Abstract Erlin Township, Changhua County, is a traditional agricultural town. Due to the wine grapes contract farming of Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau(TTWMB) , Erlin Township become Taiwan's largest wine grape growing region, and had a wave of prosperity since late 1970s to the mid-1990s. However, since the mid-1990s, wine grapes contract farming was terminated, the wine grapes farming was forced to transfer its relations of production from planned economy to free market economy, and wine grapes farmers was forced to have production adjustment. In 2009 government planed to develop Erlin Science Park project. This project represents industrial capital and speculative capital expansion to the rural area , and state as an intermediary to plunder agricultural land, water and other resources of rural area, thus Erlin farmers face direct crisis. Since 2008, I involved in participant observation in Erlin area, and since 2009 I started to involved in the anti-eviction action of Xianxiliao village. Through participant observation and co-action with the peasant inspire me to think of peasant’s subjectivity, and raised awareness of the following three questions: First, how peasants make a living? Second, why peasants turned to rebel? Third, how they act in rebellion? I want to have more comprehensive understanding of subjectivity of peasants through these three questions. In Chapter three, I found that Erlin peasants show a risk management and diverse part-time job, and other flexible livelihood strategies, and does not exclude to use expansion of production scale and increasing capital investment approach to adjust production, but still maintained the logic of family economy to make a living. It is a kind of everyday-life rebellion against market economy that peasants can adapt market economy but still maintain the economic logic of family economy. In chapter five, I reflect my own social action with peasants of Xianxiliao village. I found that peasants’ action is based on the life experience that include personal relationships , body experience of against the colonial and state capital, and how to deal with local political power. What’s more they take family’s survival as principle of collective action.In sum, I think that Taiwan peasants are actors that take family labor-consumer balance and family’s survival as principle logical of action, and have multiple and flexible strategy of livelihood and resistance .