透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.47.163
  • 期刊

Exploring the Differential Affections of Service Quality, Sacrifice, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction on University Students' Favorable and Unfavorable Behavioral Intentions

品質、付出、價值、與滿意度對大學生對學校的好惡行爲意圖的不同影響

摘要


大學生對學校的好惡行爲意圖影響其是否繼續留在校園之內。本文探討品質、付出、價值與滿意度等構面對好惡行爲意圖的影響。本研究先建立構面間的相互影響模式,並繼之設計問卷進行調查。研究結果證實前述構面對學生的好惡行爲意圖確實存在不同的影響。相關分析結果顯示:品質、付出、價值與滿意度等構面均正向地影響學生的“好”行爲意圖;然而,這些構面卻無法影響學生的“惡”行爲意圖。其所傳遞的管理意涵則爲:當學生感受到好的教育品質、有價值的學習並進而感到滿意,則他們對學校的“好”行爲意圖會被誘發;然而,這些正面的認知或感受卻無法抑制“惡”行爲意圖。故而,學校管理者必須戒慎行事並避免不適之舉措,以提昇學生的正面感受認知進而刺激“好”行爲意圖的產生。

關鍵字

品質 付出 價值 滿意 行爲意圖 高等教育

並列摘要


This study investigates the influences of quality, sacrifice, value and satisfaction on student favorable behavioral intentions (FBIs) and unfavorable behavioral intentions (UFBIs). This investigation first constructs the theoretical relationships between quality, sacrifice, value, satisfaction and FBIs/UFBIs, and then designs a survey instrument to gather data from a university. Analytical results reveal that quality, sacrifice, value and satisfaction influence FBIs and UFBIs differently. Quality, sacrifice, value and satisfaction positively influence FBIs in accordance with the multiattribute attitude framework. Meanwhile, the multiattribute attitude framework is not validated for UFBIs model, value and satisfaction were examined not to significantly and directly affect UFBIs. Students who perceive superior education quality, value the learning from university, and feel satisfied with their university are more likely to demonstrate their FBIs. However, delivering high quality and valuable education can satisfy students but cannot restrain student UFBIs in the event of problems occurring. Education managers must consider methods of stimulating student FBIs. Additionally, education managers must also establish an appropriate setting to prevent problems and that are relevant to UFBIs.

參考文獻


Ahire, S. L.,Golhar, D. Y.,Waller, M. A.(1996).Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs.Decision Sciences.27(1),23-56.
Aldemir, C.,Gulcan, Y.(2004).Student satisfaction in higher education: a turkish case.Higher Education Management and Policy.16(2),109-122.
Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin.103(3),411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P.(1992).The self regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior.Social Psychology Quarterly.55(2),178-204.
Benjamin, M.,Hollings, A.(1995).Towards a theory of student satisfaction: an explanatory study of the 'quality of student life'.Journal of College Student Development.36(6),574-586.

延伸閱讀