透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.179.186
  • 期刊

自美國法的啟示論我國連續交易炒作罪之適用

A Study on Issues of the Price Manipulation Clause under Taiwan Securities and Exchange Act: A Comparative Study with the U.S. Law

摘要


操縱市場行為泛指所有人為地影響證券市場活動並藉此誤導其他投資人之手段,該等行為除扭曲證券市場因自然供需形成之定價機制外,亦會破壞市場之公正性,美國1934年證券交易法第9條a項、第10條b項以及第15條c項皆明文禁止之。我國證券交易法第155條1項4款亦禁止意圖抬高或壓低某種有價證券價格而為連續交易行為,但該款在實務上產生不少的認定與適用爭議,致使個案上縱使合法的交易亦可能事後被指摘為不法操縱行為。如此不確定性對證券交易市場發展實有不利影響。查該款一般認為係師法美國證券交易法而來,因而本文即擬從介紹美國法操縱市場規範出發,再以比較法的觀點就我國法連續交易炒作罪之要件與適用爭議提出本文意見。本文研究成果將有助提升證券交易法制之安定性與可預測性,促進我國證券交易市場之發展。

並列摘要


Market Manipulation refers generally to practices intended to mislead investors by artificially affecting market activity, which distorts the pricing mechanism and deteriorates the integrity of the market for securities. Manipulation is prohibited under Section 9(a), 10(b) and 15(c) of U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Like the U.S., Taiwan also strikes behaviors involving price manipulation pursuant to the Subparagraph 4, Paragraph 1, Article 155 of Securities and Exchange Act (the Clause). However, the elements of the Clause seem vaguer and broader than the like provisions under the U.S. law, which makes applications of the Clause unpredictable and not in a consistent manner. Beginning with an introduction to regulations of market manipulation in the U.S., this Article is to study the existing body of cases and literatures, by a comparative approach, about how to apply the Clause, in hopes of clarifying some important issues in practice.

參考文獻


王志誠(2010),「證券市場操縱行為之規範構造及犯罪所得」,《台灣法學雜誌》,第 165 期,73-80。
王志誠(2018),「有價證券連續買賣之實務發展趨勢及評釋」,《萬國法律》,第 219 期,54-68。
李開遠(2008),「我國證券市場「不法炒作」操縱股價犯罪行為主觀構成要件意圖認定之探討」,《銘傳大學法學論叢》,第 10 期,131-174。
洪秀芬(2017),操縱股價的犯罪行為類型,謝哲勝編,《內線交易與操縱股價法律與政策》,55-80。
吳盈德(2018),「連續買賣操縱市場之構成要件/最高院 106 台上 2184 判決」,《台灣法學雜誌》,第 337 期,201-210。

延伸閱讀