以興與微言之辨：以蔡元培紅學的經學淵源為中心

Allegorical Metaphors versus Subtle Words: with Focus on the Classical Origins of Cai, Yuan-pei's Redology

李貴生(Kwai-Sang Lee)

《國文學報》 57期 (2015/06) Pp. 217-254

https://doi.org/10.6239/BOC.201506.08

摘要

本文以蔡元培的《石頭記索隱》為基礎，具體探討索隱派紅學與傳統經學的關係。文章首先檢討源出《春秋》學此一流行說法的不足之處，繼而闡明《詩經》傳箋之學對蔡元培紅學的詮釋視野及其操作方法的影響。經過深入辨析後，我們認為蔡氏索隱的詮釋取向實與傳統《詩經》學有更為密切的關係，而他所列舉的三種研究方法中，亦有兩項與傳箋之學相契合。這些發現有助闡明經學詮釋傳統對文學批評的影響。

關鍵字

比興 ； 微言 ； 蔡元培 ； 紅學 ； 經學 ； 淵源

並列摘要

Based on Cai's ＂Shitouji suoyin＂ (An Allegorical Reading of The Story of the Stone), this article will investigate the relations between ＂Suoyin＂ Redology and tradition Classical studies. It will first review the shortcomings of a prevalent view that the ＂Suoyin＂ method is originated from the studies of ＂Chunqiu＂ (The Spring and Autumn Annals), and then illustrate how the exegetical studies of Shijing (The Book of Odes) influences on the hermeneutical horizon as well as the modus operandi of Cai's Redology. After a close examination, we assert that the hermeneutical approach of Cai's ＂Suoyin＂ is deeply connected to the traditional studies of ＂Shijing＂ and, among the three methods suggested by Cai, two of them are accorded with exegetical studies. These findings demonstrate the influence of classical exegeses on the criticism of literature.

並列關鍵字

Allegorical Metaphors ； Subtle Words ； Cai ； Yuan-pei ； Redology ； Classical Studies ； Origins

參考文獻

吳儀鳳：〈從《鶯鶯傳》自傳說看唐傳奇的詮釋方法〉，《中國學術年刊》第28期春季號（2006年3月），頁133-160。

單周堯：〈杜預《春秋經傳集解序》五情說補識〉，《中國文哲研究通訊》2010年第20卷第4期（2010年），頁79-119。

林義正：《春秋公羊傳倫理思維與特質》（臺北：臺大出版中心，2003年）。

Chen Jue, ‘“Shooting sand at people's shadow” Yingshe as a mode of representation in medieval Chinese Litereature, Monumenta Serica, Vol. 47 (1999), p. 199.

Chen Jue, “History and Fiction in the Gujing Ji (Record of an Ancient Mirror)”, Monumenta Serica, Vol. 52(2004), pp. 178-180.