透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.149.233
  • 期刊

地方政府委託私人辦理實驗教育之研究:以宜蘭人文中小學解約為例

The Study on One Privatized School Terminated by Local Government in Taiwan

摘要


1970年代興起的新公共管理帶來「公私協力」模式,同時使得我國在1990年代開啟一連串教育改革,而體制外之教育需求—實驗教育及家長教育選擇權,開始逐步受到政府重視,並使實驗教育走向合法化。直至2014年立法制定實驗教育三法—公辦公營學校方式、公辦民營學校方式、非學校型態方式,更使實驗教育走向興盛化,截至109學年度我國已有13所公辦民營學校,較過去幾乎成倍數成長。公辦民營學校即為公私協力代表類型之一而本文所探討的個案學校即為實驗教育三法通過後,首次出現協力失靈的案件,惟目前公辦民營學校之協力失靈相關文獻仍不充足。據此,本文使用文件分析法,來探進行探討,並得出以下結論:代理人理論可用於解釋本次解約事件、現行政策環境與法令仍限制實驗教育、協力夥伴關係尚待建立。

並列摘要


The trend of New Public Management in 1970s urged each government to care about demands from citizens and the quality of public service so much that Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) showed up. Likewise, education reform in Taiwan began in 1990s, so experimental education and school choice were emphasized as well. Taiwan didn't legislate 3 laws for experimental education- public school、privatized schools and nonschool until 2014. Up to 2020, there are 13 privatized schools in Taiwan. However, due to the lack of concerned literature to discuss Collaborative Partnership between the local government and private sector, this study chose one case school that terminated by one local government and applied documentary analysis to explain possible reasons. Finally, some results present as follow: This case can be explained through agency theory, decision-making environments and modern regulations restrict experimental education and collaborative partnership needs establishing.

參考文獻


林淑馨(2018a)。協力神話的崩壞?我國地方政府與非營利組織的協力現況。公共行政學報,55,1‒36。https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201809_(55).0001[Lin, S.-H. (2018a). The fall of collaborative governance? Current collaboration between local governments and non-profit organizations. Journal of Public Administration, 55, 1‒36. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201809_(55).0001]
柯于璋(2020)。公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責――以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例。公共行政學報,58,55‒87。 https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202003_(58).0002[Ke, Y.-C. (2020). Controversies and accountability of public-private partnerships: The case of cultural and creative industrial park in R.O.C. Journal of Public Administration, 58, 55‒87. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202003_(58).0002]
曾冠球(2011a)。為何淪為不情願夥伴 ?—公私夥伴關係失靈個案的制度解釋。 臺灣民主季刊,8(4),83‒133。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.201112.0089[Tseng, K.-C. (2011a). Becoming reluctant partners? An institutionalist explanation on a futile case of public-private partnerships (PPPs). Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 8(4), 83‒133. https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.201112.0089]
曾冠球、黃偉誠(2011b)。公共管理者對於公私合夥風險的認知:調查與反思。 公共行政學報,41,1‒36。 https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201112_(41).0001[Tseng, K.-C., & Huang, W.-C. (2011b). Exploring the public manager’s perceptions of risks in public-private partnerships. Journal of Public Administration, 41, 1‒36. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201112_(41).0001]
謝崇傳、王傑真(2021)。臺灣實驗教育的發展與策進:後現代視角。學校行政雙月刊,136,188‒200。[Shieh, C.-C., & Wang, C.-C. (2021). A study of Taiwan’s experimental education development and promoting: A post-modern perspective. School Administration, 136, 188‒200. https://doi.org/ 10.6423/HHHC.202111_(136).0009]

延伸閱讀