《神明公案》殘本研究

The Studies on the Extant Fragments of Shen Ming Gong An

洪敬清(ANG, JING-QING)

《中國學術年刊》 42_2期 (2020/09) Pp. 173-200

https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.202009_(42-2).07

摘要

《神明公案》全稱《鼎雕國朝憲臺折獄蘇冤神明公案》，因闕葉的關係，致使其刊刻者與刊刻年分不詳。此書現存十二則案例，其中三則因無目有文、闕葉導致故事不全，另有半葉插圖四幅，為我們保留了重要的文本訊息。本文依據上海古籍出版社於1990年出版之《古本小說集成》收錄的《神明公案》為觀察，試圖從編纂策略、敘事特色兩大面向，深掘《神明公案》與明代萬曆年間湧現的公案小說之可能關係。透過上述的提問與論析，《神明公案》現存案例雖然無法讓我們掌握其真實全貌，但是透過卷一、二所保留的連貫性案例，我們得以從案例之間的關係，進一步分析《神明公案》的編纂策略以及敘事特色，填補過去明代公案小說研究中所缺席的位置。

關鍵字

《神明公案》 ； 出版文化 ； 余象斗 ； 《廉明公案》 ； 《諸司公案》

並列摘要

Shen Ming Gong An is known as Ding Diao Guo Chao Xian Tai Zhe Yu Su Yuan Shen Ming Gong An in full, yet its author and the year of publication are both unknown due to the missing pages. In total, there are 12 legal cases preserved in this book; three of which are incomplete resulted from titleless and missing pages, and four illustrations covering one of the half pages preserve important textual information of the time. This paper investigates the potential relations between this book and other detective-style novels appeared during the Ming dynasty in terms of their compilation strategies and narrative features. The investigation is based on the study of Shen Ming Gong An which was included in Gu Ben Xiao Shuo Ji Cheng, a publication of Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House in 1990. Through the abovementioned questions and analyses, despite the fact that the existing legal cases in Shen Ming Gong An do not present the full picture, we can still further analyze the compilation strategies and narrative features of Shen Ming Gong An from the perspective of the relationships among those continuity legal cases preserved in volume 1 and 2. In doing so, it is able to fill the missing gap in the past studies of Ming dynasty detective-style novels.

並列關鍵字

Shen Ming Gong An ； publishing culture ； Yu Xiangdou ； Lian Ming Gong An ； Zhu Si Gong An

參考文獻

林桂如LIN, KUEI-JU：〈書業與獄訟——從晚明出版文化論余象斗公案小說的編纂過程與創作意圖〉“Publication and Lawsuit: Research on the Compilation Process and Creative Intention of Yu Xiangdou's Detective-Style Novel as Seen through the Late-Ming Publication Culture”，《中國文哲研究所集刊》Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica 第39期（2011年9月），頁1-39。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6351/BICLP.201109.0001。

林桂如LIN, KUEI-JU：〈漢儒、書賈與作家：論《棠陰比事》在江戶初期之傳播〉“Confucians, Publishers and Writers the Spread of T'ang-yin-pi-shih in early Edo Japan”，《政大中文學報》Bulletin of the Department of Chinese Literature, National Chengchi University第24期（2015年12月），頁33-64。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30407/BDCL.201512_(24).0002

楊緒容YANG, XU-RONG：〈明書判體公案小說集之間的相互關係及文體演變〉“A Study of the Interrelations of Lawsuit Fiction Collections in Ming Dynasty and the Development of Their Styles”，《復旦學報（社會科學版）》Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition) 第1期（2005年1月），頁110-116+131。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-0289.2005.01.015

明・王同軌WANG, TONG-GUI：《耳談類增》Er Tan Lei Zeng（臺北Taipei：國家圖書館National Central Library藏國圖代管原平圖古籍微片，明萬曆三十一年金陵書賈唐晟刊本）。

明・竹林浪叟ZHU LIN LANG SOU：《新鍥蕭曹遺筆》Xin Qie Xiao Cao Yi Bi（東京Tokyo：東京大學東洋文化研究所Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo藏，明萬曆二十三年序刊本）。