透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.115.179
  • 學位論文

老房舍•新主人:生活感民宿的自力空間營造

Old Houses and New Dwellers: Self-reliant Space Creation of Sense-of-living Home-stays

指導教授 : 劉可強

摘要


臺灣民宿產業自1990年代起蓬勃發展,從基本的民家投宿到專職經營的異國風情旅店,民宿早已脫離棲身或是消費的論述範圍。本文藉由生活感民宿另類的空間改造及主客關係角度切入,探討以舊房舍改造民宿為核心所發展的1)生產與生活方式、2)空間改造實踐及3)價值體系如何在民宿主人及民宿旅人流動的關係與認同中,逐漸往返凝聚,並且形成一離散式社群網絡。   研究發現,生活感民宿除了是民宿主人維持生計的生產方式,同時也是相關個體對於「理想生活方式」追尋的體現典範,主客交流多在探討生活方式的認同與實踐;另一方面,舊房舍自力改造的檢視突顯出相關個體對於居住空間的需求,包含生活感(sense of living) 、真實性(authenticity)以及綠色再利用,因為個體所具備之能力不同,民宿空間於此亦被視為另一種典範;生活感民宿社群網絡呈現離散連結的關係,且仍在持續發展作用當中,網際網路平台對現階段網絡的形構有一定的影響力。

關鍵字

生活感 民宿 老房舍 自力營造 生活方式

並列摘要


This essay gives a specific viewpoint toward the self-reliant rebuilding behavior for pre-owned houses turned into home-stays. Starting from the successional observations about space reconstructions and relationships between hosts and visitors, the three main analytic treatises are: 1. making a living and life, 2. practicing of space re-creation, and 3. value system and ideology, the analysis reveals the causes of an emerging social network. The flowing relationship and identity result from interaction back and forth between hosts and visitors. Since the development of home-stay inns in Taiwan from the 1990s’ untill now, it is no lomger sufficent to discuss only the theme in rest and comsumption domains. The “sense-of-living home-stay” is not only a way of making a living, but it is also a greatly practical paragon of searching for the ideal life. Hosts and visitors interact frequently and profoundly in discussing practices and identity to the way of living and space making. This social network composed of the effects between links and diaspora has been developing; and the internet platform has affected the form of this social network. On the other hand, the survey of “sense-of-living home-stay” self-reliant re-creation exhibits demands, for dwelling and living, including “sense of living”, “authenticity”, and “green reuse.” Due to the different abilities the hosts possess, multiform home-stay spaces are seen as alternative models. These models that concern the interaction between old spaces and new behaviors, which are called “palimpsest” in this essay, can be a kind of consultation when people make their home spaces.

參考文獻


鍾佩林(2006)《住屋空間營造中的身體與生活空間互動之研究》。私立中原大學室內設計學系碩士論文。
黃舒楣(2004)《生活風格的創製:民宿狂潮中的意義生產與想像漂流》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
謝宜亨(2005)《宜蘭民宿空間發展模型之建立》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
林梓聯(2001)〈台灣的民宿〉《農業經營管理會訊》,27,3-5。
李金龍(2002)《農村民宿經營管理手冊》。台北:行政院農業委員會。

被引用紀錄


吳湘寧(2014)。老屋新生命-背包客民宿分析與品牌視覺識別系統設計〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400466
張暐舜(2014)。從臺灣農村民宿女主人談農村婦女的生命經驗與賦權〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01988
陳婉寧(2013)。參與式設計如何行?-以中國民間環保組織自然之友低碳家庭子項目「居家節能改造」為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01754
呂宜華(2012)。媒體再現鄉村性──以《台客練習曲》為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02694

延伸閱讀