透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.65.65
  • 期刊

釋『修辭立其誠』:原始儒家的天道觀與語言觀-兼論宋儒的章句學

Reading the Sentence Xiuci li qi cheng: An Essay on the Way of Heaven and Language in Early Confucian Moral Theory-With Critical Comments on Song Dynasty Exegetic Scholarship

摘要


本文把《易.文言》「修辭立其誠」當作一句儒家「下學上達」的話,通過對《中庸》誠的觀念的重新解釋,對這句話進行了解讀。《中庸》的誠有三個層面,分別是宗教或神靈的誠、天道的誠、和心性的誠。前二者同屬超人文領域,後者則落在躬行實踐的道德層面。其中最值得注意的是天道層面的誠的概念。一方面它指的是一種超人文所以也是非道德的境界,另一方面,這境界因為也是修為所要達到的目標,所以誠這概念也被賦予最高的道德意義。本文認為〈文言〉這句話概括了這個修為階梯同時也凸出語言所處的關鍵地位。中國古代哲人重視語言規範,他們認識到語言的虛妄性格,因此嚴肅的對待語言,要求通過對語言行為的檢束達到淨化意識的效果,因此而回復到自然的認知狀態,只有真實,更無虛妄。宋儒解經,以後世的義理架構強加古人,過分強調誠的心性層面,又不謹守語文學規範,遂於「進德」「居業」文義之間,進退失據,無法自圓其說。

關鍵字

易傳 文言 孟子 中庸 朱子(熹) 程伊川(頤) 天道觀 語言觀 語文學 修辭

並列摘要


A close reading of the Confucian Classic ”Zhong Yong” or ”On the Doctrine of the Mean reveals” that its central concept cheng (ch'eng), which has commonly been translated as sincerity but would certainly fare better otherwise, perhaps with a freshly coined noun ”realness,” has ramifications pertaining to three different spheres of reality: the religious or numinous, the sphere of the Way of Heaven, and that of human moral practice. I would argue in this paper that it is this second sense of the word, rather than the third one, that could provide a most satisfactory reading for the famous passage about the relationship between language and reality xiuci li qi cheng of ”Wenyan”, one of the Documents in the ”Book of Change”. With this and other examples I show how Neo-Confucian scholars of the Song Dynasty tended to misread even the basic Confucian Classics as they, because, making no effort to set high standards in philological discipline for themselves, always inadvertently interpreted the Classics in terms of later metaphysics.

參考文獻


清王念孫。經義述聞
劉述先(1997)。論孔子思想中隱涵的「天人合一」一貫之道─一個當代新儒家的闡釋。中國文哲研究集刊。10,1-23。
龐樸(1980)。帛書五行篇研究
(1970).Philosophical papers.
論語

被引用紀錄


夏婉雲(2013)。臺灣詩人的囚與逃──以商禽、蘇紹連、唐捐為抽樣〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00375
林素娟(2017)。天秩有禮、觀象制文-戰國儒家的德之體驗及禮文化成清華學報47(3),433-471。https://doi.org/10.6503/THJCS.2017.47(3).01
蔡士瑋(2008)。從《論語》和《孟子》論「樂」〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.00115
李欣霖(2016)。荀子生命教育思想研究〔博士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.P0155866
梅廣(2021)。《中庸》新編分章解義臺大中文學報(75),1-3+5-53。https://doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.202112_(75).0001

延伸閱讀