透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.200.66
  • 期刊

登山者遊憩專門化與登山類型偏好

Recreation Specialization and Preference of Mountaineering

摘要


過去在遊憩專門化相關研究中大多認爲專門化爲線性且依程度分爲低、中、高等不同層級進行遊憩管理或場所依戀等觀念的探討。本研究引用McIntyre和Pigram(1992)所提出專門化環的概念來度量專門化的程度,並進一步探討是否會有不同專門化類型的差異而影響實際登山行爲的偏好?研究中以認知、情感與行爲三個專門化面向擬定結構式問卷,共取得474份有效問卷,將三面向所得之測量分數各自加總後,轉成爲標準化分數(z score)進行後續統計分析。研究結果發現:1.集群分析結果得到六種不同類型登山者,分別爲「玩票型登山者」、「入門型登山者」、「實踐型登山者」、「情感型登山者」、「認知型登山者」以及「專業型登山者」。2.不同專門化類型的登山者在認知、情感以及行爲上各有不同程度的展現。3.不同專門化類型的登山者,在性別、年齡、山齡、居住地區、平均收入、社團參與狀況以及專業學習狀況上會有顯著差異。4.登山者專門化類型在高山、中級山與郊山的偏好上有顯著差異。

關鍵字

遊憩專門化 登山 登山類型

並列摘要


Past studies regarding specialization of island dwellers, has often regarded recreation specialization traits as linear, they discuss recreational management, or place attachment, according to the degree and range of specialization, such as low, middle, and high levels. This study measured the degree of specialization according circularity of the recreation specialization, which was offered by McIntyre & Pigram (1992), and researched whether there are any differences among the various types of mountaineers, which may, or may not affect the emotional preferences of the behaviors of mountaineering. The structural questionnaires were performed by cognitive, behavioral, and affective dimensions of recreational specialization. A total of 474 mountaineers' questionnaires were completed. We obtained the Z score by adding the scores of individual dimensions, which we then standardized, followed by analysis of the statistical values. Cluster analysis results indicated that there were six groups of specialized styles, which were amateur mountaineers, beginning mountaineers, practicing mountaineers, affective mountaineers, cognitive mountaineers, and professional mountaineers. There were different features regarding specialization styles in the cognitive, behavioral, and affective degrees. Mountaineers with different specialization styles showed significant differences in their sex, age, mountain age, living area, average income, club involvements, and professional training. The specialized styles of mountaineers displayed significant differences in their preference for mountain altitudes; high, moderate, and low-level altitudes.

參考文獻


交通部觀光局(1997)。山岳遊憩系統資源評估與規劃。台北:交通部觀光局。
李素馨(1994)。典型相關分析-專業程度、遊憩動機和基地屬性認知關係之探討。戶外遊憩研究。7(3),39-62。
邱紫穎譯、平郁合譯、Don, H.、Kurt, H.著(1999)。登山聖經。台北:商業週刊。
歐陽慧真(2002)。賞鳥者專門化程度與場所依戀關係之研究-以七股濕地爲例(碩士論文)。東海大學景觀學研究所。
2003國家公園章山研討會:全民登山運動之推展-以小百岳規劃爲例

被引用紀錄


陳翰均(2013)。場地特性、遊憩專門化與心流體驗之關聯性研究–以虎尾鎮網球俱樂部之運動參與者為例〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6827/NFU.2013.00133
唐燕娟(2014)。家庭露營者遊憩專門化、休閒效益與家庭氣氛之關係性研究〔碩士論文,台南應用科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6821/TUT.2014.00043
吳昀昌(2014)。臺灣百岳登山者遊憩專門化與環境態度關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2014.00243
許庭瑄(2021)。鐵人三項認真休閒者遊憩專門化進程研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101180
林喜雯(2010)。應用方法目的鏈探討登山與健行活動之體驗價值認知〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.03417

延伸閱讀