透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.205.60
  • 期刊

性交易該除罪化嗎?對性別平等論證的幾點省思

Should Sexual Transaction be Decriminalized? Some Reflections on the Arguments from Gender Equality

摘要


成人性交易的除罪化與否,近年來引發了諸多爭議。部分除罪化論者表示:除罪化(亦即「娼嫖皆不罰」)有利於賣淫婦女的人權保障,有助於打擊性產業所包藏的諸多罪惡,如強制賣淫、高度性剝削、強暴及虐待等情事。部分關切兩性平等的反除罪化論者則強調:那些罪惡是賣淫體制的當然產物;賣淫體制具有高度的強制性;性交易是一種男人對女人的性宰制、性剝削、性暴力,嚴重侵害了女性的平等地位和性自主權利。通過對這些性別平等論證的分析,本文將申論指出:當前以男嫖女娼為大宗的賣淫體制,的確可以理解為一種男人對女人的性/別宰制;但即使如此,除罪化(此指「合意的成人性交易無罪」、「娼嫖皆不罰」)仍是合理的改革選項。直接禁止性交易,未必有利於性別平等;而「娼嫖皆不罰」將有助於政府對性產業進行更有效的管制,對性犯罪進行更有效的打擊。從促進性別平等、為婦女培力的角度,既然賣淫體制難以禁絕,如若「娼嫖皆不罰」(相對於「罰娼」、「罰嫖」或「娼嫖皆罰」)更有助於改善弱勢賣淫婦女的不利處境,且未必妨礙性別平等之推進,那我們將有相當強的政治道德理由去支持這個改革路徑。

關鍵字

性交易 除罪化 賣淫 性別平等 性宰制

並列摘要


Should consensual sexual transaction between adults be decriminalized? Many proponents of decriminalization contend that the legal prohibition on prostitution, far from promoting gender equality, has had enormous negative effects on sex workers in general and female prostitutes in particular. Decriminalization, it is often added, could help combat such evils as forced prostitution, sexual exploitation by pimps, abuse by the police, sexual violence by customers, etc. Nonetheless, many radical feminists insist that prostitution be condemned as an institution of male sexual domination that seriously violates women's right to equal status and sexual autonomy. Thus conceived, prostitution must necessarily be abolished instead of being normalized through decriminalization. This paper argues, partly with radical feminists, that prostitution as it exists today could indeed be criticized as an institution of male sexual domination. Given, however, that this institution could hardly be abolished via prohibition, decriminalization remains a reasonable reform strategy even if we take seriously the feminist arguments from gender equality. Important though the feminist critique of prostitution is, decriminalization in itself might not be as detrimental to gender equality as many radical feminists would have it.

參考文獻


Belle de Jour、嚴韻譯(2006)。250天倫敦應召日記。台北:圓神。
Block, L.尤傳莉譯(2005)。繁花將盡。台北:臉譜。
何春蕤、甯應斌、丁乃非(2005)。性政治入門:台灣性運演講集。中壢:中央大學性/別研究室。
陳之嶽(2008)。州長買春風暴。亞洲週刊。22(12),28-29。
甯應斌(2002)。性工作是否為「工作」?馬克思的商品論與性工作的社會建構論。台灣社會研究季刊。46,87-139。

被引用紀錄


蘇芳儀(2014)。我國性交易管制: 從女性主義與實證研究評析社會秩序維護法〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2014.00049
賈馥華(2017)。媒介性交易罪之立法正當性〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700172
劉立方(2013)。我國成人性交易管理政策形成過程之研究—以政策網絡觀點分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01224
鄧思文(2012)。性交易法制的社會控制意涵:性自主的考察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01378
孫一萱(2014)。台灣性交易管制法理與現狀的再思考─釋字第666號之後的管制〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613593042

延伸閱讀