透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.248.208
  • 期刊

以LVQ-ESW推估受訪者未知抽樣權重之研究

Estimating Missing Sampling Weights by Using LVQ-ESW Method in a CFA Model

摘要


本研究主要提出未知分層權重(stratum weights)的估算法以協助推估母體之確認性因素分析(CFA)之參數。在大型調查研究中,需因應樣本的抽樣機率的不均等,而必須搭配使用正確的取樣權重資料,才能正確地推論母體的統計模型參數。但是當樣本的分層權重資料未知時,若將這些資料全數剔除(listwise deletions)或忽略權重效應,尤其是當未知或遺失資料並非完全隨機遺失(如:MAR)時,將很可能導致推估母體樣貌時的嚴重偏誤。 本研究提出LVQ-ESW權重估算方法,即應用學習向量量化網絡(learning vector quantization network, LVQ)的計算方法以估算樣本在不同分層間的可能權重,再以此插補為其分層權重估算值(Estimated Stratum Weights, ESW)。LVQ的方法並不需事先假設資料之統計分配,依此所得的分層權重可以客觀地區辨各個分層。本研究以數值模擬實驗方法評估LVQ-ESW的正確性及穩定度,實驗設計中包含了多種不同組合的遺失比例、取樣數、取樣不均勻及層間變異。研究結果顯現LVQ-ESW在各個向度中都明顯優於剔除法及不使用權重,也證實了它有相當的正確率及穩定度。本文最後並對此方法的實際應用提出討論及建議。

並列摘要


The paper proposes estimated missing stratum weights (ESW) to infer populationwise parameters of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models in a stratified sampling survey. In large survey research, using stratum weights has been proved to be able to ensure proper statistical inferences for populationwise parameters in CFA models (e.g., 蔡良庭、 楊志堅,2008; Asparouhov, 2005; Yang & Tsai, 2006) and others (e.g., Little, 1991). Similarly, importance of properly dealing with missing at random (MAR) data (e.g., Little & Rubin, 1987; Little & Schenker, 1994) in survey research cannot be overemphasized. Yet, methods to analyze observations with missing stratum weights received less attention than they should. The estimated stratum weights (ESW) is thus proposed to impute missing weights of observations; specifically, ESW is implemented by optimumizing learning vector quantization networks (LVQ) (蔡良庭、楊志堅,2004; White, 1989). Experimental factors, including missing proportions, sampling sizes, unbalanced stratifications and stratified variations, are designed to examine performances of LVQ-ESW in numerical simulation studies. Results show that accuracies and stabilities of LVQ-ESW are much better than the other two methods in all categories of comparisons. Conclusions and discussions are provided for some practical guidelines.

並列關鍵字

CFA Estimated Stratum Weights LVQ Missing at Random

參考文獻


張苙雲、關秉寅、黃敏雄、王麗雲()。,未出版。
章英華、傅仰止()。
楊志堅、蔡良庭(2008)。評估取樣權重於檢定Likert問卷之測量恆等性研究。中華心理學刊。50,257-269。
蔡良庭、楊志堅(2004)。學習向量量化網路分類之模擬研究。測驗統計年刊。12,269-291。
蔡良庭、楊志堅(2008)。取樣權重值於應用SEM模式分析之參數估算正確性研究。教育與心理研究。31,155-170。

延伸閱讀