Title

大學校園電算中心關鍵績效指標研究 -以台北護理學院為例

Translated Titles

The Study of University Campus Key Performance Indicators in Information Center - A Case Study at National Taipei College of Nursing

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2009.00671

Authors

劉毓慧

Key Words

績效衡量 ; 關鍵績效指標 ; 電算中心 ; Performance Measurement ; Key Performance Indicators ; Information Center

PublicationName

淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2009年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

黃明達

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究個案目前尚無完整的績效衡量制度,擬利用平衡計分卡建構研究個案的績效指標,將績效指標聚焦於財務、顧客、內部營運程序、學習與成長四大構面,完成一個可量化、有效的、可靠度高的績效衡量方式。採用個案研究法、訪談及問卷調查完成各構面及指標權重計算後,建立本研究個案之績效衡量模式。 研究成果:1.本研究利用平衡計分卡為分類架構,完成研究個案各組績效指標與電算中心整體關鍵績效指標,提供主管做日後建置績效指標的參考;2.將研究過程記錄下來,研究個案各組與電算中心如何產生績效指標與目標值,讓日後研究者做參考;3.本研究發現訂定指標權重配置,需經過審慎討論,再逐期調整,此過程可供研究個案不同行政單位建置績效指標參考。

English Abstract

This study case still not complete performance measurement system, to construct a case study using the Balanced Scorecard of performance indicators, performance indicators will focus on financial, customer, internal operating procedures, learning and growth of the four dimensions, the completion of a volume of and effective and highly reliable way to measure performance. After using the case methodology, the interview and the questionnaire survey complete each construction surface and the target weight computation, establishes achievements of a case study of the performance measurement model. Research results: 1. In this study, for the classification of the Balanced Scorecard framework, completes the study case each group of achievements target and the electricity calculated that the central whole essential achievements target, will provide the manager to do will establish the achievements target in the future the reference; 2. It will study the process to record, the study case each group and the electricity calculated how the center does have the achievements target and the target value, will let the researcher make the reference in the future; 3. This study discovery schedules the target weight disposition, must pass through discusses carefully, chases the time adjustment again, this process may supply the research case different Administrative unit to establish the achievements target reference.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 資訊管理學系碩士在職專班
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 1. 于泳泓,2002,「從台灣企業成功導入平衡計分卡實例談平衡計分卡導入的三大步驟要點與手法」,會計月刊,第199期,84-92頁。
    連結:
  2. 4. 吳安妮,2003,「平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討」,研考雙月刊,第27卷,第5期,45-61頁。
    連結:
  3. 5. 李允傑,2007,「公部門績效評估技術與指標」,研考雙月刊,第31卷,第2期,26-39頁。
    連結:
  4. 6. 李珊珊,2007,「平衡計分卡發展關鍵績效指標之介紹」,國研科技,第15期,58-61頁。
    連結:
  5. 10. 林嘉誠,2004,「公部門績效評估技術與指標建立」,國家政策季刊,第3卷,第2期,1-20頁。
    連結:
  6. 11. 范祥偉等,2000,「政府績效管理:分析架構與實務策略」,行政評論,第10卷,第1期。
    連結:
  7. 13. 莊文忠,2008,「績效衡量與指標設計:方法論上的討論」,公共行政學報,第29期,61-91頁。
    連結:
  8. 15. 連志龍、蘇志雄、江志民,2008,「銀行業務之KPI研究-以台灣地區信用卡為例」,數據分析,第3卷,第2期,1-18頁。
    連結:
  9. 17. 劉順仁,2007「非營業基金之績效管理-談平衡計分卡之應用」,研考雙月刊,第31卷,第2期,77-87頁。
    連結:
  10. 21. 張火燦、余月美,2008,「服務品質、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度關係之研究」,明新學報,第34卷,第1 期,127-140頁。
    連結:
  11. 23. Ahmed, A. M., David, D., & Robert, L., 2005, “Non-financial Performance measurement in manufacturing companies,” The British Accounting Review 37, pp261-297.
    連結:
  12. 25. Bilgin, K. U., 2007, “Performance Management for Public Personnel: Multi-Analysis Approach Toward Personnel,” Public Personnel Management, 36(2), pp.93-114.
    連結:
  13. 26. Bowin, R. B. & Harvey, D. F., “Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach,” (2nd ED.), Person Education Inc.
    連結:
  14. 28. Evan M. Berman, 1998, “Productivity in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Strategies and Techniques,” Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
