證據概念──從高中歷史課綱到教學問題探析

The Concept of Evidence: From National Curriculums to Historical Teaching

林慈淑(Lin, Tzu-shu)

《臺大歷史學報》 58期 (2016/12) Pp. 249-286

https://doi.org/10.6253/ntuhistory.2016.58.06

摘要

本文旨在探討證據概念與歷史課綱、歷史教學之關係。證據是歷史知識賴以建構的基礎，也是重要的歷史學科概念，而臺灣自1996 年頒布「高級中學課程暫行綱要（九五）：歷史」（「95 暫綱」）以來，「史料證據」便列入其中，是學生必須獲得的四個「核心能力」之一。然初步調查，培養學生證據概念這點，並未出現在一般教師於課堂中引介資料的期待和考慮中，顯示課綱所載和實際教學間存在極大落差。為了解教師在落實資料證據教學上可能面臨的困難，本文以英國1970 年以來證據教學的經驗與瓶頸為對照，凸顯教學者掌握資料和證據之別，以及證據之意義是首要之事。最後，本文也由英美歷史教育學者的反思和討論闡明：教師使用資料、培養學生對證據的認知，必須透過探究模式的教學，始有可能。

關鍵字

證據概念 ； 歷史課綱 ； 歷史教學

並列摘要

The present article sets out to explore the concept of evidence in the perspective of high school's national curriculums and school's history classes. History is a matter of interpretating evidence. Therefore the concept of evidence is an important element in historical thinking that children should learn in history classrooms. Indeed, ＂sources as evidence＂ have been written in the official documents on Taiwan's National Curriculum for High School history since 1996. But, according to my research, teachers in general seem to lack any idea of using sources to inspire students' understanding of evidence. This means there is a huge gap between ideal and reality. In order to comprehend the possible reasons for this discrepancy, this article reviews the development of teaching evidence in historical education in the UK since the 1970's, and reveals that teachers first need to realize what evidence is and then to realize the difference between ＂source＂ and ＂evidence＂ if they want to help students to learn the concept of evidence. This article concludes that the most effective way to teach evidence is through classroom activities of historical enquiry.

並列關鍵字

Evidence ； national curriculum ； history teaching

參考文獻

王健文(2008)。圖像是另外一種文本─歷史教科書中的圖文關係。翰林社會天地。13，2-8。

布洛克、周婉窈譯(1991)。史家的技藝。臺北:遠流出版公司。

艾什比劉城譯(1993)。歷史課堂的史料教學。清華歷史教學。2，109-113。

李稚勇(2012)。中英美中學歷史課史料教學比較研究。上海師範大學學報（哲學社會科學版）。41(2)，125-136。

林慈淑、劉靜貞()。