透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.74.54
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

地主國產業群聚、進入地主國動機對進入模式選擇及經營績效影響之研究:以我國赴歐投資廠商爲對象之實證研究

The Impact of Host-Country Industry Cluster and Entry Motivation on the Entry Mode Selection and Overseas Performance: An Empirical Study Toward Taiwan-owned European MNCs

摘要


文獻對於企業國際化進入模式選擇之探討已多,但普遍有下列三項缺漏:一,研究多以美國企業為對象,但對歐亞之情況相對探究較少。二,許多研究所謂之「進入模式」,其實僅探討其中部分,其完整性有待加強。三,許多文獻在探討進入模式決定因素時,僅偏重局部因素,完整性不足。據此 ,本研究在回顧文獻之後,發現Porter(1990)鑽石模式之產業群聚觀念可用以解釋進入模式之選擇。本研究主要探討:(1)企業進入外國市場之動機,(2)地主國之產業群聚,(3)在地主國之經營歷史,及(4)產業別等因素對進入模式與其海外經營績效之影響。九十三個臺灣赴歐投資廠商樣本之實證結果指出,前述四項構念與進入模式確實具有顯著相關性。另外也發現地主國產業競爭條件越差,反而對其海外經營越有利;而進入模式及其產業群聚之交互作用則未能顯著解釋經營績效。

並列摘要


Foreign entry mode selection has been studied from divergent perspectives, some shortcomings, however, are still needed to improve. First, most related literature over-focused on the studies in US or those of American-owned MNCs, while they neglected the cases of European and Asian firms. Second, studies that explore entry mode determinants tended to focus on few particular topics. Third, the so-called ”entry mode” factually solely consider part of entry mode. After literature review, this study follows Porter's (1990) Diamond to explain how firms select their entry mode. Thus, this study attempts to clarify the impact of (1) motivation of entering the foreign country, (2) the industry cluster in domestic country, (3) the year length that the firms have operated in domestic nation, and (4) industrial classification, on entry mode selection and its performance. The empirical evidence, which samples 93 Taiwan-owned European firms as respondents, indicates that the previous four constructs are able to explain entry mode selection. In addition, the results also point out the worse the industry cluster is, the better the performance could get. While entry mode and its interaction with industry cluster fail to explain performance. Moreover, the authors also represent some practical suggestions and research directions for the future works.

參考文獻


李文瑞(2002)。國際導入策略:全資經營與合資經營之比較。產業金融。80,121-136。
林彩梅。美日多國籍企業經營策略。五南出版社
梁景星(1998)。我國企業多國籍化之研究-對外投資之探討(碩士論文)。文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳正男、譚大純(1997)。麥可波特『鑽石模式』量表化之初探:量表建構與實證研究。管理評論。
陳寶瑞()。

被引用紀錄


蔣佩玹(2017)。台商進入俄羅斯市場模式-以鴻海與宏碁為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00829
盧盈蓉(2014)。拉丁美洲市場進入模式之探討〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400334
林芷婷(2011)。多國籍企業跨文化訓練、國際化動機與組織績效的關聯性之研究〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0015-1006201115054400
林佑宗(2012)。前往越南投資成功關鍵因素研究-以自行車產業為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613520577

延伸閱讀