大學入學管道與學業表現－以北部某私立大學為例

Admission Channels in Matriculation and Academic Performance - A Case Study of One Northern Private University

陶宏麟(Hung-Lin Tao) ； 吳幸蓁(Shing-Jen Wu) ； 陳碧綉(Bih-Show Chen) ； 楊怡雯(Yi-Wen Yang)

《經濟論文叢刊》 48卷2期 (2020/06) Pp. 221-268

https://doi.org/10.6277/TER.202006_48(2).0003

摘要

本文分析北部某私立大學100至104學年五個年度入學學生於大學前兩學年的學業成績，發現三種入學管道的學生，不論是以原始分數、系排名、標準化Z值代表學業表現，均以繁星生最佳，申請生次之，指考生最差，這樣的結論也適用只採計必修科目。繁星生在數理相關科系表現不如在非數理相關科系表現，但仍顯著優於指考生。指考生在課業投入、學習滿意、就學穩定上都較繁星生或申請生差。繁星生在課業投入雖然顯著大於指考生，但這無法解釋他們成績爲什麼優於指考生。高中成績可相當程度解釋繁星生的好成績，但仍無法完全解釋，本文試圖提出原因。

關鍵字

大學入學 ； 申請 ； 繁星 ； 指考

並列摘要

In this paper we analyze first two years' academic performance of students admitted to one northern private university from the years 2011 to 2015. The result shows that academic performance of students from the Multi-stars program is best, whether using grades, ranking in department or z-score as measuring standards for academic performance. This result still holds when using only required courses. Next to students from the Multi-stars program are students from the Application channel, while students from the Joint College Entrance Exam (JCEE) channel are worst in academic performance. The academic performance of students from the Multi-stars program in math and science related departments is worse than their performance in non-math and science departments. Nonetheless their performance is still significantly better than students from the JCEE channel. Academic performance of students from the JCEE channel are worse than students from the Multi-stars channel or Application channel in academic hour inputs, learning satisfaction, and academic status stability. The superior performance of students from the Multi-stars channel over students from the JCEE channel can not be explained by more academic hour inputs. Grades from high-school might be a good reason for their superior academic performance in university. But this factor is not the sole reason for the superiority of the Multi-stars channel students. In this paper, we try to give some other explanations.

並列關鍵字

matriculation ； application ； multi-star ； exam-entrance

參考文獻

王秀槐與黃金俊 (2010), “擇其所愛、愛其所擇: 從自我決定理論看大學多元入學制度中學生的科系選擇與學習成果,” 《教育科學研究期刊》, 55(2), 1-27。 (Wang, Hsiou-Huai and Chin-Chun Huang (2010),“The Application of Self-Determination Theory on Students’ Career Choice and Learning Outcomes under the Multiple College Admission System,”Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 1–27.)

田芳華與傅祖壇 (2009), “大學多元入學制度: 學生家庭社經背景與學業成就之比較,” 《教育與科學研究期刊》, 54(1), 209-233。 (Tien, Fang-Hua and Tsu-Tan Fu (2009), “Multi-Channel College Entrance System: Relationship between Family Background, Academic Achievement and Entrance Channels,” Journal of Research in Education Sciences,54(1), 209–233.)

李浩仲, 李文傑, 與連賢明 (2016), “哪類孩子最受教? 從政大校務資料看學生表現,” 2016 台灣經濟學會年會研討會。 (Li, Hao-Chung, Wen-Chieh Li, and Hsien-Ming Lien (2016),“Who Is More Likely to Shine? Academic and Nonacademic Evidence From Students at National Cheng-chi University,” 2016 Taiwan Economic Association Annual Conference.)

李維倫, 古慧雯, 駱明慶, 與林明仁 (2018), “入學管道與學習表現,” 《經濟論文叢刊》, 48(1), 31-76。 (Lee, Wei-Lun, Hui-Wen Koo, Ming-Ching Luoh, and Ming-Jen Lin (2018), “Multi-channel Admission and Academic Achievement,” Taiwan Economic Review, 48(1), 31–76.)

陳婉琪, 陳承佑, 與林明仁 (2016), “台北大學校務資料分析: 多元入學管道與學業表現,” 2016台灣經濟學會年會研討會。(Chen, Wan-Chi, Cheng-You Chen and Ming-Jen Lin (2016), “National Taipei University Institutional Research: Multiple Channels and Academic Performances,”2016 Taiwan Economic Association Annual Conference.)