    連結:
  15. 30. Igal M. Shohet, 2003, “Key Performance Indicators for Maintenance of Health-Care Facilities,” Facilities, (21: 1/2), pp.5-12.
    連結:
  16. 34. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., 1996, “The Balanced Scorecard Translating Strategy into Action,” Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
    連結:
  17. 35. Kotler, Philip, 1996, “Englewood Cliffs” Marketing Management (9th ED.), NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    連結:
  18. 37. Niven, P. R., 2002, “Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results,” New York, John Willey & Sons.
    連結:
  19. 38. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L., 1996, “The behavioral consequences of service quality,” Journal of Marketing, (60), pp.31-46.
    連結:
  20. 40. Rodney A. Stewart, & Sherif Mohamed, 2001, “Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction ,” Construction Innovation (1) pp.147-163.
    連結:
  21. 45. William K. Brooks, & Garry D. Coleman, 2003, “Evaluating Key Performance Indicators Used to Drive Contractor Behavior at AEDC,” Engineering Management Journal, (15:4), pp.29-39.
    連結:
  22. 2. 于躍門,2005,「非營利組織運用平衡計分卡的可能性」,逢甲合作經濟季刊,第37期,20-28頁。
  23. 3. 吳安妮,1996,「平衡記分卡轉換策略行為(上)」,會計研究月刊,第134期,133-139頁。
  24. 7. 邱吉鶴、黃宏光,2004,「企業績效評估實務之探討」,政府績效評估(初版),行政院研考會,23-60頁。
  25. 8. 邱清治,1984,「我國企業資訊部門績效評估之研究」,政治大學企管研究所碩士論文。
  26. 9. 林世君,2007,「建立系所品質屋 訂定關鍵績效指標」。淡江時報,第699期。
  27. 12. 孫文琦、陳天惠、陳正哲,2007,「應用LISREL分析服務品質與顧客滿意度之研究」,工商管理學刊,第3卷,第1期,19-24頁。
  28. 14. 莊尚志、邱妍禎,2008,「平衡計分卡與績效管理」,彰銀資料,第57卷第7期,4-17頁。
  29. 16. 張亮明,周惠文,2002「應用平衡計分卡提升資訊委外績效之研究-以某研究單位資訊系統為例」,中央大學資管所碩士論文。
  30. 18. 陳高山,2007,「關鍵績效指標管理(KPIM」。網址:http://www.aheadmaster.com/AheadWeb/eNews/VieweNews-1.Aspx。
  31. 19. 陳萬淇,1992,「個案研究法」,台北:華泰文化。
  32. 20. 賀全慶,1998,「以顧客滿意為導向的專案工作規劃」,中華民國品質學會第34屆年會暨第4屆全國品質管理研討會論文集,495-503頁。
  33. 22. 黃明達、林東毅,2005,「大學資訊中心KPI研究-以淡江大學為例」,資訊管理展望,第7卷,第1期,95-118頁。
  34. 24. Armstrong, M & Baron, A., 1998, “Performance Management,” London: IPD House.
  35. 27. Czepiel, J. A., Rosenberg, L. J. & Akerele, A, 1974, “Perspectives on Consumer Satisfaction,” AMA Conference Proceedings, pp119-123.
  36. 29. Fletcher, H. D., & Smith, D. B., 2004, “Managing for value: Developing a performance measurement system integrating EVA and BSC in strategic planning,” Journal of Business Strategies, (21), pp.1-17.
  37. 31. Hatry, H. P. , 2006, “Performance Measurement: Getting Results,” (2nd ED.), Washington, D. C., The Urban Institute Press.
  38. 32. Hendry, C., Bradley, P. & Perkins, S., 1997, “Missed a Motivator,” People Management, (11), pp.20-25.
  39. 33. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., 1992, “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures: That Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review (70:1), pp.72-79.
  40. 36. Meyer, M. W., 2002, “Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Scorecard,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. 39. Peter F. Drucker, 1973, “Management Tasks, Responsibilities Practices,” New York, Harper & Row.
  42. 41. Rockart, J. F., Earl, M. J., & Ross, J. W., 1996, “Eight Imperatives for the New IT Organization,” Sloan Management Review (38:1), pp43-55.
  43. 42. Rose, Kenneth H, 1995, “A Performance Measurement Model,” ASQC American Society for Quality Control (28:2), pp.63-66.
  44. 43. Rose, Kenneth H, 1995, “A Performance Measurement Model,” Quality Progress, (28:2).pp.63-66.
  45. 44. Webster, F., 1994, “Defining the new marketing concept,” Marketing Management, (2), pp.22-31.
  46. 46. Vilarinho, P. M. & Carinhas, A., 2005, “Designing The Balance Scorecard For A R&D Unit At The University of AVEIRO,” 35th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, pp.2043-2048.