當代自由民主的侷限：理論與制度層次之初步考察

The Limits of Liberal Democracy: A Nascent Analysis Based on Theoretical and Institutional Perspectives

陳文政(Wen-Cheng CHEN) ； 莊旻達(Min-Ta CHUANG)

《哲學與文化》 46卷2期 (2019/02) Pp. 5-32

摘要

1989年後，隨著冷戰結束，歷史終結論甚囂塵上，論者多認為自由主義式民主已是人類終極最佳政府形式，更有論者預言威權體制終將崩潰，自由主義式民主被視為主流典範體制。然時序進入21世紀後的全球政治現實並未如預期。一方面全球民主出現12年持續衰退，另方面威權韌性則因展現治理實績而益加彰顯，再方面則是混合體制漸受青睞。於此情況，自由主義式民主似乎面臨了種種侷限。吾人要如何掌握這些侷限呢？本文以「理論與制度的內憂外患」為概念架構，對自由民主之種種侷限和挑戰進行體系性初步考察。分析結果顯示：當代自由主義式民主不僅在理論上有內部限制和外部挑戰，在制度上也有內在侷限和外部制約，其典範赤字已昭然若揭。那麼，自由民主之未來將如何？本文認為吾人應進一步深究自由民主各種侷限之根源，作為自由民主更新或體制調整之參考。

關鍵字

自由主義式民主 ； 理論限制 ； 制度制約 ； 理性自利選擇論 ； 權利導向個人主義 ； 自我修正能力論

並列摘要

The argument that liberal democracy is the end of history has prevailed since the end of the Cold War in 1989. Many commentators announced that liberal democracy will be the final and the best form of human government. Moreover, some scholars predicted that those authoritarian regimes will inevitably collapse in years. Under these circumstances, liberal democracy seems to be recognized as the dominant paradigm regime. However, the global landscape demonstrated by the political reality from the beginning of the 21^(st) century does not confirm that argument and prediction. On the one side, both advanced and emerging democracies have suffered from democratic recession in 12 consecutive years from 2006; on the other side, the authoritarian resilience has been proved by credible performance of state governance in core authoritarian states like China and Russia. What are the challenges and limits of liberal democracy? This article tries to make a nascent systematic analysis on these issues by offering a reflective conceptual framework focused on ＂troubles within and without, theoretical and institutional.＂ It finds that, on the one hand, three theoretical premises upon which liberal democracy embeds have suffered from respective defects; on the other hand, liberal democracy, while implemented by institutional arrangements, has its intrinsic and extrinsic limits in light of global practical experiences. Accordingly, because liberal democracy has suffered from paradigm deficits, it is hardly considered as the end of history. What is the future of liberal democracy? This article suggests that we might make efforts to delve into the real causes of its limits in order to find out the approaches for democratic revival or regime adjustment.

並列關鍵字

Liberal Democracy ； Theoretical Limit ； Institutional Restraint ； Rational Choice Based on Self-interest ； Rights-based Individualism ； Selfcorrecting Ability

參考文獻

朱雲漢，《高思在雲：一個知識份子對二十一世紀的思考》，臺北：天下文化，2015。

江宜樺，《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，臺北：揚智文化，2000。

威爾．金里卡（Will Kymlicka），《當代政治哲學導論》，劉莘譯，臺北：聯經出版公司，2003。

陳文政，〈全球憲政主義之興起：典範競逐觀點的初步考察〉，《臺北大學法學論叢》88(2013): 1-81。

陳文政、許禎元，〈儒家價值論述及其當代意涵：市場經濟全球化脈絡下的分析〉，《哲學與文化》42.9(2015): 129-164。