The New Legal Paradigm of Jean Cohen and Its Implication for Public Online Dispute Resolution

寇恩新法律典範對公共線上爭議解決機制之啟發

陳起行(Chishing Chen)

《歐美研究》 37卷4期 (2007/12) Pp. 513-533

摘要

Cohen improves Teubner's reflexive legal paradigm to insure self-regulation stays in contact with the society-wide formation of public opinion and legal principles. This article discusses Cohen's paradigm and Sturm's analysis of the sexual harassment issue as the second generation of labor discrimination, which is compatible to Cohen's model. The author then illustrates how an improvement of Dworkin's theory of adjudication that emphasizes the inclusion of social dialogue can strengthen Cohen's paradigm, and how the development of public online dispute resolution can be an important step towards realizing Cohen's ideal.

關鍵字

reflexive ； self-regulation ； co-original ； legal principle ； public online dispute resolution

並列摘要

寇恩（Jean Cohen）改善屠布涅（Gunther Teubner）的自發性法律，以確保自律不會背離社會公共意見以及法律原則的要求。本文探討寇恩的法律理論以及史東（Susan Sturm）運用相容的理論解讀性騷擾這項美國第二代勞動歧視法律的發展。作者並且進一步指出，德渥金（Ronald Dworkin）的裁判理論可以藉由寇恩的法律典範加強社會對話，而後者的理論也會因此更形完整。最後，本文建議發展公共線上爭議解決機制，做為落實寇恩法律典範重要的一步。

並列關鍵字

自發性 ； 自律 ； 戶生性 ； 法律原則 ； 公共線上爭議解決

參考文獻

Balkin, J. M.(2004).Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society.New York University Law Review.79,1-55.

Chen, C.(2003).Reno v. ACLU-A case study of internet regulation and the court.EurAmerica.33(3),191-220.

Chen, C.,O. Zetterquist (Ed.)(2004).Law and modernity: Particular problems.Krakow, Poland:Polpress.

Chen, C.,C-K. Chiao (Ed.)(2007).Essays on important decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court: 2000-2003.Taipei:Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica.

Cohen, J.(2002).Regulating intimacy: A new legal paradigm.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.