透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.131.178
  • 期刊

《老子》的渾沌思維與倫理關懷

The Chaos and Ethical Concerns in the "Laozi"

摘要


本文從「渾沌」意象著手,探討《老子》渾沌之道的雙重結構:一是在存 有論方面,它呈現「有無同出而異名」的弔詭邏輯。另一在倫理學方面,它亦呈現出渾沌與秩序的不一不二之詭譎狀態。而本文的核心重點更在於《老子》的倫理關懷,嘗試從渾沌思維中,揭露渾沌玄德具有治療二元結構的慈柔力量,此尤其可用「上善若水」的水德來隱喻。而《老子》這種批判並治療二元規範倫理,包容、納受「他者」之柔性關懷,筆者稱其為原初倫理。而道家的渾沌與秩序之不一、不二關係,正可反應在原初倫理與規範倫理的關係上,即原初倫理既對規範倫理具有批判性,但兩者亦可具有來往之交涉性格,而非單純的二元對立。對此,《老子》和《莊子》則同中有異,即在不一不二的共同前提上,《老子》更突顯不一之拯治面向,而《莊子》則更強調不二之圓通面向。

關鍵字

老子 渾沌 秩序 倫理 他者

並列摘要


Started with the image of chaos, this paper probes into the dual structure of chaos in the "Laozi". The first structure is ontology; it shows the curious logic of the well-known saying "Existence and non-existence are from the same origin but have different names." The other is ethics, which demonstrates the strange sameness and difference of chaos and order. This paper focuses on Laozi's ethical concern, disclosing that the "xuan-de" 'profound virtue' has the tender power that can cure the dual structure and can particularly be compared to with the virtue of water in the phrase "The best virtue is like water." "Primitive ethic" is what this paper calls this tender care that criticizes and cures the dual regulation ethic and tolerates others in the "Laozi". The balanced relation between chaos and order in Daoism is reflected in the relation between the primitive ethic and the regulation ethic; in other words, primitive ethic contradicts regulation ethic but also interacts with it. Hence, the "Laozi" and the "Zhuangzi" are mostly the same but different in some ways. The "Laozi" emphasizes differences more than sameness whereas the "Zhuangzi" otherwise.

並列關鍵字

Laozi chaos order ethics others

參考文獻


袁珂(1982)。山海經校注。臺北:里仁書局。
陳鼓應 註譯(1991)。老子今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
(1998)。老子。北京:中華書局。
清郭慶藩(1985)。莊子集釋。臺北=Taipei:華正書局=Hua Cheng。
陳鼓應 註譯(1999)。莊子今注今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

被引用紀錄


李姍(2018)。觀點、時間與他者:《莊子・秋水》的倫理反思〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800244
許漢祥(2022)。氣化宇宙創生下的空間展演—再讀王延壽〈魯靈光殿賦〉淡江中文學報(47),211-244。https://doi.org/10.6187/tkujcl.202212_(47).0007

延伸閱讀