透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.237.153
  • 期刊

朱子命蔡沈編修《書集傳》考

Zhu Xi's Request to Cai Shen to Compile the Collected Commentaries on the Book of Documents

摘要


朱子經學著述豐富,卻缺《尚書》及《春秋》著述。一般認為朱子將注解《尚書》託付予蔡沈,從而得出蔡沈為朱子《書》學得意門人的結論。此文則梳理書翰、語錄相關記載,分析朱子遲未注《尚書》的主觀心理因素,並考察朱子晚年選定門人參與編修《書傳》的實際過程,發現蔡沈並非朱子原本屬意門人,而是逝世前半年開始注意到蔡沈在《尚書》方面的見解,並有意安排他參與《書集傳》的編修。無奈朱子驟然辭世,倉促之下,便遺命蔡沈撰作《書集傳》,也從而造成蔡沈與朱子《書》說存在出入的現象。

關鍵字

朱熹 蔡沈 朱子學 尚書 書集傳

並列摘要


Zhu Xi 朱熹 wrote extensively on the Classics, but not on the Book of Documents 尚書or the Spring and Autumn Annals 春秋 It is generally believed that Zhu Xi entrusted Cai Shen 蔡沈 with the task of annotating the Book of Documents, and therefore that Cai was his favorite pupil with respect to the Book. This study brings together relevant records such as quotations and letters to analyze why Zhu Xi did not produce his own annotated Book of Documents. and investigate how he actually came to select his pupil to compile the Collected Commentaries on the Book of Documents 書集傳. This study finds that Cai Shen was not initially one of Zhu Xi's favorite pupils; it was in fact only six months before his death that Zhu Xi began to take notice of Cai Shen's understanding of the Book of Documents, and purposely arranged for Cai Shen to participate in the compilation of the Collected Commentaries. Unfortunatey, Zhu Xi suddenly became ill and died, hurriedly leaving instructions that Cai Shen should write the Collected Commentaries himself. This resulted in the inconsistencies that exist between master and pupil's views on the Book of Documents.

參考文獻


漢孔安國傳、唐孔穎達正義、清阮元校勘(1989)。尚書正義。臺北:大化書局。
漢趙岐注、宋孫奭疏、清阮元校勘(1989)。孟子注疏。臺北:大化書局。
漢班固(1996)。漢書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
宋朱熹、陳俊民校訂(2000)。朱子文集。臺北:德富文教基金會。
(1985)。景印文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

被引用紀錄


柯明杰(2011)。利用元件特性以最小化老化效應對時序差異之影響〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100688
王奕然(2013)。朱熹門人考述及其思想研究-以黃榦、陳淳及蔡氏父子為論述核心〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418032031

延伸閱讀