?” London: Overseas Development Institute and London School of Economics and Political Science, 2005. Retrieved on February 5th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://www.odi.org.uk/iedg /projects/EU_banana_sugar_ markets/ ODI_LSE_SugarProject_2005.pdf
  23. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/2724.pdf
  24. Khorana, S. 2006. “The Development Relevance of Trade Preferences: An Analysis on Switzerland.” Retrieved on May 23rd, 2009 from the World Wide Web:
  25. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2006/papers/Khorana.pdf
  26. Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries. Annual Report 2005. Retrieved on April 6th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://www.agriculture.gov.bz/PDF/Annual_repo rt_2005.pdf
  27. Mortimer, L.R. 1992. Detailed Information on Belize. Retrieved on January 27th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://ambergriscaye.com/pages/town/factsmass.html
  28. Ozden, C. and E. Reinhardt. 2003. “The Perversity of Preferences, The Generalized System of Preferences and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976-2000.” Policy Research Working Paper 2955, Washington: The World Bank Development Research Group.
  29. Second Reading of the Sugar Industry Bill. (1999). Retrieved on January 28th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://www.governmentofbelize.gov.bz/ press_ release_details.php?pr_id=1103
  30. Simpson, A., P. Wright, and W. Fray. “The Impact of Harvesting on the Viability of Sugarcane Production in the Wet West.” Retrieved on June 3rd, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://wist.jamaicasugar.org/Proceedings/Impact%20of %20 harvesting%20on%20the%20viability%20of%20sugarcane%20production.pdf
  31. USDA. 2009. “World raw sugar price, monthly, quarterly, and by calendar and fiscal year.” Retrieved on April 21st 2009 from the World Wide Web:
  32. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Sugar/Data.htm
  33. Tillet, R. Cogeneration in Belize, Diversifying the Sugar Cane Industry. Retrieved on June 20th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://Caricom.org/jsp/projects/ Belize%20Presentation.ppt
  34. The Sugar Industry Act, Revised Edition 2003. Retrieved on January 27th, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/blz30695.pdf
  35. Varian, H.R. 1992. “Microeconomic Analysis Third Edition.” W.W. Norton & Company, New York, U.S.A.