雙打對桌球團體比賽的勝負非常具有影響力。為了在桌球雙打比賽中贏得勝利,選手必須依靠純熟的戰術執行,但目前研究大部分都著重於技術訓練,對戰術訓練方法則較少,且目前桌球相關的分析法沒有探討戰術方面的分析。另外在比賽時,選手的人格特質對比賽的表現及結果具有影響力,但此因素卻少被考慮近選手的訓練中,因此本研究發展一植基於人格特質之桌球雙打前三板技戰術模型。藉由模型產生的分析表及價值模型,讓教練及選手更能清楚的看出不同的人格配對在比賽中所使用的戰術之價值,並以此為基礎探討訓練方針。另本研究依研究結果開發了一植基於人格特質之桌球雙打前三板技戰術分析系統。此系統能夠提供教練記錄及查詢選手所使用的戰術情況,並依結果給予合適的訓練。 本研究錄製了31場雙打比賽,並發放問卷,共收集了50組雙打配對。有四種較適合桌球運動的人格,分別為堅韌型、自控型、進取型及理智型,並由這四種人格組合成十種人格配對。將人格納入模型中後,即產生出分析表及戰術價值模型,並歸納出不同人格配對的戰術建議、勝利技戰術建議及失敗技術改善建議。最後再結合資訊科技,建置了多媒體系統來呈現不同人格配對所使用的戰術狀況。 研究結果為:(一)在戰術建議上,主動戰術較能帶給雙打最後的勝利。(二)勝利技術建議上,除了正、反手側發球之外,如:堅韌與堅韌配對的勝利技術為反手側切擋和正手側拉攻;自控與進取配對的勝利技術為反手側撥攻。(三)在失敗技術建議上,應加強訓練較不熟練的技術,或在比賽時,減少使用較容易失分的技術,以致在比賽中可以降低比賽的失分率。
The outcome of doubles is very influential in the table tennis group team competition. In order to win the table tennis doubles competition, athletes must rely on the execution of skillful tactics. However, most research for table tennis training is focusing on techniques, intead of tactics. Also the analysis methods of table tennis have not explored in the aspects of tactics. Furthermore, the athletes’ personality has an impact on the game performance and results during the competition. But this factor is less to be considered into athletes’ training. Thus the goal of this study is to develop a first-three hit techniques and tactics analysis model for table tennis doubles based on personality. Depending on the analysis which is generated by the model, the results can offer a training guide based on different personality matches for coaches and athletes to realize the tactics. Moreover, according to the results, this study develops a techniques and tactics analysis computer system based on the model. This system can provide coaches a function of recording and inquiring the tactics used by athletes, and let coaches set up suitable training programs in accordance with the results. This study recorded 50 doubles games, and distributed questionnaires. There were four personalities which are more suitable for table tennis, respectively hardiness, autonomy, extraversion and conscientiousness, and then by combining these four personalities into ten personality pairs. After combining the personalities into the model, it came up with the analysis table and the tactic value model, which summarized the tactics recommendation, winning and failure of techniques advice on the basis of personality pairs. The research results are: (a) For the tactics recommendation, offensive tactics are more able to bring the victory. (b) For techniques advice, in addition to the forehand and backhand serve, the suggested techniques for hardiness v.s. hardiness are backhand block and forehand spin; the suggested technique for autonomy v.s. extraversion is backhand flip. (c) Athletes should do more practice on those unskilled techniques, or use less those techniques which were easier to lose points.