透過您的圖書館登入
IP:34.236.134.129
  • Journals

唯一選項或民主選擇台北、北京、華府關於兩岸關係前景的爭議

One Choice or Democratic Options: Taiwan's Future and Taipei-Beijing-Washington Relations

Abstracts


國共的共同語言「一個中國,台灣是中國的一部份」,在九十年代以後,由於台灣的民主化,而有不同聲音。國民黨出現「兩個中國」的傾向,民進黨出現「台灣獨立」的主張。經過九六年台海飛彈危機,台灣獨立的選項已被排除,成為中共堅持的統一是「惟一選項」,或民進黨政府提出的維持現狀、統一或其他可能選項的「民主選擇」,此「民主選擇」並獲美國支持。兩岸未來之關係有兩種可能,一為政治關係不確定,但經濟交流持續成長,如過去十四年之發展,或政治關係穩定,因而雙方多方面關係能加強。發展的方向繫於中共如何解讀民進黨政府上任後的兩岸關係的發展。

Keywords

台灣 中共 美國 一個中國 民主選擇

Parallel abstracts


”One China, with Taiwan being a part of China” has been the common language between the Koumintang (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for nearly forty years. A different voice has appeared in the 1990's, however, due to Taiwan's democratization. During the early 90's, there was the general tendency towards ”Two Chinas” within the KMT while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) stuck with ”Taiwan Independence.” After the 1996 Taiwan Strait Missile Crisis, the Taiwan Independence option has been limited and there remains only the other options: unification with the Mainland, (which Beijing insists is the only choice) or keeping the choice open (maintaining the status quo, unifying with the Mainland, or other possible options). The latter is the offer made by the DPP. These democratic options are also supported by the United States. The future development between Taipei and Beijing are of two possibilities political uncertainty with increased economic exchanges or political stability with accelerated mutual relations. The direction take relations will depend on China's view of recent developments since the DPP government's accession to power.

Parallel keywords

Taiwan China The United States One China Democratic options

References


張亞中 Chang, Ya-Chung(1999)。兩岸未來:有關簽署「兩岸基礎協定」的思考 The 'Cross-Taiwan Strait Basic Agreement' and the Future of Taiwan and Mainland China。問題與研究 Wenti Yu Yanjiu。38(9)
(2000)。「一個中國的原則與台灣問題」白皮書。北京:國務院台灣辦公室。
Harbron, John D.(1974).Canada Recognizes China.Toronto:Canadian Institute of International Affairs.
Hsiao, Gene T.(1974).The Sino-Japanese Rapprochement: A Relationship of Ambivalence.The China Quarterly.
Jones, Water S.(1996).The Logic of International Relations.New York:Longman.

Cited by


賀復興(2006)。兩岸統合問題探討—從邦聯模式分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2006.01045
陳俊義(2005)。民進黨執政下的台美中三邊關係演變-以2000至2004年為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2005.00289
汪匡平(2005)。國家目標與軍事力量互動之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.10368
詹俊彥(2005)。胡錦濤時期的中共對台政策〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.10265
許淑幸(2005)。兩岸互動制度化之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.01721

Read-around