透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.165.66
  • 學位論文

司法安置少年逃離安置機構原因之探討

Running Away from Residential Care:Experiences for Juvenile Delinquents

指導教授 : 周愫嫻
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


安置輔導為少年事件處理法於1997年修法後新增之保護處分,主要融入社區處遇的精神,將虞犯或輕微犯罪之少年安置於適當之福利或教養機構。在過去許多研究中,皆提出了安置機構在實務上面臨之困境與問題,例如機構數量與人力不足、定位不明等,但極少研究針對逃跑安置個案進行瞭解與探討其逃跑之原因。本篇主旨即在運用抑制理論之外在拉力、外在抑制力、內在抑制立與內在推力等四種推拉力探究逃跑司法安置少年於安置歷程中的適應狀況,分析安置少年逃離安置機構之因素,進而提出改變安置少年逃離安置機構的選擇過程。本研究深入訪談7位因少年事件處理法第四十二條第一項第三款進入安置程序,且於安置期間,有逃跑一次以上之經驗,透過受訪者本身的特殊經驗,加以整理與分析受訪者共同之逃跑促成因素。 本研究共有以下發現: 一、生活的不適應與人際關係的挫折是受訪者逃離安置機構的主要原因。 二、家人、社工與個案本身為受訪者放棄在外逃離的三個因素。 三、安置機構存在秘密權力結構。 四、社工人員與機構同學間標籤作用力量大。 五、逃跑事件並非完全只有負面作用。 六、安置少年認同安置機構具懲罰性。 根據以上發現,本研究針對安置機構、司法安置與未來之研究等面向提出下列建議: 一、對安置機構之建議 (一)建構個案─社工─家庭三角雙向溝通機制。 (二)減少機構中的霸凌行為。 (三)保密原則的嚴格遵守。 (四)資訊流通的正確性與適當性。 (五)監控機制的落實。 二、對司法安置的建議 (一)專業與專責機構的設置。 (二)鬆綁放假之嚴格規定。 三、對未來研究之建議 (一)區別安置期間長短的差異。

並列摘要


In 1997, residential treatment was established as a new policy by the Juvenile Delinquency Treatment Law, the aim was to apply community treatment to these delinquents, put them into proper residential care or welfare institutions. There were many studies which explored the difficulties and problems in residential care, such as shortage of manpower and orientation toward protection or punishment, but few researches have been conducted on those who ran away from residential care – yet this issue might tell us something important. The present study uses Reckless’s containment theory(outer pulls, external containment, internal containment, inner pushes) to discuss adaptive life in residential care, and the reason why juridical residential cases may result in people running away from residential care. Seven cases were studied, where there was at least one experience of running away from residential care . The interview findings are as follows: 1.The two main reasons behind running away from residential care are: difficulty in adapting to life in residential cares and the relationships with classmates or social workers in that environment. 2.Three factors which seemed to push towards a return residential care were their family, social workers and themselves. 3.There is a hidden power structure in residential care. 4.Running away has a large negative stigma. 5.Yet the negative effect of running away, may assist in making their thoughts mature and learning to face up to the facts. 6.Generally speaking, going into residential care is seen as a punitive measure. This research recommends the following: 1. For residential care: (1) Construct easier communication pathways between family members, social workers and those in care. (2) Reduce bullying incidents in residential care. (3) Social workers need to strictly abide by confidentiality principles. (4) The correctness and aptness of information or hearsay should be given attention in the residential cares. 2. For juridical residential treatment: (1) To establish professionally developed institutions for those juvenile delinquents. (2) Deregulate the strict rules about holidays. 3. For future research (1) It should take the ethos of residential care into consideration.

參考文獻


李自強,2002,〈安置輔導職執行的因應策略-從社工與司法的觀點出發〉。《朝陽人文社會學刊》,1(1):101-120。
彭淑華,2006,(保護為名,權控為實?-少年安置機構工作人員的觀點分析)。《東吳社會工作學報》,15:1-36。
彭淑華,2007a,(機構安置:保護他(她)?傷害他(她)?-兒童少年保護工作人員眼中之機構虐待圖像)。《東吳社會工作學報》,16:1-36。
彭淑華,2007b,〈「寧缺毋濫」?「寧濫無缺」?兒童少年保護工作人員機構安置決策困境之研究〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,2:127-154。
陳毓文,2008,〈國內接受機構安置少年憂鬱情緒之探究:問題陳顯與解釋因素〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,1:75-101。

被引用紀錄


梁乃文(2018)。避風港裡的波濤洶湧— 少年安置機構社會工作者情緒勞動經驗之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800513
黃麗慎(2013)。「九天將團」經驗 - 另類的少年安置輔導處遇〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0407201316221000
何明晃(2015)。少年司法介入虞犯處理之研究—以司法院釋字第664號解釋為核心〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614015037

延伸閱讀