網路成癮、網路偏差及網路被害者之關係: 人的聚合還是網路活動場域的聚合？

The Overlap Of Internet Addiction, Deviance And Victimhood: Birds Of A Feather Flock Together Or Routine Activities?

王茜(Wang, Chien)

指導教授 ： 周愫嫻

國立臺北大學/社會科學學院/犯罪學研究所/碩士(2014年)

摘要

本文比較「網路成癮者」、「網路偏差者」及「網路被害者」三者之重疊性，並進一步分析其背後重疊的原因。過去文獻對三者之重疊性的解釋主要有兩派說法，一為「物以類聚」的「人格論」，亦即三者具備某種人格特質或行為傾向，以至於互有重疊；另一種則是「場域論」，三組人格特性不盡相同，然經常處在同一場域與時間，屬於活動場域的重疊使然。本研究採次級資料分析，分析了2,864名桃園縣國中生使用網路行為調查資料。結果發現：（一）三組比例：成癮組13.2%，偏差組7.5%，被害組16.3%；重疊組比例：成癮偏差組3.1%，偏差被害組3.5%，成癮被害組4.6%，成癮偏差被害組1.8%。（二）三組的人格特質有差異，但成癮組和被害組較為類似。（三）三組的父母教育程度及上網特性高度類似。（四）三組同儕均喜好上網咖，曾結交不良同儕與網路偏差好友。（五）三組上網習慣高度類似，假期上網頻率高。（六）三組偏好網站的差異大，偏差與被害組無共通偏好之網站。從上述結果歸納，人格因素對三者聚合的影響似乎不大，交友情形及上網習慣對聚合的影響較大，就上網習慣集中在假日且好友特性高度類似的情形看來，網路場域相遇的機率較高，故本研究認為三者之關係偏向網路活動之場域聚合，並非同類學生的聚合。

關鍵字

日常活動理論 ； 網路被害 ； 網路偏差 ； 網路成癮

並列摘要

This study intends to compare three kinds of teenagers who have experienced “internet addiction”, “internet deviance”, or “internet victimhood”. The study sought to find out the nature of the overlap (if any) of these three groups and the reason why they seem to gather together. According to the existing literature, there are two main reasons to explain why these three go together, one is personality the other is environment. Some claim that people who have similar personalities or behaviors make them gather together; Otherwise, their personalities may be quite different but they surf the same website so that can be assembled. This study analyzes a sample of 2,864 junior high school students in Tao-Yuan County.
Results found that (1) The percentage of three groups: internet addiction accounts for 13.2%, internet deviance accounts for 7.5%, internet victim accounts for 16.3%; The percentage of overlapping groups: addiction deviance accounts for 3.1%, deviance victim accounts for 3.5%, addiction victim accounts for 4.6%, addiction deviance victim accounts for1.8%. (2) The personalities of the three groups are different, but the group of internet addiction is similar to internet victim. (3) Parents educational level and internet usage from these three groups are quite similar. (4) Their peers are deviant teenagers who like to go to internet cafés. (5) Their internet usage is similar, and they usually surf the net during weekends and holidays. (6) Their internet preferences are quite different, even for deviance and victim.
Thus, the study concludes that the three groups overlap mainly by their common routine activities rather than similar personalities.

並列關鍵字

Internet Victim ； Internet Deviance ； Internet Addiction ； Routine Activity Theory

參考文獻

李佳蓁（2006）。高職學生網路成癮相關因素及學習成就之探討。私立中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，桃園。

吳嫦娥，（2004）。未成年人網路偏差與被害問題透視。透視犯罪問題，4，26-30。

江南逸（2003）。網路成癮與青少年偏差，透視犯罪問題，2，37-44。

魏希聖、李致中、王宛雯（2006）。高中職學生網路成癮之危險因子與偏差行為研究: 以台中縣霧峰大里地區為例。臺中教育大學學報，20，1，89-105。

黃芳銘、楊金寶（2004）。從被害者理論探討國中女生網路交友性侵害潛在危險之研究。師大學報，49，（1）：21-40。