緒論:本研究目的在比較實施翻轉教學與傳統教學兩種不同策略在籃球技能表現之效益。方法:本研究採用準實驗設計,以宜蘭某大學的籃球興趣選項學生(年齡為18.6±0.4歲)為對象,實驗期間為15週,分實驗組與控制組兩個班級,介入10週的教學策略,每週2節課,每節50分鐘,研究工具為籃球技能測驗,所得資料以共變數進行分析,顯著水準定為α=.05。結果:經過10週的教學介入後,翻轉教學組與傳統教學組在運球技能無顯著差異,但在投籃(F=8.19, p<.05)和傳球(F=4.64, p<.05)則有顯著的提升。結論:翻轉教學的方法能增進學生在籃球學習中的投籃及傳球技能。因籃球是屬團隊性的運動,需倚靠隊友之間的溝通、合作及協調,來共同達到高層次的學習效益。因此研究建議,針對學生比賽表現的綜合能力進行評量是未來可以努力的方向。
Introduction: The propose of this research was to compare the implementation of flipping and traditional teaching in two different strategies, to explored the learning efficiency of basketball class with interest option students in basketball performance. Methods: The quasi-experimental design was used two interest option basketball classes of a collage in Yilan. Participants age were 18.6 ± 0.4. The total experimental period was 15 weeks. Both of the experimental and control group were to intervening the teaching strategy through 10 weeks, 2 lessons per week, 50 minutes each. The research test tools were basketball skills test. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA. All significant levels were α = .05. Results: After 10 weeks of teaching intervention, there was no significant difference in dribbling skills between the flipped group and the traditional group, but significant in shooting (F = 8.190, p < .05) and passing (F = 4.636, p < .05). Conclusion: The flip teaching method can improved students' shooting and passing skills in basketball learning, but it had limited impact on dribbling skills. Suggests in future research that because basketball is a team sport, it need to rely on communication, cooperation, and coordination between teammates to achieve learning results. Therefore, evaluating the comprehensive ability of students' competition performance will the direction that can be worked hard in the future.