大學生性別角色與自我概念的關係

The Relationship of Sex Role to Self-Concept in College Students

何英奇(Ying-Chyi Ho)

《教育心理學報》 14期 (1981/06) Pp. 221-230

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19810601.15

摘要

本研究係以大學程度的學生與參加師大暑期進修之學員共二○八名爲對象，探討性別角色與自我概念、內外制握信念的關係。所用的工具包括性別角色量表、田納西自我概念量表與洛氏內外制握量表。資料係採2（性別）×4（性別角色）多變項與單變項變異數分析加以處理。主要發現爲：(1)在內外制握分數上，性別與性別角色變項沒有顯著差異，(2)在兩性化、男性化、女性化與未分化等四類型角色中，兩性化型的自我概念特質屬於最肯定與最積極者，而未分化型者則反之。男性化型與女性化型的自我概念特質則與兩性化型者相近，亦屬積極性者。此外，並分析男女生接受傳統性別角色者和反傳統性别角色者，在自我概念上差異的原因。最後，根據研究結果，提出在輔導方面與日後研究方法之建議。

並列摘要

The relationship of sex role to self-concept and locus of control, was examined in this study. Two hundred and eight college students completed the Sex Role Inventory, Tennessee Self Concept Scale and Rotter's I-E Scale. The data were analyzed by 2(sex)×4(sex role)MANOVA and ANOVA. Findings indicated that: (1) There were no significant differences in I-E Scale scores between sexes and among four sex role idendities (androgynous, masculine, feminine and undifferentiated). (2) The androgynous Ss got the highst self-esteem scores, the undifferentiated Ss the lowest, and the masculine and feminine Ss' scores were close to that of the androgynous Ss'. The differences in self-esteem scores between traditional sex role identities (masculine men, feminine women) and cross-sex identities (feminine men, masculine women) were also discussed. Finally, The implications for counseling and further research were suggested.