透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.147.190
  • 期刊

書業與獄訟-從晚明出版文化論余象斗公案小說的編篡過程與創作意圖

Publication and Lawsuit: Research on the Compilation Process and Creative Intention of Yu Xiangdou's Detective-Style Novel as Seen through the Late-Ming Publication Culture

摘要


余象斗於萬曆二十六年,出版一部與包公案迥異之公案小說《廉明公案》其後又編纂一部《諸司公案》,作為《廉明公案》續編出版。二書中皆出現大量狀詞與判決文,在抽絲剝繭之情節發展中交代法律條文,並於序文中主張唯有賄賂消散,真正的正義才能顯現。余象斗為何作如此序文?其又因何在架構上進行改變?本文從此諸問題出發,首先論述明朝訴訟情況與公案小說流行之相互關係;進而分析《廉明公案》與《諸司公案》之架構與內容,結合同時期之法律用書與日用類書等出版讀物,從中分析書坊主編纂出版與公案小說發展變化之密切關係,進而探討其記載犯罪背後之商業動機。

並列摘要


Yu Xiangdou published a detective-style novel ”Lianming gong'an” in 1598 that was totally different from Baa gong'an and later on wrote ”Zhusi gong” 'an as the continuation of ”Lianming gong'an”. There are a large number of legal statements and verdict papers in both of them, in addition to law clauses interwoven with the development of the story plot describing painstaking investigations; the author contended in the preface that real justice could be revealed only when corruption is dissipated. Why did Yu Xiangdou write this preface? And why did he make such a change in the framework of the detective novel genre? In this article I will answer these questions by first discussing the correlation between the situation of litigation and the popularity of detective-style fiction in the Ming dynasty. Next, I will analyze the framework and contents of both ”Lianming gong'an” and ”Zhusi gong 'an”. Then, using published law books and encyclopedias from the same period, I will analyze the close relationships between book publishing by booksellers, and the development of detective-style novels. Finally, I will explore the commercial motives behind the records of crime.

參考文獻


方彥壽(2003)。建陽刻書史。北京:中國社會出版社。
方彥壽(1990)。元典章。北京:中國書店。
白凱(2003)。中國的婦女與財產:960-1949。上海:上海書店。
西周生輯、袁世碩校注、鄒宗良校注(2000)。醒世姻緣傳。臺北:三民書局。
竹林浪叟:《新鍥蕭曹遺筆》,萬曆二十三年(1595)金陵刊本,東京大學東洋文化研究所藏。

被引用紀錄


洪敬清(2020)。《神明公案》殘本研究中國學術年刊(42_2),173-200。https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.202009_(42-2).07

延伸閱讀